It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
BECK: We have re-written history, and we are only looking now for the truth that helps our side. It must stop.
Originally posted by seagull
Why shouldn't the film, if there is one, of Sen. Byrd filibustering of the Civil Rights Act be public? I seem to recall having seen footage of debate in old newsreel film...no reason to believe there might not be something somewhere...
Because maybe it might cast an unappealing light upon an unappealing person? Like the late Sen. Ted Kennedy, and many others, both Rep. and Dem.; Sen. Byrd had his skeletons...his KKK history being a fairly large one.
I, for one, would like to see this film, if it exists... Not to score points, the man is dead, and beyond our petty ideologies. More for an insight into the man...
...conscience of the Senate? Hm mm...maybe not so much.
Originally posted by ProjectJimmy
This is, for most people, a gut emotional response, not a rational one, and trusting the gut, so to speak, over rational thinking is incredibly dangerous for voters to do.
Originally posted by dizzie56
Originally posted by ProjectJimmy
This is, for most people, a gut emotional response, not a rational one, and trusting the gut, so to speak, over rational thinking is incredibly dangerous for voters to do.
Wouldnt a rational response also be somebody, say the op, coming on here and recussing the fact that he only took a snipit from a source and didnt include the fact that cameras HAVE been on the senate floor from at least the '40s for major events? Or is a rational response like yours in only casting doubt on Beck no matter what?
Originally posted by dizzie56
Wouldnt a rational response also be somebody, say the op, coming on here and recussing the fact that he only took a snipit from a source and didnt include the fact that cameras HAVE been on the senate floor from at least the '40s for major events? Or is a rational response like yours in only casting doubt on Beck no matter what?