a new theory

Have any of you thought that maybe al qaeda is behind this? no probably not? honestly neither do i. But look at the motives behind it. Since america is depedant on oil, al qaeda bombed the oil rig so more of americas money will go to the middle east instead of to domestic oil companies, thus we practically fund them. Now what if al qaeda took out like 4 or 5 of these oil rigs? We would start paying the middle east even more money than we already are. al qaeda could easily funnel more money towards them by blowing up some oil rigs and at the same time damage americas home turf with the spilled oil. Maybe not what happened here but it is most certainly possible in the future.

reply to post by smokn442

If al qaeda had bombed the oil rig then surely the government would have surely used this story for propaganda purposes rather then blaming it on BP.
Imagine what a great story it would be for them "Al Qaeda Destroy Gulf Coast".

i know they didnt, but there would be plenty of reason for them to do it. It would provide them with more chance to get money from america from oil, especially if they took out 3 or 4 rigs.

S$F for the bravery to bring this to light, what if it is, how /could, we the US, defend all oil rigs, and why has now one mentioned / thought of, a nuclear reactor on the rig, one of this size should have one, or am i wrong. Just a thought.

Since Al Queda is an illuminati/ CIA fiction, it's fair to say that al queda is not responsible. If a foreign power had in mind what you suggested in order to make the USA more dependant on foreign oil, they would hit the production wells. That BP well was just an exploritory well not a production well that is responsible for the tallied market supply. None of the oil from the broken BP well had an effect on the North American supply because no oil from that well had been refined yet.

reply to post by smokn442


No disrespect here but No! The boogeyman did not do this.

Unless you believe that the PTB is Al Qaeda, then yes.