It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Racists Are From Another Dimension!

page: 1
3
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 11 2010 @ 03:35 PM
link   
Racist people are from another dimension, they are not from the same dimension we non-racists live in.
in fact not only are they from another dimension but they are kind of intersecting in our dimension.

What hapens when two dimensions collide? Well string theory says that the big bang occured
That's why there is an upcoming race war and why people's beliefs are easy manipulated by bigotry.

Extreme racists like the KKK for example want a world where only white people live, where people like only them exist. This is similar to the violin vs. the tuning fork.
A violin is an instrument that can create beautiful harmonic fluctuating sounds while a tuning fork emits only one straight non-fluxating sound which makes your ears cringe.

So imagine a dimension where only a straight raw flatline sound is capable of being emited.
Racists want that dimension, where rather than acoustics it's physical features.

Actually I am just talking of a metaphor that I just thought of out loud

Can make for an interesting discussion though, however i'd understand if I got no replies



posted on Sep, 11 2010 @ 03:38 PM
link   
Ahh...

But if racists are the tuning fork and everyone else is the violin... Then the operative question has to be who is tuning and playing the instrument?.



posted on Sep, 11 2010 @ 03:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by ModernAcademia

Extreme racists like the KKK for example want a world where only white people live, where people like only them exist.


But who would they then bully and intimidate?

Not a bad metaphor though. The rasism is so deeply rooted that we cannot even say a 'n-word' as a 'n-word' when there's a black person nearby (haha! I know) without being a racists. I mean, if we think what we talk about foreigners when there are foreign people about, by being careful not to distinct them, we are infact making the distinction already in our minds. Which makes us racists!

Now how's that with the strings?

PS. And I just learned that ATS is a racist board, because it auto edited my n-words


-v


edit on 11-9-2010 by v01i0 because: for lollerb0n3r5



posted on Sep, 11 2010 @ 03:53 PM
link   
reply to post by Hefficide
 


i like to think of all the religious deities as being in some kind of heavenly rock band. mohammed on the drums, buddha on the bass, krishna on the guitar and of course jesus doing vocals.



posted on Sep, 11 2010 @ 03:58 PM
link   
One guy's racism, is another's pride. For instance, a Mexican or black can be proud of their heritage and race without being labled a racist, though a Caucasian would be labled a racist for that same pride. Also, it seems that it is not racist to bash white people or condemn Caucasians for the actions of a few (who shared the same skin tone), though it is racist to do the same for any other race. Blame the entire white race for the actions of a tiny fraction of .0001 percent and a racist you are not (apparently and according to society), though suggest that crime is rampant among blacks (not even condemning the race as a whole) and your condemnation as a racist will be cemented. Hire someone due simply to their skin color and you are aracist so long as the person is white but if that person isn't white, then it is apparently justified. Before we can even theorize about racism, we have to not only define it, but also standardize it because if we don't, well then we are being racist.




--airspoon




edit on 11-9-2010 by airspoon because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 11 2010 @ 04:09 PM
link   
reply to post by airspoon
 


Being proud of one's general heritage is not racism,this is normal situation. Better of course (and healthier to society)to be proud , but acknowledge skeletons in the closet, sadly few are capable of this.
Thinking that one's heritage is so much better then that of others is bordering racism. Grey area. Lots of people there.
Discriminating (blindly) people with different heritage is racism.
This is my ladder.



posted on Sep, 11 2010 @ 04:13 PM
link   
reply to post by 2weird2live2rare2die
 


The holy Rollers


I can dig it



posted on Sep, 11 2010 @ 05:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by airspoon
One guy's racism, is another's pride. For instance, a Mexican or black can be proud of their heritage and race without being labled a racist, though a Caucasian would be labled a racist for that same pride. Also, it seems that it is not racist to bash white people or condemn Caucasians for the actions of a few (who shared the same skin tone), though it is racist to do the same for any other race. Blame the entire white race for the actions of a tiny fraction of .0001 percent and a racist you are not


But you are equating the perception of racism with racism
two different things as i'm sure you will agree with



posted on Sep, 12 2010 @ 04:02 PM
link   
Speaking of racial wars you might find this interesting.I live in South Africa and we've had our own nostradamus.This guy,Siener van Rensburg,predicts a racial war might be coming.Not only for us in South Africa but around the world.

en.wikipedia.org...
heavenawaits.wordpress.com...



posted on Sep, 12 2010 @ 04:13 PM
link   
reply to post by ModernAcademia
 


many people seem to be addicted to the symptoms and side effects of fear and to fear itself.

sometimes i entertain the idea that racism is an aspect of specism. speciesism



Definition of SPECIESISM
1: prejudice or discrimination based on species; especially : discrimination against animals
2: the assumption of human superiority on which speciesism is based
merriam-webster





edit on 12-9-2010 by Esoteric Teacher because: fear is a drug. reference: cells



posted on Sep, 21 2010 @ 02:37 AM
link   
reply to post by ModernAcademia
 




imagine a dimension where only a straight raw flatline
sound is capable of being emited. Racists want that dimension,
where rather than acoustics it's physical features.

Imagine a racist chocolate cake in which the only ingredients are chocolate and cake. Now imagine a non-racist chocolate cake that has chocolate, cake, maple syrup, pork rinds, doritos, ground beef and coleslaw in it.

Which would you rather have?



posted on Sep, 21 2010 @ 03:00 AM
link   
reply to post by LordBucket
 




Imagine a racist chocolate cake in which the only ingredients are chocolate and cake. Now imagine a non-racist chocolate cake that has chocolate, cake, maple syrup, pork rinds, doritos, ground beef and coleslaw in it. Which would you rather have?


Ah, that metaphor already combines different ingredients in a homogeneous harmony. Try just having the flour if you live in a racist dimension.
No eggs, no sugar or salt. No baking powder. No butter. No chocolate. Just the base ingredient of flour. And at all times keep the ingredients separate and do not mix them at all.


Great thread OP, like it a lot.

Cheers
Shane


edit on 21/9/10 by shamus78 because: My spelling is really bad somtimes...



posted on Sep, 21 2010 @ 03:20 AM
link   
reply to post by shamus78
 



that metaphor already combines different
ingredients in a homogeneous harmony.

Harmony is not a result of accepting anything and everything. One does not produce harmonic chords by playing any and all notes together. One produces harmony by selectively bringing together components that complement one another, and excluding the ones that don't.



posted on Sep, 21 2010 @ 03:30 AM
link   
reply to post by LordBucket
 


Okay, maybe the eggs can stick around to help the flour


On a serious note: I don't really think any 'racists' out there know what makes a 'harmonious' society. It certainly isn't segregating and undermining another based upon race or appearance. Perhaps they should look at themselves and try to learn to accept others rather then oppose them. Race is silly. We all bleed the same colour.

Cheers
Shane



posted on Sep, 21 2010 @ 03:58 AM
link   


Racism is the belief that the genetic factors which constitute race are a primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race.[1] Racisms effects are called "racial discrimination." In the case of institutional racism, certain racial groups may be denied rights or benefits, or receive preferential treatment.


Personally I believe there is only one kind of racism *institutional racism*. It is the government/elites who turn the "dominant" race against the "persecuted" race through propaganda and false flag events (I say events because a false flag doesn't have to be an attack).

What do they have to gain from racism? CONTROL, as long as we are fighting eachover we won't fight them!

Peace.
ALS



posted on Sep, 21 2010 @ 03:59 AM
link   
reply to post by shamus78
 




I don't really think any 'racists' out there know
what makes a 'harmonious' society.

Presumably they know what they like. I know someone who enjoys bannana on pizza. Personally I think it's awful. I accept that she likes it, but I don't eat it myself just becaues she does. It would be silly for her to insist that I eat bananna on pizza just because she likes it.

Similarly, it's silly to insist that racists should accept people they don't like, just because somebody else likes them.



Perhaps they should look at themselves and try to
learn to accept others rather then oppose them.

And perhaps you should look at racists and learn to accept that their likes and dislikes may be different from yours.



posted on Sep, 21 2010 @ 04:11 AM
link   
reply to post by LordBucket
 




And perhaps you should look at racists and learn to accept that their likes and dislikes may be different from yours.


ARGGH! Does that make me racist against racists? Someone make up a name for me please! (And no profanity please)


Look, all the white power, black power and all those in between I have met have been fixated on race. To me it isn't an issue. To me, personally, its a silly and childish way of defining people.

I'm not going to de-rail this thread. Lets get back to the OP please. Lets get back to talking about inter-dimensional racists. (I love ATS)

Alright?

Cheers
Shane


edit on 21/9/10 by shamus78 because: made a mistake



posted on Sep, 21 2010 @ 04:16 AM
link   
reply to post by LordBucket
 




And perhaps you should look at racists and learn to accept that their likes and dislikes may be different from yours.


I think what your trying to say is; To be truly tolerant, you have to be tolerant of thee intolerant!

Damn that's a lot of tolerance
.

Peace.
ALS



posted on Sep, 21 2010 @ 04:24 AM
link   
reply to post by shamus78
 




I'm not going to de-rail this thread.
Lets get back to the OP please.


We're completely on topic. The OP proposed the idea that racists want a world where they only have the elements they like. I think that's an excellent way of describing it.

Who are you to tell them what's ok and what's not ok for them to like?



To me it isn't an issue. To me, personally


And that's fine. To you, personally. And for them, personally...it is an issue. How can you justify the idea that it's not ok for somebody else to have a preference that you don't personally relate to?

Let's say I don't like fish, so I don't have a pet fish. Is that ok?

Let's say I don't like asparagus, so I don't eat asparagus. Is that ok?

Let's say I don't like black people, so I don't talk to them. Is that ok?

If your answer is no, how do you justify it?



posted on Sep, 21 2010 @ 04:30 AM
link   
reply to post by LordBucket
 





Racist people are from another dimension, they are not from the same dimension we non-racists live in.


Actually that's not what the OP stipulated.

Anyway - my answer is no.


You should be nice to people. Maybe not asparagus (although you should always eat your veges), but people definitely. Fish don't really care. Simple really


Shane




edit on 21/9/10 by shamus78 because: added a witty comment



new topics

top topics



 
3
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join