The word "PROOF" will no longer be tolerated.

I have been to a lot of places around the world, I have been blessed to see many cultures. I have met some very interesting people. Some from right here on these boards. And I am usually a very tolerant person. Meaning I am not prone to "go postal" over small things. I am afraid I can no longer just sit back and watch it all happen. If I see the word "PROOF" used in the title of a thread, there had better be some real, bonified, backed up by reputable sources, with pictures, and a chain of custody of said photos, or I will assemble the Insane Cloud Posse, arm them and we will systematically destroy every town where one of these "PROOFERS" live. I can't take the chance of them getting away, or blending in to the landscape, so I am afraid nothing less than a full out 7 kiloton nuclear warhead will be deployed. I may feel a bit of remorse for the innocents that had to pay for your sins, but in the end, I think all will agree that the use of deadly force was indeed needed.


Remember, don't be a "PROOFER".

I need to find my prescription. I think I am low on my meds.

Hey everyone come check out my newest thread: Absolute solid PROOF that Network Dude has gone off the deep end!!!


Don't forget to S&F while your there. People who don't S&F are rude.




Edit to add:
Also, if you want some REAL proof, check out the thread in my sig.

Originally posted by FortAnthem
Hey everyone come check out my newest thread: Absolute solid PROOF that Network Dude has gone off the deep end!!!

Don't forget to S&F while your there. People who don't S&F are rude.

edit on 9/10/10 by FortAnthem because:

GUILTY!! Evidence is information that helps form a conclusion; proof is factual information that verifies a conclusion. So... you are incorrect in your assertion and are demonstrating exactly what OP is ranting about ... There is an inordinate amount of evidence that network dude has gone off the deep end, however, we won't have PROOF until he actually nukes someone.

reply to post by network dude


Errr, umm... You wouldn't happen to have 'proof' of these here nukes.... would you? Pictures or it didn't happen?

reply to post by network dude


I promise, I will not use the word "proof" unless there actually is some validity to that which I'm attributing it to. Clowns are scary...

I agree with you but... What is a reputable source? Is there such a thing? One man's reputable source is another man's propaganda mill. Hardly anything in life is proven and that even goes for what we tell oursleves.

--airspoon

Originally posted by airspoon
I agree with you but... What is a reputable source? Is there such a thing? One man's reputable source is another man's propaganda mill. Hardly anything in life is proven and that even goes for what we tell oursleves.

--airspoon

very nicely said spoon

the main idea here is what sources are considered "proof"
and you have a just statement. I don't know if there are
ANY reputable sources as multiple MSM news outlets
can promulgate the same retarded story known as
syndication. So the only way to prove sources
credible are to put them under scrutiny in a court of law
which we do not have on ATS. So a consistent reputation
for truth is all we have in the internet realm.

And a S&F to the OP for a rant well deserved

Originally posted by network dude
I have been to a lot of places around the world, I have been blessed to see many cultures. I have met some very interesting people. Some from right here on these boards. And I am usually a very tolerant person. Meaning I am not prone to "go postal" over small things. I am afraid I can no longer just sit back and watch it all happen. If I see the word "PROOF" used in the title of a thread, there had better be some real, bonified, backed up by reputable sources, with pictures, and a chain of custody of said photos, or I will assemble the Insane Cloud Posse, arm them and we will systematically destroy every town where one of these "PROOFERS" live. I can't take the chance of them getting away, or blending in to the landscape, so I am afraid nothing less than a full out 7 kiloton nuclear warhead will be deployed. I may feel a bit of remorse for the innocents that had to pay for your sins, but in the end, I think all will agree that the use of deadly force was indeed needed.


Remember, don't be a "PROOFER".

I need to find my prescription. I think I am low on my meds.

edit on 10-9-2010 by network dude because: cus I am a bad speler

LOL

"Proof" seems to be in the eye of the beer holder er..........I mean, beholder these days.

What's proof to you, is rubbish to others.
Even when people ADMIT to a crime (i.e., 'I set a house on fire") still leaves wiggle room and argument for being coerced.

I think what the new millenium is all about is: Seek your own truth. Strength by numbers no longer apply.

We need to be free-thinking individuals in order to come together as One. As profound as that is, I think that's the evolution until we've mastered telepathy (where no one gets away with anything to the point where....no one will even try)

I would be content if every thread with "PROOF" in the title also automatically got a [HOAX] tag added to it, until determined otherwise by a Mod.

I agree with you.

When I see the title of a post with the word PROOF in it, I have my doubts.

Thanks for the humor.

edit

I have a timetravel machine i have proof

reply to post by network dude


When the Dept of Homeland Security gets there make sure to hold your prescription
up in front of you and nothing that looks like a firearm.

Oh, and good luck with that !

LOL

reply to post by network dude


Just do me a favor, and start with D.C

reply to post by JoshNorton


Hey now, I have used the word "proof" in a thread title before and it wasn't a hoax. To me, the information and video presented in the thread is proof. The thread is titled, 'Proof that "Al Qaeda in Iraq" were armed by the US? (VIDEO)'.

--airspoon

Thanks for the replys. Yes, it was an attempt at humor, yet spotlighting a very serious problem that plagues us all.

I would like to be noted as the one who coined the phrase "Proofer".

And I have nukes, oh yea, I got em. But I seem to be a bit short on proo......... never mind.

I have used the term proof as well...I considered the use of the term and felt comfortable...that said, I do agree that many use the term a bit haphazardly...good discussion...

Originally posted by network dude
I would like to be noted as the one who coined the phrase "Proofer".

Ah but you would have to have proof that you are the one who coined the word "Proofer"...

I have PROOF that GeechQuestInfo claimed the rights to the coinage a year and a half ago!

www.abovetopsecret.com...

But hey, I guess "watching" a radio interview now is ABSOLUTE PROOF of something. Sweet! I would like to hereby coin the term PROOFER:

One who with no solid evidence claims PROOF

ABOLUTE 100% PROOF...... The vodka OP must be drinking !
Nice rant !

reply to post by Iamonlyhuman

I have PROOF that GeechQuestInfo claimed the rights to the coinage a year and a half ago!

That's no proof, it's evidence.

Until you can PROOVE that nobody on this God's green Earth used that phrase before GeechQuestInfo it hasn't been proven that he coined the phrase first.


Turnabout is fair play.