2 UFO photos daytime

My friend,

Many thanks again

Originally posted by ufosbri
My problem with orbs is that you only get that effect at night or dusk and using the flash to highlight dust particals or rain droplets.

In my pic its durring the day with no flash being used. so it kinda rules that out.

cheers for you time.

ORB picture taken in daylight, with no flash, and its a sky shot >



Another, though not so much during the day but NOT dark, twilight if you will. Again, no flash is being used >



A few more >



ORB's can appear at anytime and can be recorded via imagery without the need for flash.

Like I said before, I'm not saying the anomoly in your image is an ORB, I'm just pointing out that it resembles that of a NON solid object

Many thanks again, ufosbri

Be safe be well

Spiro

reply to post by Spiro


Thanks spiro

There a few nice photos there If you look at the phots of these orbs You can see there close to the camera mabe a couple of feet away. You can see through them interesting though diffrent colors. theres allways more than one with different colours pink orange or just clear.

My point being there not in the clouds a few thousand feet up.

I dont think any of them look similar but interesting.

cheers bud at least someone is trying to get to the bottom of this.

I wonder if all those orbs from light waves can prove the sound wave in the
ether theory of Tesla instead of the EM wave of Maxwell and the Illuminati's
improper use of the wave equation.
By the mere fact that Tesla made non EM waves and his ship would
use such a suspension as he said was similar to light waves we see
the same effect surrounding his ships.
Its that simple folks.
We are dealing with the same animal in light and Tesla waves in
his ship.

reply to post by TeslaandLyne


I dont really understand that mate.

But cheers anyway.

all the best.

My friend,

Originally posted by ufosbri
cheers bud at least someone is trying to get to the bottom of this.

No prob's maman, all we can do is try different alternative's eh? lol

Many thanks for the feedback, much appreciated indeed

Back to the drawing board

Be safe be well

Spiro

My friend,

Originally posted by TeslaandLyne
I wonder if all those orbs from light waves can prove the sound wave in the
ether theory of Tesla instead of the EM wave of Maxwell and the Illuminati's
improper use of the wave equation.
By the mere fact that Tesla made non EM waves and his ship would
use such a suspension as he said was similar to light waves we see
the same effect surrounding his ships.
Its that simple folks.
We are dealing with the same animal in light and Tesla waves in
his ship.

Are you familur with www.confused.com ? Im now a member of such site because what you wrote went right over my head

Can you please explain, perhaps in laymans terms?

Many thanks,

Be safe be well

Spiro

Originally posted by Spiro
My friend,

Originally posted by TeslaandLyne
I wonder if all those orbs from light waves can prove the sound wave in the
ether theory of Tesla instead of the EM wave of Maxwell and the Illuminati's
improper use of the wave equation.
By the mere fact that Tesla made non EM waves and his ship would
use such a suspension as he said was similar to light waves we see
the same effect surrounding his ships.
Its that simple folks.
We are dealing with the same animal in light and Tesla waves in
his ship.

Are you familur with www.confused.com ? Im now a member of such site because what you wrote went right over my head

Can you please explain, perhaps in laymans terms?

Many thanks,

Be safe be well

Spiro

I doubt that ever happening.
A photographer should know about light.
Well perhaps now days who cares just point and click and look at orbs.
Maxwell said the double space and time changes of a wave should be
sideways to the travel and Tesla said there is a forward pressure only.
I don't know how to prove ether makes an orb in a photo.
But I assume Tesla use the pressure wave and thus I assume an
orb making device if Tesla made a ship to be photographed in the air
there might be some orb activity.
Since orbs appear without a Tesla ship I assume the wave characteristics
are the same.
Or proving a lot of orbs can take place does not disprove an orb making
Tesla ship does not exist.

Originally posted by ufosbri
reply to post by TeslaandLyne

 

I dont really understand that mate.

But cheers anyway.

all the best.

Your welcome but I must have put some logic into the last post.
Check it out you two.

I saw this from Scotland:

edinburgh international airport over gorebridge 2 ufos filmed

So its busy up there.

reply to post by TeslaandLyne


Hello there I know this guy from Edinburgh Hes been a ufo watcher for a few years on youtube Hes got a few interesting things.

cheers for that.

reply to post by GoldenBuddha84


Another off topic post whats your problem mate.

No answer to what it is makes you angry does it.

100% ufo picture how does that make you feel.

No won has come up with an explanion YET.

I've been wondering what a little tiny highland midge would look like if you took it's picture at dusk with a flash on and it was about 10 feet away from the camera? I think your photo looks more like that than an alien craft. Whatever it is, it's nothing to get excited about. Sorry. Second photo most likely a teeny tiny drop of water on your lens.

reply to post by wigit


A highland migy I dont live in the highlands anyway,

Care to show me a water droplet in a photo that was on the lens, Im sure you can set that up to compare photos.

Cheers

reply to post by ufosbri


You're right and I'm wrong. My apologies. It isn't a speck of water on the lens because it's too small. However, I've looked up my old photo file and found this. (and it's not rain) Would you agree both of your pics have anomalies very similar to the stuff in this one?

[img]http://[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/01e2716e3b79.jpg[/img]

reply to post by wigit


Your picture shows orbs close to the camera theres a couple there that look like orbs in my first photo but nothing like the second pic,
its not close to the camera its in the clouds.
Do you see any double circles or triple, in your photo of the orbs.

Cheers

Originally posted by ufosbri
... nothing like the second pic ..

What *precisely* is so difficult to understand about the fact that bokeh appearance will vary depending on the lens, and that no-one can possibly accurately duplicate the effect that your obviously defective camera gives (except you)?

Apart from the examples that have already been posted, here's an example of ring bokeh:
www.tomiandmichael.com...

And you know what, ufosbri.. it is NOT up to us to educate those with terminal photographic ignorance.

If you were serious about capturing ufos, you would:
- get a decent camera
- learn how to properly use it
- learn about photographic concepts from those who know more than you (that would be pretty well everyone else on this thread)

There is no sign of you doing any of that, so... Buhbye.

And here's one of mine:


Start at ~1:30, and read the notes and watch carefully.

Originally posted by ufosbri
reply to post by GoldenBuddha84

 

Another off topic post whats your problem mate. No answer to what it is makes you angry does it. 100% ufo picture how does that make you feel. No won has come up with an explanion YET.

Ufosbri.....

100% ufo picture how does that make you feel.

If it was a "100% ufo picture", that would make me feel "extremely big time you da man woo hoo!" happy.

Unfortunately it's 0% "ufo picture".

No won has come up with an explanion YET.

Yes we have.....over & over & over & over & over & over & over.....

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not

1st one, its a bird, its a plane, its not an alien from planet krypton.
But there's always a slim chance.

2nd one is a cam malfunction.