OIL expert Matt Simmons: BP Cap is a Hoax!!

Matt Simmons is insisting the American public is being duped by the Mainstream media, BP and The White House!

In an interview given July 15th on KPFK radio he says that according to information he got from NOAA that the announcement by President Obama and the capping of the riser is "The biggest con job we've ever seen"

He also goes on to say that BP's camera's are focused in on the wrong hole and that the real problem lies about 10 miles from where the real problem is where 120 000 barrel's per day are continuously spewing out.

I believe there may be some truth to what he says since it's convenient to all parties involved in the disaster. Hopefully get's people focusing on something else like Lindsay Lohan or something of that stupid nature, the timing and the subsequent stop of 'all BP all the Time' on CNN or other news networks is convenient.

The people left paying are us. The never cared anyway.

Any one have any thoughts on this report?

Here's the rest of the article and link to the radio interview.

www.johnkaminski.info...
they_are_still_lying_about_the_oil_disaster.htm

archive.kpfk.org...

PT.1

www.youtube.com...

PT.2

www.youtube.com...

If it is, we will find out sooner or later. Or maybe we won't. Maybe they ARE covering this all up and expecting nobody to notice because they figure there is going to be such devastation that it will wipe all evidence one way or the other completely off the map.

Just speculating...

Considering how people react to being taken for imbeciles, If they are covering it up like you say , they'll get away with it like they always do cause most of the American public consuming this crap won't do anything about it anyways.

they'll scream and yell on the net but that's it.

Originally posted by SubPop79
If it is, we will find out sooner or later. Or maybe we won't. Maybe they ARE covering this all up and expecting nobody to notice because they figure there is going to be such devastation that it will wipe all evidence one way or the other completely off the map.

Just speculating...

Maybe thats why they are spending money in the goverment faster than they can print it. Remember that scene from Armegeddon where steve buscemi gets a loan from the loan shark in NYC then spends it all at a strip joint. Thats our goverment.

Who is this guy? Is he floating around the bottom of the Gulf in his own private sub, after avoiding Black Water snipers and US Navy Special Forces, to report back to the BP-controlled press all the leaks BP is hiding?

This is getting silly

Originally posted by soleprobe
Who is this guy? Is he floating around the bottom of the Gulf in his own private sub, after avoiding Black Water snipers and US Navy Special Forces, to report back to the BP-controlled press all the leaks BP is hiding?

This is getting silly

He is possibly paying "tip" money for inside info. This is not uncommon. People are willing to pay for good info on just about everything. This is like the "peoples" security agency.

I guess. Even flakey and thin clairvoyant and telepath stuff is sold, tipped, or bartered for.

Originally posted by soleprobe
Who is this guy? Is he floating around the bottom of the Gulf in his own private sub, after avoiding Black Water snipers and US Navy Special Forces, to report back to the BP-controlled press all the leaks BP is hiding?

This is getting silly

Which leads me to many theories.

Combined with the tons of ppl around ATS saying "This guy has mad oil corp connections etc"; we have some very suspicious and bizarre events unfolding.

What we are seeing here is the classic shell game.

I am at the point I don't care which cup hides the ball.

This whole thing reeks, and not just of methane and oil.

We are talking grade A high class treachery and intrigue.

I wouldn't even know where to begin.

Just let your mind go where it needs to, and we will find the truth eventually. It's inevitable.

Chaos is the only Order! The truth can never be hidden. Those who seek control Fail. This is a fact of the Universe who can deny it?

Legend says that when Alexander the Great died, he had his hands shown for all to see with outstretched arms. WHY? Because he wanted to show everyone WHAT he gets to take with him to the Afterlife. NOTHING.

We are gonna figure Matt Simmons and his incredible claims out soon enough.

ATS (the public) will get to the bottom of it. That's how things work around here after all.

So I am just gonna sit back and watch the show. All I can do now is cheer you folks on. Keep up the good work guys/gals!!

Oh yeah.

And keep focused.

Ask questions.

Then search for their answers. When you find an answer to your question, ask more questions.

Have no fear or doubts, because those whom hide things can not possibly cover every angle, because there are Infinite angles. The universe is mathematical at it's core foundations.

Any one thing can be viewed from infinite angles. Similar to the way one measurement of a meter can be further divided into infinite sub parts, and you can wade endlessly into the microcosm of nanometers and smaller.

Therefore since humans don't live forever, and our lives are terribly short, no one person or groups of people could possibly know how to hide every possible viewpoint of a particular point (a secret idea).

The idea will reveal itself to those whom look for a way. This is by default the nature of the Universe it is at it's core a mathematical principal. A being nor group of beings cannot hide a fact from those who seek to know it.

This is just a basic philosophy. I share it with you in hopes that you can find out the truth about the BP Oil spill. And share it with me one day. And with the world. I don't know who will read this.

Maybe someone deep in the system will? I would like to think so.

reply to post by Conluceo


If Matt Simmons says it, you can believe it to be true. Basically, nothing has been solved. The oil continues to flow.

Is this the Matt Simmons of this link?

www.simmonsco-intl.com...

Because if it is, I find it strange that a person making billions selling energy related enterprises has this to say about BP, which is looking for new investors, no?

I don't trust much BP, but wouldn't his intervention allow for a manipulation of the price the buyer will have to pay in the end? Undermining BP, ( if that is possible! ) might be what he's doing...

But I might be totally wrong. Can anyone confirm the association between the person named in the OP and the link I provided? Thanks in advance!

Originally posted by astrogolf
reply to post by Conluceo

 

If Matt Simmons says it, you can believe it to be true. Basically, nothing has been solved. The oil continues to flow.

And this is why it MUST be questioned.

It is the age old 'immovable object and unstoppable force' dilemma.

How can we believe anything from either side of this controversy ?

I can only question both sides, as I cannot believe either.

Let's see...Matt Simmons was a head bureaucrat for the Bush regime,
and he is telling us that his experience on analysing data about the deepwater well
and NASA pics of the GOM waters
which are interpeted as showing subsurface darkness of the gulf waters
indicate that an ammount equal to 120,000 bbls is continualy flowing into the Gulf.

Or - we have the BP hirlings stating that this event is not much more than the ammount of oil found at a Quickie-Lube station after a days work in changing oil & fluids on (say) 50 cars a day


just whom am i going to trust or believe more ???

Since when is matt williams an 'oil expert'?

And what does he base his statements on?

a magic eight ball?

I see alot of people have problems with Mr.Simons and what he says.You may have seen where he was getting info from NOAA. If that is right and he is getting info from NOAA he may be onto something. I have a hard time believing that someone that works for NOAA is not upset and wants to let it be known the truth about what is really going on. As far as what he is saying about the cap and leak is probably closer to the truth than anything BP has tried to feed us on this situation. I guess we will just have to wait and see what is and what isn't the real story about whats going on.

As long as Matt Simmons keeps spouting his mindless prattle I'll keep responding. Matt simmons is at best a banker and at worst a journalist. To date not one of hysterical claims have proven correct.

1) Pressure is 70,000 to 100,000 psi-physically impossible
2) There is no casing so the cap won't work.- Its working
3) Relief wells won't work because of casing- We control wells all the time without casing.

These are the biggest idiocy I'm sure there are others.

What does a leak 10 miles away have to do with the blow out, another physical impossibility.

Reality is that if they could close it in now why didn't they do this 3 months ago? That's a real question. All the BP engineers can't be morons. That's the real conspiracy that worries me. The blow out was an accident. Letting it create the disaster it has appears to not be an accident.

The thing about BP is that they have been caught lying from the beginning, I would rather trust Mr.Simmons to anything they have to say.

And why do they continue calling it a spill or anybody for that matter, when it's clearly a leak?

I really hope people can be saved from all of this before anyone realizes it's too late.

Can someone verify that NOAA has found another leak? This it what Simmons is saying. I find nothing he say's that isn't plausible so I'm not dismissing this just yet. Why would someone in his position go out on a limb with these accusations when it's the oil industry that has lined his pockets in the first place?
If a hurricane comes in, which is inevitable, it's going to get every ones attention all over again. Even if he is wrong about another leak it doesn't matter because the gulf is dead with the Methane levels alone.

Matt Simmons on Youtube

Seem's quite possible when you read this story from the "Washington Post"






www.washingtonpost.com...

So the plot thickens, we have a fake site were a test well was drilled and capped and much further away is the actuall site where the methane explosion tore a new asswhole in the ocean floor and no way to fix it.
the live ROV video feed is at the exploritory hole, thats the site there claiming is the problem, which they can fix and cap.

So durning this fudging they had two open oil well's pouring out 240,000 barrels a day approx, now there stuck at the original site screwing around trying to fill in a gap in the sea bed floor as 120,000 barrels are being burned off and dislodged by dispersent making a under water lake of crude and methane and slowly making it's way inward toward the coast.

The relief well there doing now will be a horzintal well across the gash which they will try and cement up as a tempoary measure and than take off and leave it to the american government, so there selling two concepts. and buying everyone else along the way.

Originally posted by Conluceo

The thing about BP is that they have been caught lying from the beginning, I would rather trust Mr.Simmons to anything they have to say.

is mats record any better?

And why do they continue calling it a spill or anybody for that matter, when it's clearly a leak?

Semantics? really??

It seems somewhat obvious to me most refer to it as a "spill" because that is the terminology we associate with 'lots of oil dumping about on teh natures'.

You claim 'leak' is more appropriate, but others will get as offended as you are and say it should be 'gusher'; that 'leak' downplays the severity.

are the semantics actually relevant?

I really dont think the terminology is being used to manipulate public perception, so it would seem its not really a mortal sin to call it a leak, or a trickle, or a gusher or a blowout. The amount of crude in the Gulf is well-publicized in the dreaded 'MSM' and no one thinks this is a little leaky faucet, of if they do, its not because of the media or terminology.

So, just call it a dohizzle and get over it!