It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ChemBreather
Well, Nasa thinks that crustal shifts are impossible and have never happend, yet we are taught the Pangea Theory !!
Go figure !!
Originally posted by hippomchippo
Originally posted by ChemBreather
Well, Nasa thinks that crustal shifts are impossible and have never happend, yet we are taught the Pangea Theory !!
Go figure !!
The pangaea theory doesn't rely on crustal shifts.
Originally posted by ChemBreather
Originally posted by hippomchippo
Originally posted by ChemBreather
Well, Nasa thinks that crustal shifts are impossible and have never happend, yet we are taught the Pangea Theory !!
Go figure !!
The pangaea theory doesn't rely on crustal shifts.
Wow, this thread have had zero replies for hours, I was expeting Phage really , but...
Okey. I was wrong, sorry..
The conts. move ontop of the crust ...
“In crossing the Cordillera of the Andes Mr. Darwin found petrified trees, embedded in sandstone, six or seven thousand feet above the level of the sea: and at twelve or thirteen thousand feet above the sea-level he found fossil sea-shells, limestone, sandstone, and a conglomerate in which were pebbles of the "rock with shells." Above the sandstone in which the petrified trees were found, is "a great bed, apparently about one thousand feet thick, of black augitic lava; and over this there [668] are at least five grand alternations of such rocks, and aqueous sedimentary deposits, amounting in thickness to several thousand feet." These wonderful alternations of the consequences of fire and flood, are, to me, indubitable proofs of that tremendous catastrophe which alone could have caused them;—of that awful combination of water and volcanic agency which is shadowed forth to our minds by the expression "the fountains of the great deep were broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened."[667-668]
Originally posted by ChemBreather
reply to post by hippomchippo
Yes, but fo the sake of it, lets say it happends, will it be an 'coincidence, or a prophecy come thru ?
Im guessing like all other things: Coincidence !
Originally posted by ChemBreather
reply to post by Danbones
Yes, I bet you in 2015 when the Earth is all turned upside down, people will come on here and say : See, 2012 was BS, yet, it has been going on for 10 years, one needs to die to thing Oh Shait, 2012 was correct...
Those bones was according to MainStream blown there by tornados..
Originally posted by hippomchippo
Originally posted by ChemBreather
reply to post by hippomchippo
Yes, but fo the sake of it, lets say it happends, will it be an 'coincidence, or a prophecy come thru ?
Im guessing like all other things: Coincidence !
If what happens? The crust of the earth suddenly violently shifts?
It won't.
There is no science behind what Clif High says.
But sure, if it does, it would be prophecy come true.
If it doesn't happen, will you stop believing in ridiculous things?
Or just skip on to the next date?
Originally posted by ChemBreather
First, Not redicules, it is like saying Earth is the only planet with life on it.
It is like saying people thousands of years ago didnt have lightbolbs and batteries...
You get the drift... Post glacial Rebound, the Land goes up while the SeaFloor gets pushed down ...
Originally posted by ChemBreather
well, having continents moving across the globe without the crust being influenced or moved is redicules...
It is like moving only the top layer of the orange peel, cant be done ..
Originally posted by hippomchippo
Originally posted by ChemBreather
First, Not redicules, it is like saying Earth is the only planet with life on it.
It is like saying people thousands of years ago didnt have lightbolbs and batteries...
You get the drift... Post glacial Rebound, the Land goes up while the SeaFloor gets pushed down ...
No, it isn't at all like saying Earth is the only planet with life on it.
Just because people have ridiculed ideas that were accurate in the past doesn't mean there aren't ridiculous ideas.