It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ledled
Mathematicians DESIGNED PKE based on the things that they have NO WAY to shortcut. "Prime factorisation" it's called, and it's one of the toughest mathematical problems in the world and has been for CENTURIES, if not MILLENIA. No-one is going to pop up and find a shortcut just-like-that, in the same manner that DVDCSS was decrypted. We're talking every mathematician in the field for the last 2000 years having worked on the problem all their lives and never making more than 0.1% difference to the outcome.
In this case, we have an encrypted file. We don't have the private key. We don't EVEN have the public key. Thus, the file is a pile of random junk, without any clues, and no amount of "guessing" or "hacking" will reveal anything. We have complete knowledge of the encryption and decryption method - it's still completely useless. We can use any of the several thousand open-source AES decryption routines (PGP is a software version) but without a public key there is nothing we can do to aid decryption. This is the POINT of a public-key encryption algorithm. EVERYONE, from me, to the mathematicians that designed it, to the US military knows HOW to decrypt it. But without the public (or private) key, we can't do a thing. There are, I hesitate to guess but let's hypothesise, "1 with 77 zeroes after it" possible keys. If we analysed a billion billion (1,000,000,000 GHz) a second, it would still take longer than the age of the universe to find the right one - assuming we knew what we were looking for.
Originally posted by EspyderMan
Originally posted by ledled
So, its not impossible, just a very lengthy process.
We humans are quite amazing at turning what seems impossible or improbable, to possible and probable.
Processing speed increases exponentially every couple of years, who is to say we won't find a way tomorrow to crack this?
Still missing the point eh?
even after the post right above yours?
Hello? This is not something we want to 'crack'.
but Im pretty sure I can say, no one will 'crack' it tomorrow. lol
the secret-spilling site has posted a mysterious encrypted file labeled “insurance.”
The huge file, posted on the Afghan War page at the WikiLeaks site, is 1.4 GB and is encrypted with AES256. The file’s size dwarfs the size of all the other files on the page combined.
Originally posted by EspyderMan
Originally posted by mryanbrown
Originally posted by muzzleflash
And NO, FOX did NOT ADMIT that NATO funds the Taliban secretly to keep the war going on perpetually and justify a continued presence there.
The US pharmaceutical addiction to opiates is what truly funds the war.
We send over US soldiers to fight the Taliban in Afghanistan.
In turn, warlords sell opium to the official government of Afghanistan.
Who in turn, then legally sell the opium to US pharmaceutical companies with a legal paper trail. Sustaining the American addiction to opiates. Which in turn, funds the warlords paying the Taliban who fight our soldiers.
This is the Military Industrial Complex, simple, and at it's finest.
Americans are supplying the soldiers fighting our own soldiers via proxy.
Good 'ol UCC, Trade Agreements, etc.
Wow, could you possible bring any cold hard facts to support this hypothesis?
Why do people try to talk as if their highly intelligent, but the content itself is pointless banter?
All your preconceived notions on the government, the military and the world in general keep you blind to the real truth. Being a hard core conspiracy buff with no proof of claims is nothing to be proud of, its something to ridicule. I sincerely doubt you have any proof of this statement, matter of fact, i think you made it all up based on other peoples assumptions about government, military and the world.
People like this make it difficult to find the truth because they dilute places like this with pointless, factless conspiracy banter.
As for this insurance file, it is exactly that. Insurance. We can all debate about what it is, but it will lead nowhere. All we can do is wait for the key, or for the cracked version to be leaked.
This is quite the game wikileaks is playing, a very dangerous one too boot. I look forward to more developments.
Originally posted by SeekerofTruth101
I think many here and hackers around the world MAY BE MISSING SOMETHING HERE?
Julian is one of us - Humanity.
[edit on 3-8-2010 by SeekerofTruth101]
Originally posted by EspyderMan
Originally posted by ledled
...There are, I hesitate to guess but let's hypothesise, "1 with 77 zeroes after it" possible keys. If we analysed a billion billion (1,000,000,000 GHz) a second, it would still take longer than the age of the universe to find the right one - assuming we knew what we were looking for.
So, its not impossible, just a very lengthy process.
We humans are quite amazing at turning what seems impossible or improbable, to possible and probable.
Processing speed increases exponentially every couple of years, who is to say we won't find a way tomorrow to crack this?
CEO of Recorded Future, Christopher Ahlberg, spoke to Wired about the project, saying: ”The cool thing is, you can actually predict the curve, in many cases – we are right there as it happens and we can assemble actual real-time dossiers on people.” Source: Google to predict the future with the CIA | Search Engine Marketing News
mkdir ramdisk
chmod 777 ramdisk
sudo mount -t tmpfs -o size=2048M tmpfs ./ramdisk
cd ./ramdisk
watch hexdump -C -n 512 out
openssl enc -d -aes256 -in insurance.aes256 -out ramdisk/out -pass pass:a-password
OR
openssl enc -d -aes256 -in insurance.aes256 -out ramdisk/out -pass pass:'a password'
sudo umount ./ramdisk
Originally posted by Faiol
www.democracynow.org...
Assange just said about the file:
it might be important assuring that important part of the history do not disappear