Objects Near Sun - What Are They?

STEREO (Behind) watched over a 48-hour period (April 23-25, 2010) as a substantial coronal hole (the much darker area) rotated towards solar center, while three small coronal mass ejections erupted from active regions near it

Was Just watching this video and noticed a V shape occur, which to me looks like two objects/bodies moving close to each other. I'm curious to find out if these are planets?



Screen Shot

stereo.gsfc.nasa.gov...

I managed to move the scroll bar on Quicktime in stages and ended up seeing this.


[edit on 7-7-2010 by hornum]

Your linking needs fixing. It's all screwed up.

I just watched the source files for this movie (pretty cool, by the way) and cannot reproduce what you're seeing.

I want to chop it up to poor-quality video static. Either that, or a hoax.

Prove me wrong, please?

Quick edit: I can't seem to replicate that exact moment in the provided source material, either. I'm judging the exact moment by the look of the sun and yet can't find that exact replica. I wonder...

Quick edit #2: After further analysis, I'm beginning to think NASA may have cut that specific portion from the videos they host. The videos seem to start *right after* or ends *right before* that position. Confirm?

[edit on 7-7-2010 by The Theorist]

I am going to assume that ship is there to collect the power supply spheres that are on the suns surface.

I cannot be sure though. I am at work, so I cannot get to any of the pics of the spheres to which I refer, but I am quite sure that some of our fellow ATS brethren can lend a hand.

reply to post by daddymax


The image he provided isn't linking properly. However, I raise a question.

The official NASA videos seem to end right before or begin right after the reference in the picture. I think NASA may be covering something up, suddenly.

View the provided movies at the source link and match it up to the image taken. The scene in the picture and the scenes in the provided videos DO NOT match. Almost like something was cut.

reply to post by The Theorist


I just took a screen capture of that frame from the imbeded player on the site.
Try matching up the control surface on your player as I can't give you a time to go to.


[edit on 7-7-2010 by hornum]

reply to post by hornum


I did. I even framed-by-framed. That exact moment is no longer in the videos. Come to the chat.

The image you posted does not match the video, the surface of the Sun looks completely different.
Here is that video:
stereo.gsfc.nasa.gov...

In any case, planets do not appear in the full disk images because the Sun is too bright for them to show.

What you are seeing is the result of cosmic rays striking the sensor. You can see many examples in the video above.

Cosmic rays are very high energy particles which come from a variety of sources (e.g. solar flares, supernovae). They are of interest to lots of astronomers, but mostly just noise for us. We see lots of them in every image and occasionally, 3 or 4 of them hit the CCD in just the right places in consecutive images to fool us into believing there is a real object there. The cosmic rays can show up as points or as streaks. (helios.gsfc.nasa.gov...). Click on the image below to see typical examples of cosmic rays visible in LASCO images.

sungrazer.nrl.navy.mil...

stereo.gsfc.nasa.gov...



[edit on 7/7/2010 by Phage]

An enhanced image by our friendly Baked:

img704.imageshack.us...

Originally posted by Phage
The image you posted does not match the video, the surface of the Sun looks completely different.
Here is that video:
stereo.gsfc.nasa.gov...

In any case, planets do not appear in the full disk images because the Sun is too bright for them to show.

What you are seeing is the result of cosmic rays striking the sensor. You can see many examples in the video above.

Cosmic rays are very high energy particles which come from a variety of sources (e.g. solar flares, supernovae). They are of interest to lots of astronomers, but mostly just noise for us. We see lots of them in every image and occasionally, 3 or 4 of them hit the CCD in just the right places in consecutive images to fool us into believing there is a real object there. The cosmic rays can show up as points or as streaks. (helios.gsfc.nasa.gov...). Click on the image below to see typical examples of cosmic rays visible in LASCO images.

sungrazer.nrl.navy.mil...

stereo.gsfc.nasa.gov...



[edit on 7/7/2010 by Phage]

Interesting, Thanks. Just out of a matter of interest, how many frames are there within the 48Hr capture? Would you know?




[edit on 7-7-2010 by hornum]

[edit on 7-7-2010 by hornum]

reply to post by Phage


Wouldnt happen to know how many frames there would be in 48Hr footage?

reply to post by Phage


I don't think this is the result of cosmic rays striking the sensor.

Correct link to video stereo.gsfc.nasa.gov...


[edit on 7-7-2010 by hornum]

reply to post by hornum

I do think so.

The animation you linked is the same one I did and it does not match the image you posted. The activity on the surface in the video is completely different from that in the image.

They are the ones who will reserect jesus, and awaken the sun.


bible guys

I believe the objects by the sun are Very hot objects.

I think they are so hot that we see them glow.

reply to post by RUFFREADY


how else do you awaken the sun? MICROWAVEEEEE

I agree with Phage on this one. None of the links provided match the surface detail shown in the screenshot. The date given matches the date of the videos, though.
The most prominent feature of the STEREO images from the links is a "square" dark area. This is completely missing on the screen shot; the screen shot shows much more "bright" areas than the links.
In addition to that, it really just is a matter of "cherry-picking". There are lines evident all over the linked video. Some on the right, some on the left, close to the sun, farther out, some short, some long. The site explains such things as cosmic rays. As they are the people who built, operate and study the entire program, the professionals and experts, I'll go with them.
If you think it is something different, prove it. Supply something concrete, with provenance and credentials.

When i was a nipper i remember reading of the planet Vulcan in an old encyclopedia. Modern astronomy books tend to totally miss its' supposed presence out as Mercury's perturbation in it's orbit were later explained by a more modern mathematical model.

Be that as it may, this article on wiki gives you the details and a reported sighting by an astronomer of an object within Mercury's orbit around the Sun.

In December 1859, Le Verrier received a letter from a French physician and amateur astronomer called Edmond Modeste Lescarbault, who claimed to have seen a transit of the hypothetical planet earlier in the year. Le Verrier took the train to the village of Orgères-en-Beauce, some 70 kilometres southwest of Paris, where Lescarbault had built himself a small observatory. Le Verrier arrived unannounced and proceeded to interrogate the man. Lescarbault described in detail how, on 26 March 1859, he noticed a small black dot on the face of the Sun, which he was studying with his modest 3.75 inches (95 mm) refractor. Thinking it to be a sunspot, Lescarbault was not at first surprised, but after some time had passed he realized that it was moving. Having observed the transit of Mercury in 1845, he guessed that what he was observing was another transit, but of a previously undiscovered body. He took some hasty measurements of its position and direction of motion, and using an old clock and a pendulum with which he took his patients’ pulses, he estimated the duration of the transit at 1 hour, 17 minutes and 9 seconds. Le Verrier thought he was satisfied that Lescarbault had seen the transit of a previously unknown planet. On 2 January 1860 he announced the discovery of Vulcan to a meeting of the Académie des Sciences in Paris. Lescarbault, for his part, was awarded the Légion d'honneur and invited to appear before numerous learned societies.

en.wikipedia.org...(hypothetical_planet)
The full article can be found here ...

that's the first i've heard....thanks...what that means is that someone doesn't want us to know...hmmm, yeszzz sounds about right,
star trek knew about vulcan....

reply to post by Phage



Here is the correct video. Sorry stereo.gsfc.nasa.gov...

reply to post by hornum

Here's the high resolution version of that frame.
stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov...

The one 2 minutes before:
stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov...

And the one 3 minutes after:
stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov...

They are cosmic ray strikes.