It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Yissachar1
reply to post by Baloney
No that was Semiramus's husbands name... The name"Yeshua" and his person was greatly anticipated by the ancients, as the one who would save was interwoven in many cultures...
The book of Enoch names Him by His name over and again...
Semiramus and her hubby who built Babylon knew His name too yet subverted it...
His Name is in the Tanakh...
It ain't Jesus...
Its Yeshua
Originally posted by Ace High
reply to post by Yissachar1
I seriously doubt that God is going to play the semantics game.
I mean really?
Originally posted by Yissachar1
reply to post by Baloney
No that was Semiramus's husbands name... The name"Yeshua" and his person was greatly anticipated by the ancients, as the one who would save was interwoven in many cultures...
The book of Enoch names Him by His name over and again...
Semiramus and her hubby who built Babylon knew His name too yet subverted it...
His Name is in the Tanakh...
It ain't Jesus...
Its Yeshua
Originally posted by Yissachar1
Originally posted by Ace High
reply to post by Yissachar1
I seriously doubt that God is going to play the semantics game.
I mean really?
You call it semantics, I call it exact... The cure... Yeshua... Or IAM SAVIOUR... No man of zeus... or wrongcough medicine...
Originally posted by Hefficide
Moses?
Moshe?
Either way, it doesn't change the law or the implications of that law.
I think that you're overthinking this way too much.