It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Hefficide
BTW your thoughts on what the universe would look like if you were much, much, much larger also applies in the micro. You could say that an atom would look a lot like a galaxy if you could shrink down small enough.
No they don't...they think our universe is spherical or a disk shape, I forget...you must be careful to distinguish between just our universe or a "space" (I think that's the best word to use) where many universes exist within, which is a multiverse.
The universe is infinate. That's what most scientists agree on.
If the "universe" (see what I mean) is infinite, than it's impossible that other Universes don't exist.
Well, if the universe is infinate, then could it be possible that another Big Bang - or maybe even a few - has happened in some distant part of this infinate universe?
Check out this thread I made a while ago. I basically talk about what you are getting into, and also in reverse, zooming in.
You could take this further of course. We have a solar system, in a cluster of our own, inside just one of millions of galaxies. Maybe the total of all our galaxies are simply a larger cluster is some massive structure, which if viewed from a great enough distance might resemble a huge galaxy? Each one of these clusters (the results of a Big Bang) Would be a single universe, which is where the 'multiverse' comes in. Problem is, where do you draw the line? This line of thinking could just go on and on, the size of these structures becoming infinate in size themselves.
Besides, the concept of "infinity" allows for an infinite number of infinite spaces within it. That's why it hurts the brain so much to think about it!
No idea what noetic science is actually, might have to look that up. Yes, that is one of my longest and most thought out threads, but also one of my first. As I've said before, take it with a grain of salt because back then my knowledge of the physics involved was a little less developed and I'd probably change a few things in it now.
I'm just about to read your paper on Enforced Logic - Reality and "Magic". Am I right in thinking this involves noetic science?
Ok, to be honest I did practice it for a period of time, and I believe I was getting small objects to move slightly on rare occasions, but 99% of the time I got nothing. As I said, my friend actually managed to witness it once, well he says he seen it, and I saw it too, and felt it move up my hand. I knew I wouldn't be able to get it on video though, and I didn't even bother trying, I haven't really tried it much since then, I sort of lost interest and started studying the Alien subject a lot after that. I still believe it's possible though, and most of what I write in that thread is still basically how I think it works.
Secondly, I noticed that it was over a year ago when you wrote it, and you never responded to the people who asked for a video... why is this?
Google Video Link |
You mean infinite? Source?
Originally posted by kai22
The universe is infinate. That's what most scientists agree on.
Most of those believe in other universes (Multiverse).
Whether the universe is infinite beyond the observable universe, or whether there are other universes beyond our universe, is unknown.
The comoving distance from Earth to the edge of the visible universe (also called the particle horizon) is about 14 billion parsecs (46.5 billion light-years) in any direction
The visible universe is thus a sphere with a diameter of about 28 billion parsecs (about 93 billion light-years)
Q: Is a flat universe necessarily infinite in spatial extent?
A: We don't know, but most scientists believe on the basis of imperfect evidence that space is not infinite. It is certainly the case that the universe is not *necessarily* infinite, either in spatial or indeed in temporal extent.
Originally posted by kai22
reply to post by Arbitrageur
I didn't use a source. To be fair, I didn't think I needed one (at the time anyway). Simply because I assumed that was what most people thought.
I've already been pulled up on this (thinking that most scientists believe the universe is infinite) in this thread, did you read the replies?
Originally posted by CHA0S
reply to post by kai22
No they don't...they think our universe is spherical or a disk shape, I forget...
The universe is infinate. That's what most scientists agree on.
I already answered that, we don't know. If Michio Kaku is right, and the universe appears nearly flat but it's really not, then if you keep heading in one direction, it might be like heading in one direction around the Earth, you might never reach the end and may end up right where you started. But we have no evidence for this shape, just Michio Kaku's opinion.
Plus, as you rightly pointed out, you're first source only talks about the 'visible universe', what's past what we can see? I was talking about the universe/multiverse as a whole.
Also, if the universe is not infinite, then how does it end? What comes after that end?