It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by muzzleflash
The reporter claims that the MoD's reasoning for not investigating the incident was basically that "there is no evidence that there is a credible threat".
Originally posted by 12voltz
reply to post by muzzleflash
Not trying to be insulting ,i just looked at the pic and that was my thoughts,you said yourself that you call out other sightings 95% of time.Dont be offended it was my observation from the one pic
Originally posted by randomname
reply to post by muzzleflash
if you're grown ups why to you vote for people to care of you and rule you.
a man takes care of himself, his family and solves all his problems himself.
Originally posted by redblue
That does not look like a UFO. Looks more like a camera artifact (dust, smudge).
Nothing to investigate.
Originally posted by randomname
reply to post by muzzleflash
if you're grown ups why to you vote for people to care of you and rule you.
a man takes care of himself, his family and solves all his problems himself.
Originally posted by FireMoon
To the best of my knowledge the guy took the photos because he could see the UFO with his eyes, not.. the UFO showed up after the photos were developed. So that's a bit of fail to suggest it's a smudge isn't it?