Dr. talks about his 92% cancer cure rate on C2C AM

Cancer Cures

On Coast to Coast AM tonight

Dr. Leonard Coldwell talks about his 92% cancer cure rate and why he believes chemotherapy, radiation, and mammograms cause cancer.


Leonard Coldwell is considered as one of the leading authorities of self-help education for cancer patients and is called by many authorities the world leading expert on cancer. Dr. Leonard Coldwell is the most endorsed holistic and alternative doctor. His cure rate for so called incurable diseases in Europe is legendary.After sixteen years as a General Practitioner in Europe, Dr. Coldwell left general practice to concentrate on his applied research in stress and stress related diseases, with particular emphasis on cancer and other "incurable" diseases.

His Website:

drleonardcoldwell.com...

Why does this not have more stars and flags?? You got them from me, but more people need to be made aware of this stuff! Him and Dr. Mercola are excellent resources on health and how to take care of yourself. Maybe this thread isn't getting the love since everyone is still ogling IgnoranceIsntBliss's epic post, which is awesome and a fantastic overview of things you can do to reduce cancer's chances in your body. Thanks for this zzombie! I'll be reading Coldwell's site for a while.

reply to post by zzombie


heard it, it was a good show, hell they had james cameron (avatar/the abyss.) on the first hour, pretty cool.

the dr sounded spot on.

some things i noted, the dr is sending a pdf to anyone who signs up as a coasttocoast listener on the drs website for a day or two. i did and will try to upload the pdf once i get it.

the dr clams the pdf is illegal to talk about on the radio, or news or otherwise.

the dr i think claimed that his book is the top selling book since it came out, i dont know about that though.

he said very many members of his family died from cancer and had cancer until he came along,

and as mentioned in the op, he stood by his cure rate, he said every time he failed it wasnt his fault it was because of chemotherapy the patient was ALSO getting.

he talked alot about ph level of the body, diet, green juices oxidizing you for the better, an alkaline ph level is best to fight cancer, he encourages people to buy a ph detector and some other kinda of test for heavy metals in the body,

he also mentioned food grade hydrogen peroxide is really good for you,

he also claimed that doctors in the medical profession have the lowest age of death average out of any profession, also that doctors have the worst percentage of drug and alcohol abusers, and below that 2nd and third in place is dentists and phsycologists,

funny, people we trust for our health tend to have the worst.

Well I live in Europe, my mother is a oncologist, and I haven't heard about this man's mythical healing powers or whatever, so he's not as famous here as he'd like to say he is.

Remember, if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. If this man can in fact cure 92% of all cancer cases, why isn't he publishing his findings in peer-reviewed medical journals and spreading this knowledge on something more mainstream than Coast 2 Coast AM/?

He can say whatever he likes about the bias against him that doctors would have, but the truth is simple that the vast majority of medical professionals first and foremost care about helping people. If he really does have this absolutely exceptional and nearly miraculous success rate against cancer he should be going through the accepted channels within the medical community to disseminate his findings.

What he is doing instead has strong undertones of sensationalism, self-promotion and hucksterism. He may sound great, but he still has to prove he is anything more than an old-school snake oil salesman.

Thanks so much for listing this, saves me the trouble of looking it up. I woke to the discussion in the middle of the night and enjoyed it so much, will plan to use his techniques to get rid of most of the acid in my system and create a balanced harmony within.

Excellent....

Originally posted by ProjectJimmy

If this man can in fact cure 92% of all cancer cases, why isn't he publishing his findings in peer-reviewed medical journals and spreading this knowledge on something more mainstream than Coast 2 Coast AM/?

Curing diseases don't make money for Big Pharma & they have their hands in controlling the peer reviewed journals.

Originally posted by zzombie

Originally posted by ProjectJimmy

If this man can in fact cure 92% of all cancer cases, why isn't he publishing his findings in peer-reviewed medical journals and spreading this knowledge on something more mainstream than Coast 2 Coast AM/?

Curing diseases don't make money for Big Pharma & they have their hands in controlling the peer reviewed journals.

Curing cancer wouldn't lead to big money? Are you serious? We're talking about the number one killer of human beings after heart disease. Also this is not a proactive cure but a reactive treatment, that means that everyone will still need this no matter what.

Now to insinuate that profit motive trumps all in health care is a very narrow and false view of the system as a global whole. Sure, in the United States the industry has become a cesspool of greed at certain levels, but what about the UK, or Canada or any other nation with a nationalized system? A fix such as this if it works, which it has not in any way been proven to as of yet, would save the world's governments billions every year not only in medicines, but in man-hours, equipment and overhead.

To say the profit motive is the sole reason that this man has not published in a peer-reviewed journal shows a remarkable amount of ignorance on your part of how the medical community works across the globe.

Originally posted by ProjectJimmy
Curing cancer wouldn't lead to big money? Are you serious? We're talking about the number one killer of human beings after heart disease. Also this is not a proactive cure but a reactive treatment, that means that everyone will still need this no matter what.

Unfortunately zzombie is correct.

Big pharma would never use something that can cure you in a cost effective manor when they can make far more "their" way.

Never forget that big pharma is big BUSINESS first and as long as BUSINESS comes first they are happy.

My grandfather is currently undergoing chemo for colon cancer. If it doesn't work I will give him this website next, but I will let him finish his "medically advised" treatments first.

I remember watching a documentary on the evils of Big Pharma and the speaker(can't remember his name) said that Pharma knows, if the body is alkaline, a person can't get cancer. An alkaline body prevents cancer, and it's a serious problem that most people have an acidic chemistry due to fast foods and not eating wholesome, organic fruits and veggies.

Originally posted by peck420

Originally posted by ProjectJimmy
Curing cancer wouldn't lead to big money? Are you serious? We're talking about the number one killer of human beings after heart disease. Also this is not a proactive cure but a reactive treatment, that means that everyone will still need this no matter what.

Unfortunately zzombie is correct.

Big pharma would never use something that can cure you in a cost effective manor when they can make far more "their" way.

Never forget that big pharma is big BUSINESS first and as long as BUSINESS comes first they are happy.

My grandfather is currently undergoing chemo for colon cancer. If it doesn't work I will give him this website next, but I will let him finish his "medically advised" treatments first.

Poor guy! My younger sister went through it twice and i think it's only a person's will to live that brings them through it. Chemo kills everything in it's path and lowers the immune system, so it's very hard for the body to restore it's immune system. Medical science should support the immune system; not try to destore it.

I refuse to listen to that jackass George Noory. If this guy's got other material I'll consider taking a look, but .. I'll never listen to another C2C show again. Noory is a con-artist.

Originally posted by ProjectJimmy
the truth is simple that the vast majority of medical professionals first and foremost care about helping people.

^ ya...right....sure you go ahead and keep believing the propaganda oh yeah and greed isnt real dont forget that piece of lie.

Originally posted by ProjectJimmy

If this man can in fact cure 92% of all cancer cases, why isn't he publishing his findings in peer-reviewed medical journals and spreading this knowledge on something more mainstream than Coast 2 Coast AM/?

Curing cancer wouldn't lead to big money? Are you serious? We're talking about the number one killer of human beings after heart disease.

To say the profit motive is the sole reason that this man has not published in a peer-reviewed journal shows a remarkable amount of ignorance on your part of how the medical community works across the globe.

out of your statements to specifiy the ones i've qouted, i feel this only shows your own ignorance,

are you surprised that the insult and finger you pointed got pointed back, thats the nature of insulting and the reason why it pays to be polite,

if your wondering how legitimate this guy is then go research him, dont sit here and say well he's probly this and he's probly that, all the while asking us about him,

you obviously dont know much about him as you stated in your first post so before insulting him and everyone here with an interest in his practice, then perhaps you should first learn about him if you care so much,

or perhaps you only care about the insulting part.

to be clear. i hope to god you or someone you know Never get cancer.

but in the chance that you do i hope you come around and consider some of the things this doc says,

despite any of your claims or how you or others feel, i know the doc is being truthful, only because nothing he said was new to me, i knew of all his techniques from many different sources in practice, so i can vouch for the things he said. not that that makes any difference to you, as it shouldnt for the same reason nothing you've said has made a difference to me either,

which again is why i say go research him first, present something more solid, and if you wouldnt mind try not to be so insulting about it.

Originally posted by unityemissions
I refuse to listen to that jackass George Noory. If this guy's got other material I'll consider taking a look, but .. I'll never listen to another C2C show again. Noory is a con-artist.

ya i wouldnt be surprised, but regardless, i dont listen to that show to hear him, i listen to that show to hear everyone else that gets on it, which is the point of the show after all, if it was just noory sittin there talkin all the time by himself with no one to interview they woulda gone outta business a looong time ago.

you put a whistleblower and a disinfo agent in the same room and ask them questions your gonna get conflictions your gonna get lies, but your also gonna get truth, dont listen if you dont have faith in yourself to sort out the one from the other,

but otherwise, thats what we do all the time when we watch news or visit any website, sort lies from truth.


i tell you though sometimes noory realy chaps my hide too. but being the kinda radiohead he is thats inevitable for him.

[edit on 25-8-2010 by pryingopen3rdeye]

[edit on 25-8-2010 by pryingopen3rdeye]

Ah, yes. Dr. Leonard Coldwell. Well if he's good enough for Kevin Trudeau, he's good enough for me.

You can buy his snake oil here.
www.ktradionetwork.com...

Originally posted by Phage
Ah, yes. Dr. Leonard Coldwell. Well if he's good enough for Kevin Trudeau, he's good enough for me.

You can buy his snake oil here.
www.ktradionetwork.com...

am i to assume you are implieing that you have a dislike for kevin? no biggy, but are you also implieing that anyone with association to the man must also be bad?

or do you have some other reasoning for your dislike of coldwell, besides one of his associations?

btw the snake oil reference, coldwell claimed while on the show that he does not profit off of this, any income that does occur goes to charitys (i know right, how to believe that), well i dont but my point is he said it, is there some way to acquire proof?

honest question.

reply to post by pryingopen3rdeye

Trudeau turns my stomach. Any endorsement by him puts the endorsee in the same bucket.

Coldwell, no profit from anything he sells. Right. What a wonderful human being.

reply to post by pryingopen3rdeye


To check back in on this topic,
any luck with that PDF?
I'd be very interested to read it!

Originally posted by Phage
Trudeau turns my stomach. Any endorsement by him puts the endorsee in the same bucket.

you know if you truly held to that ideology then everyone in the world would be in the same bucket, we are all tied to each other one way or another, that whole small world thing, your friend of a friend turned out to be one of my friends kinda thing.

you know i hate MSM they turn my stomach, fox cnn all of them, but i wont put all of their endorsed guests into the same bucket, after all sometimes they keep their enemies closer then their friends, and just cause they publicly endorse them, doesnt always mean they like it.

Coldwell, no profit from anything he sells. Right. What a wonderful human being.

is your doubt based on a reason or is it unreasonable? im only wondering whats the reason?

Originally posted by GnosisPhoenix
reply to post by pryingopen3rdeye

 

To check back in on this topic,
any luck with that PDF?
I'd be very interested to read it!

ya i got it, sorry i forgot,

it is formed like a letter, the email it came in claims that it was an letter he had sent to one of his own family members, and i suppose it may be a variation of that, but reading it comes across as more of an automated response messege full of redirects links and websites, packaged around pretty much all the same things he said on the radio show.

i'll upload it here...

uhm... how? how do i upload a pdf to this thread? what site do you guys n gals recommend? can it be done on this sites media portal?



[edit on 25-8-2010 by pryingopen3rdeye]

reply to post by pryingopen3rdeye


I sir, am a member of the British media. Insults and having them turned are not something that surprises me in the least. I am also a product of English culture, and the insulting if idiocy is in fact something that is highly expected here.

That said, again, my mother is an oncologist, that is a doctor who specializes in treating cancer. I come from a long line of scientists, and government officials, I am well aware of how the system works and I do still stand by my assert that the vast majority of doctors, nurses, medical researchers and, in my country at least, administrators, do genuinely enter the field and practice their craft for a desire to help their fellow human being.

I understand the process by which a discovery is turned into a treatment. The idea of a "cure" as you put it does not really enter into this debate as even the idea of the so-far quack doctor in the OP is not a universal cure but instead a treatment. Even if you wish to look at this from a profit motivated standpoint, there is great potential in treatments for income.

As the quack is in fact flying in the face of current medical understanding here, the burden of proof rests with him, not the established, peer-reviewed and tested methods currently in use.

As such, I will reiterate my call for him to publish his findings for peer-review. I must also question why you, are in fact so defensive about him not doing so? What is your agenda here and your issue with medical professionals in general? I have found that usually and distrust of doctors or their methods mostly comes from a lack of knowledge rather than any actual mistreatment.