It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
It said that BlackBerry devices operate "beyond the jurisdiction" of national laws because they immediately send data abroad to be "managed by a foreign, commercial organisation.
In a nut shell, the BlackBerry service is too public to be used. Let's be rational here, how would you feel if you knew the president used a public copy of WindowsXP on all his PCs, or if he used a public copy of Internet Explorer and Outlook? How warm and fuzzy would you feel about the security of our Gov’t secrets? Of course Obama would like to keep his Blackberry, who wouldn’t? BlackBerry’s without a doubt increase the users productivity and availability. However, for most users the security of the BlackBerry solution is just an after thought. Obviously, if you are the most powerful man on the planet your security posture becomes a bit more critical (understatement of the year). In this blog I will lay out 3 major reasons why the security risk is just to great to allow President Obama to keep his beloved BlackBerry.
Originally posted by dgtempe
Well,
Aint no body gonna take my BB. I love it.
On to the next security breach.
Originally posted by TortoiseKweek
reply to post by ~Lucidity
To Lucidity and dgtempe
There is nothing wrong with BB's. I was a Nokia fan for almost 8 years, but when I got my BB here in Canada, I was converted. This is an amazing piece of tech, and why would the Pres of USA have 1, if it was insecure?? The only thing Obama has done right, is stick with BB
Originally posted by TortoiseKweek
reply to post by Athink
Maybe he knows that Canadian tech is better than US tech - Apple I-Phone has problems with connection, hold it "wrong", and no signal!!
Go RIM!