It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by DISRAELI
reply to post by Trudge
It could be like the difference between the characters in a book and the person reading the book.
If you read a history book, or a novel that you've read before, you can know exactly what's going to happen. You know that Captain Ahab is not going to get that whale. You know King Charles is going to get his head chopped off. That could be God's knowledge. He's got the whole book in front of him
We're in the position of the characters in the book. We can only see the events as they happen.
Originally posted by Tanulis
But if God knows what will happen in the infinite future, either:
A: He is powerless, since all he is at this point is a spectator. He cant change what he already knows will happen. Additionally, willpower doesn't truly exist for us mortals since our plans have been laid before us already.
or
B: God created a large amount of us humans intentionally to live their lives as a different religion just so he could send us to hell for not worshiping him. Since he knows what choices we will make through our lifetime.
Originally posted by SentientBeyondDesign
Knowing the future would involve knowing all possible configurations. Now, just because you know everything that could happen, doesn't mean you know precisely what will happen.
Meaning, the best you can do, up until the actual moment of "happening" is to narrow down the range of possibilities to the smallest possible figure. You want to make it as acute as possible.
But, until the event actually unfolds, you won't have a definitive answer.
It is like ... knowing all the possible outcomes of where the baseball you hit is going to land. You may know every single configuration, yes, but can you zero in on one? Not really, because the variables constituting that future up until becoming actual can change at any given moment.
At least ... that is what it seems like to me.
Originally posted by DISRAELI
reply to post by Trudge
My metaphors come from book-reading.
Your metaphors come from web-surfing.
Does that define me as the one who's living in the past?
Originally posted by adjensen
The best explanation that I've seen is a practical one.
Get a piece of paper. Draw a straight line on the paper. This line represents time -- one end is the beginning of time, the other is the end. Or maybe one end is your birth, the other your death.
Time is the line, God is the paper.
Originally posted by SentientBeyondDesign
reply to post by Trudge
Seems more like reincarnation, to me. And I don't see anything wrong with believing that, really. It could be true. My only issue with that is that, imo, it would help if we were born with a list of things to work on, really.
Not some abstract sorta, "find your path" kind of thing. But like, "Okay, you did all this well, but now you need to work on these things."
But then again, maybe that would also us to know what we did wrong, and knowing what we did wrong might trap us within obsession of that wrong doing. It might make us live every waking moment in regret and guilt.
But ... then again, a lot of us already do that now.
Originally posted by Trudge
Originally posted by adjensen
The best explanation that I've seen is a practical one.
Get a piece of paper. Draw a straight line on the paper. This line represents time -- one end is the beginning of time, the other is the end. Or maybe one end is your birth, the other your death.
Time is the line, God is the paper.
What if you connect the "beginning" and "end" of the line to form a circle?
Originally posted by adjensen
Originally posted by Trudge
Originally posted by adjensen
The best explanation that I've seen is a practical one.
Get a piece of paper. Draw a straight line on the paper. This line represents time -- one end is the beginning of time, the other is the end. Or maybe one end is your birth, the other your death.
Time is the line, God is the paper.
What if you connect the "beginning" and "end" of the line to form a circle?
For purposes of the explanation, I don't see that makes anything of a difference. Each fragment of the line, regardless of how it's drawn, exists separate from the other fragments, but the relationship of the paper and all fragments is the same.
Originally posted by Trudge
Originally posted by adjensen
Originally posted by Trudge
Originally posted by adjensen
The best explanation that I've seen is a practical one.
Get a piece of paper. Draw a straight line on the paper. This line represents time -- one end is the beginning of time, the other is the end. Or maybe one end is your birth, the other your death.
Time is the line, God is the paper.
What if you connect the "beginning" and "end" of the line to form a circle?
For purposes of the explanation, I don't see that makes anything of a difference. Each fragment of the line, regardless of how it's drawn, exists separate from the other fragments, but the relationship of the paper and all fragments is the same.
Well a circle would represent everlasting, or any shape for that matter that is connected to each other that has no beginning or end, and that "god" is the circle and we make up the "fragments" inside the circle (your explanation is the same thing I am saying, just a different way of looking at it. Rather than a piece of paper, there is no paper just a shape with no beginning or end with "us" being part of it).
Originally posted by Trudge
reply to post by adjensen
But if God is eveything, isn't he time as well?