It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
O.K. America, Exactly HOW does one protect the Constitution
against Domestic Enemies?
Originally posted by Megiddodiddo
An action of the physical type, to remove the offensive individuals and offensive legislations, and then try those individuals for treason and then publicly execute them for thier crimes?
Is covert government a Constitutionally viable form of assaulting Constitutional Principles, freedoms, and laws?
YES, IT IS! ....
God Save America!
O.K. America, Exactly HOW does one protect the Constitution
against Domestic Enemies?
Originally posted by boondock-saint
reply to post by Megiddodiddo
O.K. America, Exactly HOW does one protect the Constitution
against Domestic Enemies?
The National Archives Increases Security in the Washington, DC Area
New security procedures have been implemented at the National Archives in College Park in the wake of the terrorist attacks in New York City and the Pentagon on September 11, 2001.
The changes at College Park are similar to those that have been in place at the National Archives Building in Washington since May 1, 2001. Those changes followed a comprehensive review of existing practices and are bringing our security procedures in line with those at other Federal buildings of similar function and size.
National Archives at College Park
The only access to the public and the staff-only areas of the National Archives at College Park will be through doors in the main lobby, where an "airport-style" security procedure has been instituted. All visitors are required to pass through magnetometers. All packages, briefcases, and personal belongings must pass through an x-ray scanner.
Researchers and visitors approaching the building from Adelphi Road must stop at the first guard station and be prepared to show photo-identification. A NARA photo researcher card is the preferred form of identification, but a driver's license or other form of photo-identification is acceptable.
The cafeteria and adjoining patio remains open for use by the public.
Emergency call boxes on each of the three levels of the parking garage are now in service. The blue light on the top of the unit identifies the call boxes. Pushing the red button puts the user in immediate contact with the guard office.
National Archives Building in Washington
The security arrangements at the National Archives Building in Washington are unchanged from those instituted on May 1. Visitors entering the building from Pennsylvania Avenue will pass through the magnetometer and send personal belongings through the x-ray scanner.
After you have gone through entry screening, a security officer will give you an appropriate temporary NARA-issued identification. It must be worn at all times. It will indicate the areas of the building you are authorized to use for your work or visit.
Microfilm researchers will get a green ID card; textual researchers will get an orange metal disk to clip to clothing; and visitors (business or Government agency representatives) will get a red ID card.
Source/more: www.archives.gov...
Originally posted by hinky
I use my AUTHORITY by voting for people who have basically my point of view.
Originally posted by aspx
your CONSTITUTION is not compatible with the 21st century of thinking, its simple as that, the Law and policy always needs to be changed, same with science books some things need to be rewritten, the CONSTITUTION you are talking about is only but a paper CONSTITUTION, nothing else sorry to be so rude but that is really the truth.
Originally posted by endisnighe
Originally posted by whatukno
reply to post by endisnighe
I just got finished saying that vitriol violent lased messages to your representatives probably isn't the best way to go.
What's that old saying, you catch more flies with honey than you do vinegar.
Well not according to some people out there.
I guess the communists in our midst do not follow your rhetoric. From one of Obama's CZARS!
BLOOM: The second thing about us is we've decided to get on the field. Some unions and our union, in fact, some years ago, largely played defense in these situations. We had what we had and we tried to protect it. What we realized through long and often painful experience is that management matters, business strategy matters, capital structure matters, ownership matters. We spent a long time trying to clean up the messes that others had left us. And so now we try to create our own messes. This is more dangerous politically, it's more difficult. It has higher risk. We think it has higher reward. But in any event, in these cases where we can be on the field, you should expect to find us on the field.
Generally speaking, we get the joke. We know that the free market is nonsense. We know that the whole point is to game the system, to beat the market, or at least find someone who will pay you a lot of money because they're convinced that there is a free lunch. We know this is largely about power, that it's an adults-only, no-limit game. We kind of agree with Mao that political power comes largely from the barrel of a gun. And we get it that if you want a friend you should get a dog.
Karl Rove on GW BUSH: We recommended volumes to each other (for example, he encouraged me to read a Mao biography; I suggested a book on Reconstruction's unhappy end). We discussed the books and wrote thank-you
Originally posted by ProjectJimmy
reply to post by Megiddodiddo
Oh dear more of this Redemption Movement (I'm not even going to call you "Sovereign Citizens" anymore) insanity. How many times must you be debunked? I've tried so many times on this site to give court precedent, law and what I have gotten from interviews with experts on why exactly you are wrong, but it never ever seems to stick with anyone!
Why? Because you people want this to be true, no matter how many of you get thrown in jail for tax evasion, or contempt of court; no matter how many times you have it explained to you it just keeps going and going. What on earth makes this idea so damned seductive that it has caused people to completely disregard reality in support of it?
I'm not going to further respond because this is just too far gone a conspiracy, it has been fully debunked in every way. So I will just leave you with this quote I found in reference to the OP from the Wikipedia page on the Redemption Movement: It was said by the former director of the Fully Informed Jury Association.
"[A] maladjusted malcontent was arguing that the gold fringe around the flag made the court a maritime court. The judge invited the maladjusted malcontent to make his argument, and as he went on and on and on, the judge whispered to the bailiff, who removed the flag in its entirety. The maladjusted malcontent looked like he was about to cry..."
Source
This would be hilarious if it weren't also so sad how misinformed and delusional some Americans are about the function of their own government.