It’s time for me to break down why I’m about 95% certain this whole “disaster” in the Gulf is an orchestrated illusion staged by
coconspirators BP, mass media and the federal government.
Up until a few weeks ago, I knew that this “disaster” was intentional, but I always assumed without a second thought that it was a huge
catastrophic oil gusher.
That began to change when I watched this youtube video of Kindra Arnesen, the BP Community Liaison who seemed to instantly appear out of nowhere and
take over the scene
www.youtube.com...
What did it was when she said at the end of the video: "I don't want to live in this country right now." I said to myself, “This woman is
encouraging her fellow citizens to leave America? … something aint right”.
In disgust I commented on the vid and about a day later someone emailed me on my youtube account and said they agreed with my observation and said
that I might want to check out a couple of videos on their channel, so I did.
The first video was titled: The Oil Spill Is A Illusion....Its All Setup
www.youtube.com...
This vid was a report about info that was submitted by an “anonymous online entity”. The information made a strong case that the oil spill was
actually an asphalt volcano tapped by BP to mimic an oil leak.
The other vids were a series of analysis done by the host of Antimatter Radio Jeffrey Grupp where he goes over the weak evidence provided through the
media to show that there really is a disaster:
THERE IS NO GULF CRISIS!! Part 1 & 2
www.youtube.com...
www.youtube.com...
Gulf Oil Buried Under 1 Foot of Beach Sand is a TOTAL HOAX
www.youtube.com...
THERE ANY OIL? Media won't show 1 picture of Mississippi oil on beaches!
www.youtube.com...
After watching those video reports I felt that the information provided deserves just as much consideration as what I’m getting from BP, MSM and the
federal government… After all, I know BP, MSM and the fed are a gang of criminals, but the sources that supplied the info in those vids were
unknown. So why not include them into my list of possibilities?
From then on I found a series of clues that led me to almost certainly believe that this whole thing is a staged illusion. I’ll start with the final
clue and work back.
Yesterday a forum member started a thread titled “Deepwater Disaster-The Trigger”
www.abovetopsecret.com...
He/she began the thread with an awful picture of supposed oiled beach from the Gulf and expressed a lot of concern. Then further down the post an
intelligent observer pointed out the following:
“There aren't any mountains along the Gulf Coast of Texas, Louisanna, Alabama, Missisippi. or Florida! That pic isn't from the Gulf states. Maybe
Alaska.”
Another poster asked for a link for the pic but none was provided. So I searched the pic source and I found that it came from Doug Suttles'
website:
www.dougsuttles.com...
Doug Suttles is BP Chief Operating Officer of BP Exploration and Production
en.wikipedia.org...
Why would a high ranking exec at BP be posting up phony pics of Gulf oil-soaked beaches that weren’t from the Gulf on their website? Isn’t BP
supposed to be trying to play down this “disaster”? If it’s so bad in the Gulf, surely they can find real pics of the area being the only ones
who have access.
Earlier I found these other clues:
The accidental slipup of the ROV 2 feed a poster saw showing a human diver 5,000 feet below near the well... humans in the best suits can't go much
more than 2,000 feet...
Recently one of the posters named speaknoevil07 posted a comment in the “Up to the Minute” discussion thread that the ROV 2 showed “a rigged up
diver” possibly when the camera was deep at the well site. His statement was as follows:
Original post by speaknoevil07
posted on 15-7-2010 @ 10:18 PM
”NOw Rov 2 is showing a diver going down, does anyone else see that.... before the camera was deep now it shows a rigged up person going down. Ok
in the time it took me to type.......after I saw the diver. the screen went black.”
What he’s saying here is that the ROV 2 camera "was deep" and then it showed “a rigged up diver”. Then in the time it took him to type...
suddenly the screen went black.
Looks to me like they may have had to turn that sucker off quick… don’t want anyone to see a human diver 5,000 ft down... which is impossible.
My reply to speaknoevil07 was as follows:
Soleprobe reply to post by speaknoevil07
posted on 16-7-2010 @ 12:27 AM
”When you say rigged up diver... do you mean a man in a deep diving suit?”
Only 5 minutes later DragonFire1024 responds on behalf of speaknoevil07 to clarify what “he probably saw”:
DragonFire1024 reply to post by soleprobe
posted on 16-7-2010 @ 12:32 AM
“He probably saw one of the ROVs on the boat after it came up out of the water. I believe it was one of the Viking ROVs”
Now doesn’t DragonFire1024 seem to jump in quickly, like only 5 minutes to clarify another poster?
He’s saying that it was “probably” one of the other ROVs , the “Viking ROVs”, “…on the boat after it came up out of the water.”
The problem with that explanation is that each ROV has its own camera, and the feed that speaknoevil07 was viewing was coming from ROV 2, not the
“Viking ROV” and ROV 2 was supposedly way down deep near the well. And guess what? All of a sudden some guy in a diving suit appears. Oops…
screen goes black.
Then my reply to DragonFire1024 who tried to speak for speaknoevil07 went as follows:
soleprobe reply to post by DragonFire1024
posted on 16-7-2010 @ 12:48 AM
”He said that the camera on the Rov 2 was deep and then it immediately showed "a rigged up person going down." If that's the case the ROV 2
was at a maximum of about 2,000 ft... humans can't dive much deeper than that.”
So to extrapolate from the above info… there may have been a human diver at the so-called site of the leak. But we know they told us that the leak
is about 5,000 ft below. This is way too deep for a human diver… Continued….
[edit on 20-7-2010 by soleprobe]