posted on Aug, 16 2010 @ 01:23 PM
Originally posted by woodwytch
Just wondering why this post has been removed for being 'off-topic' when I was actually suggesting an alternative explanation for the OP's original
explanation
I thought the idea of a discussion thread was to debate the topic from all sides ... I'm pretty sure my post could not be classified as offensive
Are you (the MOD who removed this post) saying that to suggest the cause of the dancing tree was an effect that is normal to Quaking Aspen and not a
spiritual experience or evidence of God is against the T&C's of ATS
Have the other posters who made a similar suggestion had their posts removed too ... and if not ... why not
At the risk of having this post removed too (even though it is relevent to the threads discussion content), I'm afraid I have to stand by my original
statement and suggest that the movement of the tree in the video included in the OP is the result of the type of tree (Quaking Aspen) ... now if I'm
wrong so be it ... but does naming the wrong type of tree really warrent the removal of a post
If so then maybe you could send me a u2u telling me who I need to complain to ... because I genuinely do not understand why a post would be removed
for such an apparently appalling offense
Sorry for the rant (about the subject of the thread) but I really am bemused to understand this action. Maybe I'm just having an attack of the
'stupids' and completely missing the point.
As a final comment might I suggest that you and the other MODS are this dilligent on the increasing number of threads that seem to be allowed to run
riot.
Woody