It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by hornum
The point is there are often logical answers for things...
Originally posted by Malcram
Originally posted by hornum
The point is there are often logical answers for things...
Sometimes the 'logical' conclusion is that it is more likely ET than man made. If something displays abilities infinitely more advanced than any known or theoretical human design then sometimes it becomes more logical to think it was ET, because to accept it as man-made stretches credulity to breaking point.
With the man-made idea you are often left with a huge tangle of consequent problems which are very hard to account for. How could we hide this home-grown technology on a relatively small planet? Who is hiding it? Where? How can it be so much more advanced than anything else humans are known to have? How is possible to have two different technological infrastructures (virtually two civilizations) - one being perhaps as advanced from us as we are from the Romans - sharing the same space and yet one of them remaining completely invisible and unknown to the other? Etc.
Now, to accept that TPTB may be hiding some examples of recovered ET tech is one thing, but to account for them secretly creating it all themselves on earth is quite another.
You don't have those particular problems with the ETH. Statistically, the vastness of the universe must be teeming with life. Some of it must be incredibly advanced.
It visited.
Simple. Logical. Neat. Entirely possible.
[edit on 19-6-2010 by Malcram]
Originally posted by Leonardo01
I concur with you to a certain extent.But then again even the E.T equation that you pose has some problems.
1)If this E.T race is so advanced then what prevents it from making contact if its motives were altrusitic in nature and what prevents it from destroying, subjugating or conquering us?
I understand that having a secret base on land would be difficult but then most of our oceans lie unexplored so it really isn't all that difficult.We also keep hearing stories of strange hums and sounds ...
Originally posted by Malcram
Originally posted by hornum
The point is there are often logical answers for things...
Sometimes the 'logical' conclusion is that it is more likely ET than man made. If something displays abilities infinitely more advanced than any known or theoretical human design then sometimes it becomes more logical to think it was ET, because to accept it as man-made stretches credulity to breaking point.
I accept your idea, do you have some examples? "to accept it as man-made stretches credulity to breaking point". I really don't undertand why you think that man is not capable of these things.Just looking at the US Military for instance it is logical to believe that there are aircraft capable 0f mach 10+ now. I use the SR71 as an example.
With the man-made idea you are often left with a huge tangle of consequent problems which are very hard to account for. How could we hide this home-grown technology on a relatively small planet?
Actually this would be quite easy, the ocean.
Who is hiding it?
I have explained this.
Where? How can it be so much more advanced than anything else humans are known to have?
And this.
How is possible to have two different technological infrastructures (virtually two civilizations) - one being perhaps as advanced from us as we are from the Romans - sharing the same space and yet one of them remaining completely invisible and unknown to the other? Etc.
Easier than you seem to think. The ocean, subterainian.
Now, to accept that TPTB may be hiding some examples of recovered ET tech is one thing, but to account for them secretly creating it all themselves on earth is quite another.
Well that is exactly what I am saying, all of this technology is man made.
You don't have those particular problems with the ETH. Statistically, the vastness of the universe must be teeming with life. Some of it must be incredibly advanced.
Statistically?
Do you accept that statistics can be wrong.
It visited.
Simple. Logical. Neat. Entirely possible.
My thinking is possible, it is just that you chose to believe what you do because in my opinion you need something to hold onto, something to give you hope. Dreams of meeting aliens of their tech. You should really be keeping that hope reserved for mankind.
[edit on 19-6-2010 by Malcram]
one recent example: phoenix lights incident...this was seen by thousands of people, over distances of hundreds of miles between phoenix and tucson, arizona. this was not a mass con job, or a single tin-hatter nut case.
Originally posted by hornum
I accept your idea, do you have some examples? "to accept it as man-made stretches credulity to breaking point". I really don't undertand why you think that man is not capable of these things.
Actually this would be quite easy, the ocean.
Statistically? Do you accept that statistics can be wrong.
My thinking is possible
Just that you chose to believe what you do because in my opinion you need something to hold onto, something to give you hope. Dreams of meeting aliens of their tech
Originally posted by hornum
Yes I am familiar with buzz's Apollo 11 comments but Buzz himself has confirmed that what he saw was not Unidentified and that it was four detached spacecraft adapter panels.
Originally posted by hornum
It's interesting how I have not had one UFO/USO witness yet! Just a bunch of video's from the 90's!
[edit on 19-6-2010 by hornum]
Originally posted by hornum
So I am interested in hearing people's opinions on why they are convinced that they were ET's.
Is it popular culture that has created this thinking? I think so.
Originally posted by Malcram
Originally posted by hornum
I accept your idea, do you have some examples? "to accept it as man-made stretches credulity to breaking point". I really don't undertand why you think that man is not capable of these things.
Well, I was talking about sightings where the nature of what was observed renders it virtually impossible that the object is man made. Yes, there are sightings of craft which could feasibly be man made. But there are also some where it is not feasible. There only needs to be one such case and we have to conclude that ET's are responsible for some UFO's. In fact there are many such cases.
Can you please give me a case. You yourself say that it is “virtually impossible” I would like an example, just one.
Actually this would be quite easy, the ocean.
Hang on, you can't just say "the ocean" and imagine that this answers all of those questions I raised above. It doesn't come close and leaves countless unanswered questions and almost insurmountable problems. I'm not saying it's impossible, just monumentally unlikely.
Please list your questions and I will answer them.
Statistically? Do you accept that statistics can be wrong.
No, that statistics are correct. But if you mean does the statistical likelihood prove that something has occurred, then no, it just shows it to be very likely.
I’m going to leave this one alone. I accept your standing which means it is possible they are of mankind.
My thinking is possible
Of course, as is mine. I was discussing sightings in which only one is possible or likely. There are sightings of intelligently controlled UFO's in which the man-made explanation is likely and others where it is truly absurd. There only needs to be one such in which we are forced to conclude it is ET and them your theory is overturned.
I ask again for an example where we are forced to conclude it is ET.
Just that you chose to believe what you do because in my opinion you need something to hold onto, something to give you hope. Dreams of meeting aliens of their tech
Well, that's pure invention on your part and has noting to do with our discussion. You don't know me or my beliefs. Let's stay away from attempting to proclaim on each others imagined motivations.
No problem.
Thank you
[edit on 19-6-2010 by Malcram]
Originally posted by Jonas86
Originally posted by hornum
Yes I am familiar with buzz's Apollo 11 comments but Buzz himself has confirmed that what he saw was not Unidentified and that it was four detached spacecraft adapter panels.
Really? It's always sad when some of the most important "evidence" is swept under the carpet.. So his statements were taken out of context, making it seem as if he's talking about alien spacecraft..
[edit on 19-6-2010 by Jonas86]
Originally posted by Kojiro
Originally posted by hornum
It's interesting how I have not had one UFO/USO witness yet! Just a bunch of video's from the 90's!
[edit on 19-6-2010 by hornum]
So you've identified my probe, sir?
Originally posted by FOXMULDER147
Originally posted by hornum
So I am interested in hearing people's opinions on why they are convinced that they were ET's.
Is it popular culture that has created this thinking? I think so.
Do you incude the Sumerians, Egyptians, and Mayans as "popular culture"?
Originally posted by hornum
Originally posted by FOXMULDER147
Originally posted by hornum
So I am interested in hearing people's opinions on why they are convinced that they were ET's.
Is it popular culture that has created this thinking? I think so.
Do you incude the Sumerians, Egyptians, and Mayans as "popular culture"?
Many cultures have stories of Gods and the like coming from the stars.
And why do you think that might be?
I mean, we - modern humans - don't think that, so why would the ancient cultures think that?
And why is believing that Gods or other beings came from the stars any less valid than modern humans believing "God" made the world in seven days, 6000 years ago...?
If you ask me, the beliefs and religions of ancient cultures make more sense than the religions of today.
Originally posted by hornum
Actually modern humans do think that, and you are one of them.
Originally posted by hornum
Man has struggled with trying to understand it's existance for a longtime so this is nothing new. The purpose of this post was to envite people who have had first hand encounters. I am interested in what motivates them to assume they are ET. I will not get into Religion.
Originally posted by hornum
The purpose of this post was to envite people who have had first hand encounters. I am interested in what motivates them to assume they are ET.
Originally posted by Malcram
Originally posted by hornum
The purpose of this post was to envite people who have had first hand encounters. I am interested in what motivates them to assume they are ET.
I have seen something very strange that I can't explain and which I don't feel has a reasonable 'man-made' explanation (unless men are secretly building and piloting huge plasma craft).
To cut it very short, I saw three huge balls of orange 'light' (house sized at the very least) travel over my head, low, completely silently, well below thick cloud cover, their light reflecting on the clouds above.
They weren't lights on something, the something was all light. I could see that clearly. They were traveling horizontally, very fast. One passed over head, then a second or two later another two, traveling together, but staggered slightly, flew over.
The usual 'natural' explanations for balls of light simply don't cut it here.
I don't know what it was. I suspect it was ET but of an order very different to what we usually imagine.
[edit on 19-6-2010 by Malcram]