It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Ambulance charges have long been common and are usually paid by health insurance, but fees for other responders are relatively new. The charge is variously called a “crash tax” or “resource recovery,” depending on one’s point of view. In either case, motorists are billed for services they may have thought were covered by taxpayers.
Originally posted by Rockerchic4God
I'd be curious to know what they're doing with all the 9-1-1 medical calls they receive. There is a large population of elderly and disabled who call 911 whenever they have trouble breathing, have chest pains, etc. These people are on fixed incomes (those on SSI get $845 per mo.) How are they going to charge these people? You can't get water from a rock.
?
Originally posted by Quaght
reply to post by abecedarian
A cogent argument, to be sure. However, fire and police get paid when they are on the clock, not only when "something happens". Suppose it's a quiet day, or even a quiet week? Do they get shorted on their paycheck? No, they are still getting paid. Do the residents that didn't require their services get a refund for the FD sitting around all day waiting for an emergency that didn't come? Highly unlikely.
The services that local taxes pay for are there for everyone to use within that city, whether or not they are a resident, with some exceptions (like the local library). Our taxes pay for city water treatment. Does that mean that someone from another city must pay extra to drink from a fountain?
/Q
The services that local taxes pay for are there for everyone to use within that city, whether or not they are a resident, with some exceptions (like the local library).
Originally posted by crazydaisy
As far as I know the city I live in is not charging for this service and I hope they don't in the future. People on SS and disability could not afford to pay. Surely they would not refuse service if you can't pay. This has always been paid thru taxes and has worked well, why change it
Originally posted by abecedarian
But if you insist, I will quote you:
The services that local taxes pay for are there for everyone to use within that city, whether or not they are a resident, with some exceptions (like the local library).
local taxes, with some exceptions (like the local library).
What seperates the library from the fire department?
Thank you.
Originally posted by abecedarian
Federal law provides for treatment in emergency situations. I.e. a hospital must treat anyone that enters to the extent that the person is stabilized and can be transfered to another facility that can complete the treatment.
In otherwords, a hospital cannot turn you away if you're injured, feel sick or whatever. They do not "have" to fix you up 100%, but just enough so you can go to the next hospital, if necessary.
Originally posted by Quaght
Originally posted by abecedarian
But if you insist, I will quote you:
The services that local taxes pay for are there for everyone to use within that city, whether or not they are a resident, with some exceptions (like the local library).
local taxes, with some exceptions (like the local library).
What seperates the library from the fire department?
Thank you.
The library isn't a life or death service. While it's true that in my city you can check out books, music and video for a fee if you are not a resident (which I just found out with some research) it is a voluntary action to walk into the library and use their services. If an out-of-towner is in an accident that is not their fault, why should they have to pay the city for it?
/Q
Originally posted by Myendica
reply to post by abecedarian
No one should pay, someone will replace that book, its a book. My sister had a fine mailed to her out of no where for 500$ for a book, she had already returned, 1 week after due date. Please... its a book, and if they put an ad in the paper saying they lost such and such book, someone would donate it.
Originally posted by abecedarian
If anyone, local or not, lost a book taken from your public library, who should pay to replace the book?
[edit on 9/5/2010 by abecedarian]
Originally posted by Quaght
Originally posted by abecedarian
If anyone, local or not, lost a book taken from your public library, who should pay to replace the book?
[edit on 9/5/2010 by abecedarian]
Call me a knucklehead but...the person that lost it? In the absence of the personal responsibility that the person in question lacks, the library, and the city (the taxpayers) eat the cost of the lost book. However, if there is a month of no lost books, we still pay the same amount of taxes. So it appears that the amount paid to the library to keep up its facilities already covers that cost anyway.
/Q