It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by zabby
reply to post by wavemaker
I thought that was real for so long buttttt
the guy who made it came out and said it was a hoax ages ago haha
Originally posted by zabby
reply to post by wavemaker
Yeah he did haha
and there are a few little things people have pointed out on the video that show its fake, don't ask me about it, I wish it was real but yeah
Originally posted by jpvskyfreak
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/cff29d8dd687.jpg[/atsimg]
Taken from the cockpit of a cessna 172 German pilot doing private flying near Big Bear Mountain in the USA.
Originally posted by pjslug
Originally posted by jpvskyfreak
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/cff29d8dd687.jpg[/atsimg]
Taken from the cockpit of a cessna 172 German pilot doing private flying near Big Bear Mountain in the USA.
I delcare that photo a fake. Every object in the photo, be it mountains or clouds at different ranges is in focus. Why then is the UFO blurry?
Originally posted by OldDragger
This board, the entire internet is FULL OF hoax, fake, fraudulant UFO junk.
ATS is full of UFO hoaxes too.
Can any of you show ONE thing that isn't? That actually is evidence, even hinting of proof?
Seems a little odd that after all these years, all this "study' there is zilch, doesn't it.
AND! NOTICE I said proof, not "unexplained", as in, this photo is unexplained. Unexplained is only proof of it being unexplained!
Not unconfirmable "eyewitness" accounts.
You want to know why UFOlogy isn't a science? Because there isn't anything to study.
EVERY one of you that "believes' does so on faith, not reason or science.
So, I challenge you! Steer me to just ONE, just ONE bit of proof!
Originally posted by sapien82
reply to post by OldDragger
why then are eyewtinesses in high crown court cases to be believed , for any other case , yet UFO cases eyewitnesses are deemed crack pots ?
simply because the subject matter pertains to the wild and fanciful
look at those thousands of eyewitnesses across the world , are they not to be believed as evidence of visitation ?