It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Death_Kron
reply to post by seagull
I didn't say I was ignoring anything, I just basically stated that an obvious comment about my appearance be that my skin colour, weight, height wouldn't affect me if it was true.
Weight is a tricky one though as height and skin colour can't be controlled, a persons weight can be controlled - although some people will always be larger than others regardless of what they do.
However, the same principle still applies, pointing out the obvious shouldn't be offensive.
Originally posted by pacific_waters
That's your racism showing. In Holland a black man can be called a black man without any problem. No one takes offense because no offense is intended. Your last sentence doesn't make any sense at all.
Originally posted by ANOK
I think you're missing that we are talking about using the term 'black man' or 'white man' as a negative. It can be used as a negative for both blacks, and whites, but 'white man' does not have the negativity attached to it as 'black man' does.
To be called a 'white man' has no negativity because the term has never been used that way. The term 'black man' has been used negatively, and used the wrong way can be insulting due to it's historical use.
That is my point, OK? Who am I supposed to be racist against here?
Originally posted by flycatch
They took on the name of African American and sought revenge on those they claimed oppressed them. Our government played a large extend in fostering this hatered and they are still doing it. Some not all black people in America behave in such a manner but those that do perpetuate racism. Look at our politics and the constant use of racism to end political debate.
The correct term is Black Americans. African American was a term invented so as not to "insult" the American race and to keep it pc. Brits living in the UK are called Black and not African English so why use African American
Originally posted by Death_Kron
So it's wrong for me to find it offensive if someone call's me a white boy but okay for a coloured person to find it offensive if I name their genuine colour of skin?
Originally posted by ANOK
Originally posted by Death_Kron
So it's wrong for me to find it offensive if someone call's me a white boy but okay for a coloured person to find it offensive if I name their genuine colour of skin?
What is offending you the term BOY, or the WHITE part? Boy has nothing to do with your race and being called white is not an insult.
Calling someone boy regardless of skin colour could be offensive.
I thought we were disusing 'white man' vs 'black man'?
Or are we now going to 'white boy' vs 'black boy'?
Originally posted by Death_Kron
Thus calling someone black isn't offensive????
Originally posted by Death_Kron
reply to post by ANOK
Really?
www.revisionisthistory.org...
Can't I not argue the same?
Originally posted by ANOK
Lets say you have suffered from racism for years. Are you telling me you wouldn't have a reason to not trust those that did that to you?
Originally posted by ANOK
but in the context of history they have more justification for hating whites than whites hating blacks.
Originally posted by ANOK
I'm just trying to dispel the myth that the racism from both sides is equal and comes from the same place, it doesn't.
Originally posted by ANOK
Who am I being racist against? I'm white so it's not white people.
Originally posted by Death_Kron
reply to post by ANOK
I'm not a racist mate.
But it still doesn't change my point that one argument can be used for one but not the other...