Sea Going Nessie??

A new Nessie wantabe has been photographed just 30 yards off the Devon coast. At first they thought it might be a sea turtle?? I have never seen a sea turtle that I would confuse with a dinosour.

"A typical plesiosaur had a long neck, four large flippers, short pointed tail and ranged from two metres to 20 metres long."


[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/a8498b6bfb13.jpg[/atsimg]

This is a small picture, but you can go to the site for a really huge one. Unfortunately, it's a Nessieblob.

www.thisisplymouth.co.uk...
What say all of you wise cryptologists?



[edit on 8/2/2010 by zachi]

can animals be both fresh water and salt water?

2nd

Isn't this being talked about just 5-6 threads down?

The ocean is one of the most undiscovered places of our world, who is to say dinosours are extinct?

maybe they are just rare and live in the deepest parts of our ocean

perhaps this is a dinosour that existed

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Already a thread here, but really it is kind of hard to tell by the photo's. It could be anything.

reply to post by Totalstranger


yes of course they can
look at salmon and trout
i know they are fish but.....................

It's Morgawr. It was first spotted in 1906.
en.wikipedia.org...
www.ufodigest.com...

reply to post by pazcat


Oops, I didn't look far enough down the page. Nessie was the first cryptid I learned about. I don't know what's out there, but it sure is facinating.

There are many things in the oceans we have not yet discovered.

reply to post by Totalstranger


Hey its my first post.. yay! anywho. I remember seeing a few things that are both fresh water and salt water fish. I am going to reference a what i found.

"For most fish, they would die. But some, like eels and salmon, can move
freely between the two at certain stages of their lives. To do this they have special
mechanisms of excretion and absorption of salt and water.--ProfBill" (website) www.newton.dep.anl.gov...

Now i thought snake head fish would be the same but i did some research they are fresh water fish that can travel on land. Pretty scary imo. But i know there is a shark out there that is both. But for the life of me i cant remember its name! bah. but yes some can

Another cliche' blurry sea creature surrounded in myth and lore.

Listen, the images (now I use the term images lightly) can show one of many of the ridiculous numbers of existing forms of sea life. And it's obvious that nearly all of those animals would be more probable than a surviving prehistoric marine reptile. just because a blurry photo shows up out of nowhere doesn't mean we have discovered a prehistoric survivor, come on people.

Tell me how many photos that look almost identical to these have been debunked? and not just by professional photo analysts but by you?

denying these photos as any proof of a prehistoric marine reptile is not ignorant, it's realistic.

Originally posted by Kroggin
reply to post by Totalstranger

 

Now i thought snake head fish would be the same but i did some research they are fresh water fish that can travel on land. Pretty scary imo. But i know there is a shark out there that is both. But for the life of me i cant remember its name! bah. but yes some can

That's a Bull Shark mate

I think that the Loch Ness Monster is most likely deceased. RIP Nessie!