Madeleine McCann found by 4chan?

On a lark I went to 4chan.org and immediately saw this picture on this thread which has been '404'd- boards.4chan.org...
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/09815753597e.jpg[/atsimg]

It was posted today, and the discovery was apparently made yesterday. Among the comments I saw one that said she was indeed rescued.

Can any confirm this?

Interesting timing since new info about Madeleine McCann came out only two days ago...

Has Madeleine indeed been found?

Well it doesn't really look like her. Is this screenshot of a thread the only proof?

Related Threads:

www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...

reply to post by star in a jar


if this is/was a hoax, it is/was a very sick one indeed.

if this is her, i wish her and her family well, and a quick reunion.

[edit on 3-9-2010 by Esoteric Teacher]

In 2nd look yeah it looks shockingly like her. Are you saying the man who she was kidnapped for has held her all this time and has pictures of her in his house on his computer and then uploads them the moment he sees a picture of her on /b/?

reply to post by Nventual
Unfortunately it's not a screenshot, it's an saved .jpg.

I think the thread was alive for only a few minutes. A lot of /b/ comments like 'wat' and 'wut' in rapid succession afterwards.

I've got a horrible feeling in the pit of my stomach that this is a load of BS, and I'm going to get very angry indeed.

I'm not having a go at the OP, just the sicko who made this up.

reply to post by star in a jar


All I get when I click the link is a 404 Is the problem me or is this a hoax picture? If so, I hope they arrest whoever posted those pics on /b/!

reply to post by Nventual
I wonder about that too, the story is that /b/ tracked her down from looking into the .exif data of the picture.

Originally posted by jennybee35
reply to post by star in a jar

 

All I get when I click the link is a 404

Is the problem me or is this a hoax picture? If so, I hope they arrest whoever posted those pics on /b/!

OP already said the thread had 404'd.

reply to post by jennybee35
It was '404' because it showed a little girl tied up I think, 'rule 34' or something...

Or something else happened.

I agree with Kiwifoot, if this is a hoax... I'm going to be upset too.

Hard to say but coming from /b/ it's more than likely a fake. The person probably just convinced their little sister to pose for the photo. It could be any little blond haired girl really.

Originally posted by star in a jar
reply to post by jennybee35
It was '404' because it showed a little girl tied up I think, 'rule 34' or something...

Or something else happened.

I agree with Kiwifoot, if this is a hoax... I'm going to be upset too.

Lol rule 34 is (usually drawn) porn of childhood cartoons, toys, etc. For example spongebob naked.

[edit on 3/9/10 by Nventual]

reply to post by Nventual
Yeah I don't know... It does seem odd, the time frame. It could have been in someone's 'collection' or something.

I believe the first photo of the girl in the whatever (warddrobe?) was posted on /b/ a couple of months ago. I searched on google for the filename of the photo and it came up in a thread on /b/ in July.

I don't want to post the number here because otherwise people will be coming here and seeing my post when they're searching for the photo.

reply to post by star in a jar


Thats not rule 34..

Rule 34 is "If it exists, there is porn of it. No exceptions."

So maybe R34 did get it closed.

Originally posted by Nventual

Originally posted by star in a jar
reply to post by jennybee35
It was '404' because it showed a little girl tied up I think, 'rule 34' or something...

Or something else happened.

I agree with Kiwifoot, if this is a hoax... I'm going to be upset too.

Lol rule 34 is porn of childhood animations, toys, etc, pretty much porn of anything that shouldn't be porn.

No, rule 34 is the rule that if it exists, there is porn of it.

And it's true. Do not test this, of fear of ruining your child hood.

I've even seen a mountain dew and a sandwich doing it.

reply to post by Nventual
I'm a newb, I don't know much about the culture there, so I hope it's ok for me to post the image on ATS

IF she is indeed Madeleine McCann, then she is potentially a threat to those who have abused (?) her... Powerful people... I hope something indeed has happened to secure her release.

Yeah sorry I knew the actual definition of Rule 34. It's just when I first saw it used it was some cartoon characters I grew up with doing things I'll never forget, so I mentioned that instead.

I smell bs. 4chan is exactly the place i would expect this kind of thing from so I'm skeptical.