It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"The things that really got my attention were the amount of descent rate that you had to have at the end of the flight, of Flight 77, that would have made it practically impossible to hit the light poles. Essentially it would have been too high at that point to the point of impact where the main body of the airplane was hitting between the first and second floor of the Pentagon. ...
You know, I'd ride my bike to the Pentagon. So, you know I'm a little bit familiar with that area. But, you know, that kind of descent rate it would have been impossible essentially for the results that we see physically from what the flight data recorder was recording. Like I say, that's an area that I think deserves explanation.
After 4+ years of research since retirement in 2002, I am 100% convinced that the attacks of September 11, 2001 were planned, organized, and committed by treasonous perpetrators that have infiltrated the highest levels of our government. It is now time to take our country back.
"The truth is always the truth no matter how many people believe it.
A lie is always a lie no matter how many people believe it.
The official 9/11 story is a lie."
1.) Improbability of ALL 8 Airline Pilots voluntarily giving up control of their aircraft to individuals stating they have box cutters and have or will kill passengers; this is not the established protocol to give up control of aircraft and responsibility of safety for your passengers and crew.
2.) Improbability of ALL 8 Airline Pilots being killed without a deliberate violent flight control reaction that would upend any cockpit invasion.
3.) Improbability of ALL 8 Airline Pilots not entering the Hijack or Emergency Code into the transponder, alerting ATC of a serious problem.
4.) Improbability IF the above occurred that the marginally-trained hijackers would be able to operate the navigational systems and fly to specific points in airspace using Instrument Flight Rules
5.) Improbability of maneuvering the airliners above 400 kts airspeed (considered high speed) and precisely striking the comparatively small WTC 1 & 2 (Professional pilots in simulators have about a one in three chance of accomplishing this maneuver.)
6.) Improbability of maneuvering AA Flight 77 from 35,000 feet descending to hit the Pentagon, as stated by USG in an analysis of the Flight Data Recorder (FDR); specifically a 330 degree turn from 7000’, descending at a controlled airspeed of 290-300 kts, to precisely strike the Pentagon at ground level by a minimally-trained, unqualified hijacker.
There is significant evidence that the aircraft impacts did not cause the collapse [of the Twin Towers] ...
The issues of the penetration hole [at the Pentagon] and the lack of large pieces of debris simply do not jive with the official story, but they are explainable if you include the parking lot video evidence that shows a huge white explosion at impact. This cannot happen with an aircraft laden only with fuel. It can only happen in the presence of high explosives."
Joel M. Skousen
originally posted by: samkent
I see no qualifications for air crash investigation.
I see no qualifications for building collapse investigation.
I see no structural engineering qualifications.
.
Totally dismissing the fact that Lieutenant Colonel David Gapp is & Experienced Aircraft Accident Investigator & Former President of Aircraft Accident Board.
Heck you didn't even bother replying about captain Captain Russ Wittenberg. Who has flown a Boeing 707, 720, 727, 737, 747, 757, 767, and 777. And the two United Airlines aircraft that were ‘hijacked’ on 9/11. Flight 175, th......
originally posted by: samkent
a reply to: Debunkology
Totally dismissing the fact that Lieutenant Colonel David Gapp is & Experienced Aircraft Accident Investigator & Former President of Aircraft Accident Board.
The reasons for the crash are not in question.
Unless you believe the planes were holograms.
I've already shown you do not have to be an expert pilot to crash a jet into a building.
I've already shown you that these guys were commercial pilots and more than qualified.
If these pilots are right, why do 99% of the worlds pilots disagree with them?
Nothing ever comes from this truth movement.
All claims and promises. No substance.
Is to be dismissive and no doubt you will continue to do so.
There was a dearth of visible debris on the relatively unmarked [Pentagon] lawn, where I stood only minutes after the impact. Beyond this strange absence of airliner debris, there was no sign of the kind of damage to the Pentagon structure one would expect from the impact of a large airliner. This visible evidence or lack thereof may also have been apparent to the secretary of defense [Donald Rumsfeld], who in an unfortunate slip of the tongue referred to the aircraft that slammed into the Pentagon as a "missile". ...