It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by HeinousOne
Alright, I will take back harsh words. They are tackling this issue head on.
Originally posted by St Udio
whats with the hype
they're been wild horses 'processed' from the N.C. coast and the American 'west' for decades now...
some are 'adopted' by qualified requesters, others are put-to-sleep
ATS didn't discover or uncover diddle...
about every 5-7 years the MSM does a show...about the situation,
of wild horses on government lands...& how humanely the situation is addressed...
I think you strutting like court-clowns, with all the feathers your putting in the 'above' bonnet....shame on the display....
?What- you all think that there is/was no history here, ATS is/are latecommers trying to inflate iots' value to the larger community :
dn:
Originally posted by DaMod
Well that was disappointing. I was hoping for more information to make it to the main stream. It put awareness out there but there are some really important points that where mentioned in the ATS interview that weren't even touched.
Originally posted by Maxmars
I "stayed for the show" afterward and was treated to enough material to understand this CNN anchor's 'formula' for news. I will not likely revisit the show....
Originally posted by MemoryShock
Originally posted by Maxmars
I "stayed for the show" afterward and was treated to enough material to understand this CNN anchor's 'formula' for news. I will not likely revisit the show....
Agreed...no offense to her...my biggest complaint?
Too much emphasis on the wild life heart strings and not enough focus on corporate influence upon our government practice...
That's the story...
Edit for spelling.
[edit on Tue, 13 Jul 2010 19:16:32 -0500 by MemoryShock]
Originally posted by tristar
Very well said, then again, if it was mentioned otherwise then some cell phone's would have rang that one would not want to answer.