It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Esoteric Teacher
reply to post by Varemia
interesting videos. but honestly, were there those who had the intentions of proving this could be done after the fact (after 9-11)?
was this knowledge/technology known and implimented on 9-11?
i don't know the answers to those questions.
Originally posted by Varemia
but at least the main towers can have a completely non-explosive related destruction.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Just wanted to say thank you, Veremia. I just noticed you posted AlienEntity's videos. That tells me YOU are AlienEntity peddling your videos since you were banned from ATS before. I don't remember your old screen name at the moment, but rest assured I'll find out.
Those same videos were posted elsewhere on the internet, but you just had to post them from AlienEntity's account.
Busted, dude.
Originally posted by Varemia
As my post shows, you don't even need explosives to demolish a skyscraper
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Originally posted by Varemia
As my post shows, you don't even need explosives to demolish a skyscraper
You mean concrete skyscraper. Concrete crumbles like the buildings in your videos. Steel-structured buildings do not. Nobody bought this the last time these videos were posted here before, nobody is going to buy it now.
Those concrete buildings in your videos aren't even close to comparable to any steel-structured highrise. Keep trying, AlienEntity.
Originally posted by Varemia
The essence isn't in the material, but the forces involved.
Originally posted by Varemia
I'm not AlienEntity
Originally posted by Varemia
I would rather not have my post credibility reduced by baseless accusations.
Originally posted by Chadwickus
I'm curious, why would they need to blow out that part of the building? It was already on it's way down by that stage.
Originally posted by Chadwickus
It looks more like air finding the least resistance on it's way out through a window from a dramatic pressure change, IE dozens of floors collapsing above.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Originally posted by Chadwickus
I'm curious, why would they need to blow out that part of the building? It was already on it's way down by that stage.
It's called weakening the structure below the collapse wave to eliminate resistance.
Originally posted by Chadwickus
It looks more like air finding the least resistance on it's way out through a window from a dramatic pressure change, IE dozens of floors collapsing above.
That may be what it "looks like" to the unknowledgeable or lay person, but I also included an image of a know controlled demolition with the same "air". That "air" or puffs/ejections are the direct result of high-powered explosives being detonated in controlled demolitions.
You will never find those concentrated puffs in any other building collapse besides controlled demolitions. Only those in denial have made up the fairy tale of escaping air so that they don't have to believe in an alternate conspiracy.
To each their own, though. Whatever people have to tell themselves so that they can sleep at night.
Originally posted by Varemia
I found a video with a number of controlled demolitions and only perhaps 2 or 3 of the buildings demolished showed any kind of ejections. By your logic, I would imagine that all of them would be ejecting on the way down, no?