It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by sweetliberty
reply to post by ~Lucidity
You have about as many threads on here as NY has mosques, which is 90 plus mosques so why don't you allow us to discuss this, please go to your many homes Luc.
Originally posted by neo96
kiddies play nice nough with the bickering
[edit on 3-8-2010 by neo96]
Originally posted by intrepid
Originally posted by neo96
www.infoplease.com...
theres a short list of bombings/attacks on the us.
exception of mcveigh home grown idiot.
[edit on 3-8-2010 by neo96]
I only saw 1. That in 1993. The others were mainly in the middle east. Yes, they may have been against US forces, such as Lebanon but are you saying that the terrorist fly to NY to plan attacks over there? If not the whole premise of this thread has been shown for what it is.
Originally posted by sweetliberty
Originally posted by neo96
kiddies play nice nough with the bickering
[edit on 3-8-2010 by neo96]
neo I asked the mods if this could be a thread of discussions and not attacks, Im waiting for a response so hang in there.
We have questions and others try to turn it into a christian thing
Originally posted by neo96
www.infoplease.com...
theres a short list of bombings/attacks on the us.
exception of mcveigh home grown idiot.
[edit on 3-8-2010 by neo96]
Originally posted by sweetliberty
reply to post by ~Lucidity
As I mentioned before, its about how they avoid the issue of funding Luc.
Just because you dont like my answer doesnt mean you can continue to badger me on the same question.
Originally posted by ~Lucidity
Are churches or synagogues or any private building, for that matter, bound by law to disclose those who contribute to them or building them?
Originally posted by sweetliberty
reply to post by ~Lucidity
No Luc! NO!
I will not respond to you at all! Do not respond to me either, I would like to hear what neo is saying. Thank you!
Originally posted by neo96
people always bring up the crusades
people always bring up christainity.
correct me of im wrong here:
it wasnt christians who flew 3 planes into buildings now was it?
this isnt about christianity anyways.
MY PROBLEM is: the radical extremist you know those people who
stone women for cheating imprisioning them for adultery
killing gays.
cutting off womens noses.
women who cant even get an education
you know people who would kill you for:
smoking weed
downloading and looking at porn
telling you u cant sleep with a woman before your married
etc.............. thats a long list
and wether you people want to believe it or not those people flock to mosques.
you people should have problems with them too and for the life of me i can not figure out why you dont.
and seriously no more about christianity/vs islam please
and for those of you who already judged me and think they know me im not religious at all.
Originally posted by Misoir
reply to post by neo96
Opinion:
The Ground Zero mosque has every right to exist in this location. If this were a Church or a Synagogue there would not be so much hell being raised.
It shows that the ignorance and intolerance coming from most on the Right and from you, the OP, is staggering. Considering that the building was legally given the green light you are complaining on a moral basis.
All this complaining implies is that you categorize an entire group of people based upon the actions of a radical few. It is ignorance, egotism, Islamophobia and intolerance combined into an argument which you, OP, and they, other Islamaphobics, justify by using 9/11 as your excuse.
[edit on 8/3/2010 by Misoir]