It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Replacement fertility is the total fertility rate at which newborn girls would have an average of exactly one daughter over their lifetimes. In more familiar terms, women have just enough babies to replace themselves. The replacement fertility rate is roughly 2.1 births per woman for most industrialized countries (2.075 in the UK for example), but ranges from 2.5 to 3.3 in developing countries because of higher mortality rates.[4] Taken globally, the total fertility rate at replacement is 2.33 children per woman. - en.wikipedia.org...
There is wide variability both in the definition and in the proposed size of the Earth's carrying capacity, with estimates ranging from less than 1 to 1000 billion (1 trillion). Around two-thirds of the estimates fall in the range of 4 billion to 16 billion (with unspecified standard errors), with a median of about 10 billion. - en.wikipedia.org...
It's your type of thinking that makes me think human kind truly is some kind of virus..."spread and multiple"...go ahead and plumage and destroy the Earth...I couldn't care less anymore, dirty humans can live on a dirty planet, it suites them.
Overpopulation give me a break. Lets make more jobs by developing undeveloped land and spread the hell out.
Inequality is only one part of the problem. Money doesn't solve everything.
Well when you come up with a fantastic plan to save all us degenerates let someone with a quadrillion bucks know so we can all have a happy existence.
Originally posted by CHA0S
reply to post by snowen20
Well Chaos I apologize if I came off sounding as though I were implying that you planned to allow the deaths of people, Sincerely.
I suspect that if a child regulations policy were somehow globally enforced it would undoubtedly lead to a more derogatory form of control. it is all ways a slippery slope as history has shown. I guess that's where my aggravation comes from on the issue. It's not directed toward you so let me apologize to you yet again for what may have seemed like cutting remarks.
I just don't see how it can be improved. unless you are living in a mud hut Not driving a vehicle and not consuming anything massed produced, then according to someone you are that virus of which you speak. Look I'm all for wearing Hemp clothing and singing around the camp fire but the fact is Money does by almost everything. Including opinions, and those who have the money have the power.
In the end the only people to suffer are those virus types at the bottom of the totem pole. That sadly to say Chaos is you and me both. That is where my concern lies in talk about overpopulation. That some one with money will get a "good" idea and then we are all screwed.
Anyway I have to go do some cardio. Once again no hard feelings I see where your coming from I really do.
[edit on 17-8-2010 by snowen20]
[edit on 17-8-2010 by snowen20]
[edit on 17-8-2010 by snowen20]
No...the people of which I speak promote ideas like this:
Originally posted by snowen20
unless you are living in a mud hut Not driving a vehicle and not consuming anything massed produced, then according to someone you are that virus of which you speak.
Lets make more jobs by developing undeveloped land and spread the hell out.
The problem is with density not population.
Take 50 chickens and let them run free range and take another 50 chickens and stack them on top of each other in some industrial chicken high rise.
look around the word...and I see cities so polluted you can't see the horizon, I see the vast majority is starving and/or homeless