It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Hefficide
reply to post by wakeUpOrDie
The same Geert Wilders who was called the Netherlands "most inflammatory public figure"?
Source
[edit on 9/3/10 by Hefficide]
Originally posted by LarryLove
reply to post by wakeUpOrDie
And we all know what Geert stands for. Please my friend, there's no need to bring far right propaganda into this.
I will decide what's true and Geert is well off the mark.
[edit on 3-9-2010 by LarryLove]
, the Amsterdam Court of Appeal ordered his prosecution for what it said was "the incitement to hatred and discrimination".[9] Wilders was also controversially banned from entering the United Kingdom between 12 February 2009 and 13 October 2009, with the Home Office viewing his presence as a "threat to one of the fundamental interests of society".[10]
Originally posted by LarryLove
reply to post by wakeUpOrDie
Geert is another far right nut who wouldn't be happy until the world was left with just him and a few neo Nazis to keep company. This thread is about an Islamic Centre in New York, not some racist from Holland who doesn't deserve debunking.
Originally posted by maybereal11
Originally posted by LarryLove
reply to post by wakeUpOrDie
And we all know what Geert stands for. Please my friend, there's no need to bring far right propaganda into this.
I will decide what's true and Geert is well off the mark.
[edit on 3-9-2010 by LarryLove]
Well I had to look him up.
, the Amsterdam Court of Appeal ordered his prosecution for what it said was "the incitement to hatred and discrimination".[9] Wilders was also controversially banned from entering the United Kingdom between 12 February 2009 and 13 October 2009, with the Home Office viewing his presence as a "threat to one of the fundamental interests of society".[10]
en.wikipedia.org...
Sounds like a lovely fellow....
Originally posted by Hefficide
reply to post by wakeUpOrDie
Facts, like the wonderous coincidence that a brand new account pops up to spew vitriole and antagonism from the relative safety of a straw man persona?
Tell you what, I'll sit and watch until you get to the part where you're quoting Mien Kampf as apple pie Americana.
Just looking for clarity on what the prequisites are for condemning an entire religion based on the actions of a few.
Originally posted by poet1b
reply to post by maybereal11
Hard to believe that people keep going to Catholic churches and continue to give them money. At least the Catholic church is being held accountable.
How do you defend 8 year old girls are being sold into sexual slavery in Muslim countries, and the state allows it?
Just looking for clarity on what the prequisites are for condemning an entire religion based on the actions of a few.
This isn't the actions of a few? State sponsored terrorism means a whole lot of people joining in these actions.
How do you condone killing girls for going to school?
Blowing up a school full of children?
Hard to have tolerance for people who share a religion with others who carry out such atrocities in the name of that religion.
Originally posted by Hefficide
reply to post by wakeUpOrDie
Heff is my real name, and it's also the username and profile I post with Always.
Originally posted by LarryLove
reply to post by wakeUpOrDie
Are you using ATS as a dating site or to debate?
I am just a little confused at this point?