It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It requires temperatures of at least 5,000 fahrenheit to melt steel. Diesel jet fuel does not reach these temperatures and the fires in the buildings were short lived. Firefighter tape recordings prove that only small pockets of fire were still burning in the buildings seconds before their collapse.
The USGS Spectroscopy Lab produced images which showed dense thermal hot spots days and weeks after the attacks. ABC News reported that, "the temperature at the core of "the pile," is near 2000 degrees Fahrenheit, according to fire officials, who add that the fires are too deep for firefighters to get to."
In perfect conditions the maximum temperature that can be reached by hydrocarbons such as jet fuel burning in air is 1520° F (825° C). When the World Trade Center collapsed the deeply buried fires would have been deprived of oxygen and their temperatures would have significantly decreased.
Why was the temperature at the core of "the pile" nearly 500° F hotter than the maximum burning temperature of jet fuel a full seven days after the collapses? There were no infernos in either of the twin towers before they collapsed, so what caused the hot spots deep in their wreckage?
Dr. Frank Gayle , Metals Expert, on the jet fuel fires which burned in the WTC buildings:
"Your gut reaction would be the jet fuel is what made the fire so very intense, a lot of people figured that's what melted the steel. Indeed it didn't, the steel did not melt."
Molten steel did not exist in the WTC buildings prior to the collapses, but...
Molten steel was found �three, four, and five weeks later, when the rubble was being removed [from WTCs 1 & 2],� Mark Loizeaux, president of Controlled Demolition, Inc. (CDI) of Phoenix, Maryland is on record as saying . He said molten steel was also found at 7 WTC, which collapsed mysteriously in the late afternoon.
One of the more unusual artifacts to emerge from the rubble was a rock-like object which has come to be known as "the meteorite". It is a fused element of molten steel and concrete all fused by the heat into one single element.
One of the more unusual artifacts to emerge from the rubble was a rock-like object which has come to be known as "the meteorite". It is a fused element of molten steel and concrete all fused by the heat into one single element.
The unexplained presence of molten metal at the World Trade Center (WTC) puzzled Jones and he contacted this writer to confirm the reports first published in American Free Press in 2002. These reports came from two men involved in the removal of the rubble: Peter Tully of Tully Construction of Flushing, N.Y., and Mark Loizeaux of Controlled Demolition, Inc. of Phoenix, Md.
Tully told AFP that he had seen pools of �literally molten
steel� in the rubble.
Loizeaux confirmed this: �Yes, hot spots of molten steel in the basements,� he said, �at the bottom of the elevator shafts of the main towers, down seven levels.�
The observation of molten metal at Ground Zero was emphasized publicly by Leslie Robertson, the structural engineer responsible for the design of the World Trade Center Towers, who reported that "As of 21 days after the attack, the fires were still burning and molten steel was still running." (Williams, 2001, p. 3.)
Dr. Keith Eaton toured Ground Zero and stated in The Structural Engineer , "They showed us many fascinating slides [Eaton] continued, ranging from molten metal which was still red hot weeks after the event, to 4-inch thick steel plates sheared and bent in the disaster." (Structural Engineer , September 3, 2002, p. 6;.
Originally posted by Alfie1
reply to post by jprophet420
When you say "meteorite" I hope you are not referring to that item with obviously unmelted reinforcing iron bar in it. Have you got a pic ?
Mark Loizeaux has made it clear he never personally ever saw molten steel at the WTC site :-
www.911myths.com...
Originally posted by KillenfizzenHumboflorator
reply to post by Alfie1
Just because ONE person, no matter what reputation he has, says that HE personally saw not traces of molten metal does not mean that it was not present......
Originally posted by Alfie1
reply to post by jprophet420
Please show me pics of molten steel at the WTC site.
The " meteorite " not only has unmelted iron bar in it but legibly printed paper matter !
Originally posted by KillenfizzenHumboflorator
reply to post by Alfie1
Absolutely, therma(i)te has a very distinct scent. I know what explosives smell like from being in the army due to frequent FTX missions that involved explosives.
Thermate has a sulfuric scent with a very heavy muskiness that smells like nothing else out there and after one has been exposed to it just once, the smell sticks with you. So, when one smells it at a site of a supposed terrorist attack, one can only conclude that explosives are present........even though the official NIST report states that no explosives were used.....
That is an insult to all of those who smelled thermate on that day.
Originally posted by jprophet420
Originally posted by Alfie1
reply to post by jprophet420
Please show me pics of molten steel at the WTC site.
The " meteorite " not only has unmelted iron bar in it but legibly printed paper matter !
As I said they are linked.
Originally posted by Alfie1
Originally posted by KillenfizzenHumboflorator
reply to post by Alfie1
Just because ONE person, no matter what reputation he has, says that HE personally saw not traces of molten metal does not mean that it was not present......
The point is that Mark Loizeaux was put forward as a witness and he isn't.
Originally posted by Alfie1
Originally posted by jprophet420
Originally posted by Alfie1
reply to post by jprophet420
Please show me pics of molten steel at the WTC site.
The " meteorite " not only has unmelted iron bar in it but legibly printed paper matter !
As I said they are linked.
Sorry, I don't understand your reply.