It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by logicalthinking
We believe the official account of 9/11 as defined in the 9/11 Commission Report is grossly inaccurate and fatally flawed.
Originally posted by boondock-saint
so my question is this:
if the military officers know this was
an inside job, then why hasn't there been
a coup to fix the damn thing ???
edit on 14-9-2010 by boondock-saint because: spelling
Originally posted by Flatfish
It's a little late for a coup, don't you think? I believe the proper course of action at this point in time would be prosecution and sentencing.
Col. George Nelson, MBA, U.S. Air Force (ret) statement
"In my first position paper, titled The Precautionary Principle, [www.mo911truth.org...] written shortly after the attacks on NYC and the Pentagon, I cautioned readers against a rush to judgment, although the immediate evidence suggested the crime had been an inside job. As the years went by, a virtual mountain of physical evidence was collected by hundreds of highly qualified investigators -- evidence sufficient to convince any dedicated Grand Jury that the horrendous events of 9/11 were clearly an inside job. The Precautionary Principle no longer applies. It is time to positively conclude that a well-orchestrated and obviously pre-planned cover-up of the worst mass murder in our country's history began immediately following the deaths of 3,000 innocent people on September 11, 2001. Nearly nine years later the criminal cover-up continues. Fortunately for our country, our judicial system provides no statute of limitations for treason, first degree murder, and terrorism."
I am Major General Albert Stubblebine. I am retired Army Major-General. In my last assignment -- my last command -- I was responsible for all of the Army's strategic intelligence forces around the world. I had responsibility for the Signals Intelligence, Photo Intelligence, Counter Intelligence, Human Intelligence. They all belonged to me, in my last assignment. …
I was supposed to find out what the enemy was doing, before the enemy did it so that we could take action against the enemy. That's Intelligence, OK, before the fact. So, we always -- always -- rely not on a single piece of data, before we make a statement, but on multiple and the more pieces of data that you have that correlate, the better you know exactly what is going on. …
So I have had a lot of experience looking at photographs. I have looked at many, many different kinds of photographs, from many, many different platforms on many, many different countries, around the world.
Well, for one thing, if you look at the hole that was made in the Pentagon, the nose penetrated far enough so that there should have been wing marks on the walls of the Pentagon. I have been unable to find those wing marks. So where were they? Did this vessel -- vehicle, or whatever it was -- have wings? Apparently not, because if it had had wings, they would have made marks on the side of the Pentagon.
One of my experiences in the Army was being in charge of the Army’s Imagery Interpretation for Scientific and Technical Intelligence during the Cold War. I measured pieces of Soviet equipment from photographs. It was my job. I look at the hole in the Pentagon and I look at the size of an airplane that was supposed to have hit the Pentagon. And I said, ‘The plane does not fit in that hole’. So what did hit the Pentagon? What hit it? Where is it? What's going on?"
I would like a thread dedicate to these guys. So I think it's a good idea to bump this thread.
originally posted by: samkent
Out of 236,826 ACTIVE officers (Not counting Coast Guard) they have 320 (active and retired) who question 911.
That is .135 % of the US officers.
Why bother ? That percentage is meaningless.
So when A major General questions 9/11 you got to get your head out of the sand and take notice.
originally posted by: samkent
So when A major General questions 9/11 you got to get your head out of the sand and take notice.
Was that the general who attempted to walk through walls?
The general who supported 'men who star at goats' ?
Just because they have rank doesn't mean they know squat.
My daughter was an officer in the Air Force. She doesn't know squat.
These officers did not examine the evidence first hand that day.
These officers are not qualified crash investigators.
So instead of making weak attempts to character assassinate long standing high ranking military officers that have decades of service to the US military.
originally posted by: samkent
You brought up these guys.