It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Unity_99
reply to post by Annee
you mean those videos in art, showing how to draw a circle freehand, swinging the elbow are pointless?
As an artist, I prefer things to be surreal, my style is portraits, realism that is surreal, mixed media, layered, perhaps, like a collage too, or impressionistic realism, so I prefer freehand circles, they're unique.
Originally posted by Unity_99
As for who my contacts are, I knew they were positive, for many reasons, these are the ones I call ET, and I'm after reading what Lou/Sleeper says about the solar system, and knowing there are infinite channels, I'm starting to get a sense where they come from.
Originally posted by Unity_99
reply to post by Annee
The experiences I've had which were ET from early childhood, and some memories.
You asked me if I believed in God/One. No, I don't any longer, though if one calls the Infinite Family that is progressed and outside the Universe, the Creators/Designers/Teachers God, because they need to have the Parent/child relationship, so be it. However its very strongly in my belief that they do not prefer to be called God, they don't think of themselves as God(s).
Its just that I sense an inner sorrow is the right word, something in you that is hesitant, and you'd have to know this yourself really what its about, and I don't mean hesitant about your beliefs, because I feel you have some strongly held ones, its something else. And it brings me to the question, why you would even wish to not exist? What would make you feel all are called to this sacrifice? Why is Love giving all of yourself, rather than sharing with another, in a win/win, both are happy, where you count too?
Originally posted by LeoVirgo
I use 'God' because it describes a singularity and not a plural, in its perfectness. It has no need for progression, for its perfect.
Originally posted by Unity_99
Lou Baldin, not Baldwin, sorry for the typo, its too late to correct it now. That looks so much better.
Here's a link to John Lear's favorite quotes from Sleeper/Lou Baldin, just scroll down and you will see John's Favorite Sleeper Comment pages!
Originally posted by Unity_99
reply to post by Annee
Pretty sure it was me typing the wrong spelling, just couldn't go back and edit the time window was up for that. It wasn't you, you didn't do it. It was me and there is no blushing emoticon.
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by LeoVirgo
I use 'God' because it describes a singularity and not a plural, in its perfectness. It has no need for progression, for its perfect.
I respect your reasons and beliefs - - - in the way you choose to present them.
I avoid the label "God" - - because of the negative impact of organized religion - - which I feel is man made - - mostly for political reasons.
The only time I use God (by choice) is in honoring someone like you.
I prefer Creator or "the One" - - because it fits my belief. My belief does require progression - - there is no perfection (except in the reason for Creation).
that light within, you called the Divine Light, but in essence our pure inner spring of Light, I'm connected. That seeking/searching, is no longer the push, the push now, what seems to be what is worked on, is my relations to others, and absolute appreciation for everyone and all of them as well. And to share, nudged and pushed even into shining light and planting seeds of awareness.
Why do others cling to this idea there is no center....when everything you can observe in the design of this physical existence shows a 'center'.
Some are viewing everything as REAL 100% and physical and don't realize that it's only their brain and electrical signals that are giving them a taste and picture of their reality/channel/station they live in.
'They miss the infinite channels/dimensions/stations beyond this tiny grain of sand universe and they also miss how they are truly/really perceiving their own reality which they call 'physical existence' or 'matter' which is nothing but photons and light entering into their eyes/retina than converted into electrical signals to their brain where their brain like a TV with a cable hooked to it throws a picture together for them to see and perceive their reality/existence/dimension/channel/station.
One is a Limit in Infinity, and is a Finite understanding. Both Nonlocality, and No Limit are hallmarks of Infinity. Ie. there is no measuring stick, no middle, center, or portion that can be measured, for wherever you would select, you still have an Infinity ahead, behind and in all conceivable directions. And also, If you were to place one Huge Circle on a blank piece of paper, and imagine this is One, there is no point even, of imagining this One is endless and goes beyond the edges of the paper, for it is a symbol of One Consciousness/Object. If One Consciousness Is Aware of Itself as One, that is a Limit. There must be Infinite One's, and in zero time/no time, Infinite one's in segments or clips/portions of that infinite journey, within that One.
The mountain is in your mind, not in the Horizon, the chair is in your mind, not supporting you at all. There is no chair, there is no mountain, there is no moon, either. This is a hologram, and there are infinite channels/densities, if we have 3d, that means, infinite more and space-time channels based on orbit where there is no orbit.
Originally posted by LeoVirgo
Hi Annee
Just to clarify where you are coming from. You said that there is no perfection except in the 'reason' for creation....so do you find that this 'creator/the one/emanator....is not perfect? As expression/creations OF Thee...we need progression to of course....but what I was saying was that the creator/the one/emanator/god (if you will) does not 'create' to progress in itself...for it has no need to progress...it is infinite without beginning and end.
LV
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by LeoVirgo
Hi Annee
Just to clarify where you are coming from. You said that there is no perfection except in the 'reason' for creation....so do you find that this 'creator/the one/emanator....is not perfect? As expression/creations OF Thee...we need progression to of course....but what I was saying was that the creator/the one/emanator/god (if you will) does not 'create' to progress in itself...for it has no need to progress...it is infinite without beginning and end.
LV
I see that as religious jargon.
I see it more scientifically - I guess. An energy evolved into consciousness - - intelligent consciousness - - that creates by thought energy.
How perfect are your thoughts? Do you experiment with your thoughts? Are all your thoughts positive? If you created something from purity - would it remain pure through ions of incarnations?
I think we are under the control of sub-creators. That we are so far removed from the innocence and purity of The Creator - - - its not really reasonable to think at this time of returning to the ultimate beginnings.
Having my own thoughts in order is my primary goal - - - for advancement to a higher evolved world/society.
Its like the question: "what is Love" - - - - "what is Perfection"?
Originally posted by LeoVirgo
reply to post by Unity_99
Unity....Ill be straight up with you. I think that video...is made by a very dark group of beings.
There are many things about the video that dont make sense. Sure...the world is 'compressed energy'. The further down the line of 'emanation' the more compressed and fine tuned energy becomes and hence us, as energy consciousness...is the later in this 'energy world'. It IS all energy.....but that does not make it 'technical energy' like computers ect like what that video implies (lifeless is what it implies/absent of Spirit) and a soul would take a lot longer to find its way/its true self/what its a part of.....if a soul takes the divine life of all things out of it.
There is no way around clearing one's karmic record through other people's actions as suggested above. Consequence to action or (karma) as people define it to be is based on each individual's personal life choices/decisions - experiences/actions.