It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Well if it will help why don't people write the Taliban leaders and have them knock this stuff off?
Originally posted by SLAYER69
The fighting between the two groups was going long before 9/11 or the invasion. They didn't want to be apart of any Taliban ran Government ooz.
Northern Alliance
The United Islamic Front for the Salvation of Afghanistan (UIF, Jabha-yi Muttahid-i Islami-yi Milli bara-yi Nijat-i Afghanistan), more commonly known as the Afghan Northern Alliance, was a military-political umbrella organization created by the Islamic State of Afghanistan in 1996. The organization united various ethnic groups of Afghanistan fighting against each other to fight the ethnic Pashtun Taliban instead.
The Northern Alliance included Tajiks, Hazaras, Uzbeks, Turkmen, Pashtuns and others. Some of these ethnic groups are Shia with smaller numbers of Ismailis.
At the crossroads of Islamic fundamentalism and westernization, especially in terms of womens status, Afghanistan provides the testing grounds for the future of hybridization. The current socio-political situation provides a basis for new insights into theoretical constructions of modernity, secularism and gender equality. The situation of women in the future of Afghanistan might challenge the dominant discourse on citizenship and feminism as defined by the West and provide to non-western nations and minorities in western nations an alternative that can bring social justice and economic equality to all. For women in Afghanistan participation in the economic reconstruction of the country is essential to realize their dreams of a cohesive and peaceful nation; becoming victims of Islamic burqas and Western liberation is the least of their concern.
In Afghanistan, as in other traditional societies, women do not exist outside the family and community. Yet, family and kinship networks do not necessarily have to be destroyed in order to improve womens status through education, employment and access to resources. But they must be rearranged.
Originally posted by LadySkadi
Human Interest story or not, it does not negate the real world struggles of the women in the country, nor of the few men that would support them. Labeling it "propaganda for the American people" and leaving it there, minimizes what's happening and what they are facing and fighting. It dismisses them. Quite effectively. Not seen. Not heard. Here or there.
Originally posted by ~Lucidity
reply to post by hotbakedtater
Do you believe this is related to religion?
If so, why? I only ask because I see this as more of a cultural issue and even a human issue than a religious one, and I would like to gain a better perspective from those who believe it is religious and why.
Also, do you believe we are really there fighting for womens rights? If so, same basic questions as for the religious question.
[edit on 7/31/2010 by ~Lucidity]
No we are not fighting this war for women's rights or humans rights, I never claimed belief in any such thing.
Originally posted by ~Lucidity
reply to post by hotbakedtater
Do you believe this is related to religion?
If so, why? I only ask because I see this as more of a cultural issue and even a human issue than a religious one, and I would like to gain a better perspective from those who believe it is religious and why.
Also, do you believe we are really there fighting for womens rights? If so, same basic questions as for the religious question.
[edit on 7/31/2010 by ~Lucidity]
Are the taliban not basing their terrorism on religious laws? Maybe I misunderstand, but I thought the husband terrorizing and mutilating his wife was done based upon religious beliefs of some sort.
Originally posted by ladyinwaiting
reply to post by ~Lucidity
I was reading on the thread about Cartel Wars in our backyard, just one quarter of a mile across the U.S. border in Mexico.
I read your post on that thread. The essence of the message, was that someone visited someone in Texas, and they told somebody's aunt, or neighbor, or somebody, that people were on rooftops, slaughtering people, and that teenagers were knocking on doors in the wee-hours demanding $250.00 from poor people.
Your response (the gist) was the U.S. should get their butts over there and do something about this murderous travesties.
On this thread we have the cover of a reputable magazine, sadly illustrating what we know to be going on in Afghanistan and other areas of the ME, and yet you instantly claim it's "propaganda".
My nephew just spent a year in Afghanistan as a mentor for law enforcement, teaching Ethics. I can tell you, the stories are much worse than what is presented here. I shall spare you.
But let's see.......the neighbor's visitor in Mexico told the friend of the aunt, who in turn told ......blah blah blah.
Vs. Time Magazine with pictures.
I get the feeling that at times you think more with your heart, and whether somethings fits your own personal beliefs, than what the realities of these situations might be.
Originally posted by ladyinwaiting
My nephew just spent a year in Afghanistan as a mentor for law enforcement, teaching Ethics.