It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by hmmmbeer
Because we know the truth. And once you know the truth, you can never un-know. We are not swinging voters.
We will be vigilant to the end. The real 9/11 plotters will be brought to justice, one day.
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
In every major event on our history, there have been a type of mentality who instantly screams CONSPIRACY in knee jerk reflex
So the truth movements response to the fed's lying is to lie about them back (i.e. Controlled Demolition, No planes, Thermite, etc.)? Seems kind of childish if you ask me.
Originally posted by VirginiaRisesYetAgain
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
In every major event on our history, there have been a type of mentality who instantly screams CONSPIRACY in knee jerk reflex
And maybe the reason there are so many alleged conspiracies is because THE FEDS ARE CORRUPT AND --YES-- THEY LIE TO YOU, ALL THE TIME!!!
Originally posted by bekod
9/11 will be just like who killed JFK, there will be questions and new theory's. Will we ever get the real story or the truth? One must keep asking and digging to find it, and when they do will they be silenced?
[edit on 7-9-2010 by bekod]
Originally posted by VirginiaRisesYetAgain
Knee-jerking is what you do every time we ask you to actually prove something about 9/11 and you go off into epic rants instead, that have all of us thinking, "Aw, Jeez, not this crap again!!"
-- Gulf of Tonkin that got us into Vietnam:
PROVEN TO HAVE NEVER HAPPENED, by the NSA's own declassified documents.
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
Originally posted by VirginiaRisesYetAgain
Knee-jerking is what you do every time we ask you to actually prove something about 9/11 and you go off into epic rants instead, that have all of us thinking, "Aw, Jeez, not this crap again!!"
Bovine scatology! I have the facts on my side and I have nothing to hide, so whenever someone asks a question I try to answer it, and I KNOW you've seen some of the photos I've posted of the steel recovered at ground zero. You people can't even explain why the steel shows NO signs of sabotage from explosives whatsoever, and yet you obviously don't want to give these "controlled demolitions" stories up so you'll grasp at any and every straw you can find to keep them alive, like arguments over what "pull it" means. Is your head so genuinely up in the clouds that you really think that the occupants in the buildings being rigged with controlled demolitions wouldn't notice what's going on?
Proof has nothing to do with this, it's out of the WANTING to believe these conspiracies are real, which is what I said in my response to the OP. If people want to believe the moon landing was a hoax, then that's what they're going to believe come hell or high water. If people want to believe there are UFOs at area 51, then that's what they're going to believe come hell or high water. Likewise, if people want to believe the 9/11 attack was staged, then that's likewise what they're going to believe come hell or high water. You only need to look at Dr. Judy Wood's lawsuit against NIST over her "laser from outer space" scenario to see that in spades.
-- Gulf of Tonkin that got us into Vietnam:
PROVEN TO HAVE NEVER HAPPENED, by the NSA's own declassified documents.
So flipping what? The footage of NVA tanks busting down the gates of the presidential palace in Saigon is all the proof anyone needs of North Vietnam's desire to subjugate the south. The expansionism of North Vietnam and cold war politics of containment is the WHY of our involvement in Vietnam. The gulf of Tonkin is the HOW.
I've said before and I'll say it again- I find the large majority of people who believe in these 9/11 conspiracies subscribe to one or more OTHER conspiracies, long before 9/11, so if they're wearing conspiracy colored glasses then of course they're going to see 9/11 as yet another conspiracy. How would they not see it as yet another conspiracy?
So what other conspiracies do YOU subscribe to? The JFK assasination? The Jewish world order? Chemtrails?
Originally posted by hmmmbeer
OK, one more post.
I would like any of the good folk who believe the OS to explain, in their own words, any of the following:
Why flight 77 chose to not hit the first face of the pentagon it came to up the river - the one that houses the big brass, but instead did an amazing manoever and hit an almost empty rewly reinforced side. And of the fact there is no video of that, and no wreckage - no engines - no bodies.
OR
How the pancake theory of the twin towers can explain a collapse at nearly freefall speed (without preplaned explosives).
OR
Why Tower 7 fell neatly into its own footprint at nearly freefall speed (without preplaned explosives).
No quoting or links - in your own words please. My preference would be the first. Photos exist of the pentagon prior to the roof collapse and there is just on little hole. Where the engines would have been on a boeing relative to the hole are still intact. Reinforced windows eh? 3 tonnes of metal travelling at great speed....
Why flight 77 chose to not hit the first face of the pentagon it came to up the river - the one that houses the big brass, but instead did an amazing manoever and hit an almost empty rewly reinforced side. And of the fact there is no video of that, and no wreckage - no engines - no bodies.
Originally posted by vipertech0596
reply to post by hmmmbeer
>>>>Its ignorant statements like this that just irritate the crap out of some people.
Please do not bother replying then. I have a point of view I am trying to share. Ignore me please.