It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by witness63
Obama inherited a country that was already in terminal decline, like the old British Empire, and that's not a lot that can be done about it.
God, this whole "blame Obama" angle never ceases.
The origins of Barack Obama's petulance
Obama has experienced a radical drop in approval ratings. His preconceived notions about the world abroad have proven shockingly therapeutic. He must be disappointed that an Ahmadinejad or Putin is not swayed by his charisma and does what he pleases ... . Messianic disappointment with an unappreciative lesser world can explain a lot.
Keynesian economics did not pan out. ... He must be confused why he is both being attacked by friends and yet unable to borrow his way to recovery.
Yet Obama’s petulance, I think, more likely derives from a certain surprise — leading to anger — that originates from novel and sudden demands for accountability. Quite simply, no one has dared question Obama before — much less press him for deeds to match his mellifluous words.
Did he really think he could talk his way through four years of the American presidency?
Apparently, he did, and apparently he was almost right — given that rhetoric and sophistry earned him the presidency in the first place.
pajamasmedia.com...
But enough speculation over motives for the origins of Obama’s strange and growing petulance. All that matters for the country is that the current president of the United States seems surprised that as our chief executive he is earning scrutiny not previously accorded him — and that he finds that demand for accountability both exasperating and abjectly unfair. Thus this week’s latest “like a dog” whine.
For some reason, Obama believed that those who expected after his campaign promises a real upturn in the economy, or fiscal responsibility, or inspired foreign policy would be satisfied, as they had in the past, merely with soaring rhetoric and superficial reassurance. When they were not, and voiced such displeasure, as ingrates they had supposedly reduced Obama to canine-like status.
There is no need to add that abroad an Ahmadinejad, Assad, or Putin does not care a bit for the supposed personal chemistry or ethnic profile of Obama. Whether he was “clean” or not would be an absurdity to them. We sense only that those authoritarian sorts seem so far to like the idea that Obama speaks ambiguously about his country’s past and future, and appears more comfortable in pondering alternatives than making decisions.
Given all that, it is understandable both why America is very worried about what it has wrought — and why Barack Obama is miffed and lashes out.
You would too if both accountability and criticism were novel experiences at 49.
Now people are getting a taste of what Obama thinks is right for America. He's simply following through on a campaign promise, whether or not people actually like it.
Obama inherited a country that was already in terminal decline, like the old British Empire, and th[ere]'s not a lot that can be done about it.
I can't tell if it is on purpose or they actually believe he caused this mess.
Originally posted by jdub297
reply to post by lee anoma
I can't tell if it is on purpose or they actually believe he caused this mess.
Face it; "this mess" is largely Obama's creation.
Everything people criticize the Bush administration for -- 2 wars, bank bailouts, government expansion and intrusion upon people's lives -- Obama has magnified in spades.
Even Bush's scheduled Iraq withdrawal has been botched; we still have troops dying in combat while Obama claims credit for "ending the war."
He can't even do THAT right, because it's not part of his greater agenda.
So many of Obama's supporters are quick to rally to his side, but have no more clue what it is he is going to do to "fix this mess" than HE does. The truth is, he doesn't want to fix the mess - it fits in his plans!
The senior Obama proposed that the state confiscate private land and raise taxes with no upper limit. In fact, he insisted that "theoretically there is nothing that can stop the government from taxing 100% of income so long as the people get benefits from the government commensurate with their income which is taxed."
Remarkably, President Obama, who knows his father's history very well, has never mentioned his father's article. Even more remarkably, there has been virtually no reporting on a document that seems directly relevant to what the junior Obama is doing in the White House.
Originally posted by babybunnies
When Obama was running for President, if anyone actually listened to a campaign speech instead of just blindly voting him in, they would have actually heard him say, many times, that "I'm going to do what I think is right for America, not what is necessarily popular". He wasn't shy about saying this several times a day in campaign speeches.
Now people are getting a taste of what Obama thinks is right for America. He's simply following through on a campaign promise, whether or not people actually like it.
Originally posted by jaynkeel
reply to post by mythatsabigprobe
I am not sure where your idea of decrease in unemployment is?
And I am far from rich and I have not seen any decrease in my taxes taken out of my wages? Not sure what tax decreases your referring to?
I know as usual my property taxes and school taxes keep going up so it must not be that that decreased, unless the decreases only effect the wealthier of our society?