It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by autowrench
That may or may not be the case. Depends on the language of the contract, really. I would like to read the contracts, I could make a fair assumption then. I see a lot of problems, especially for those trying to file claims. Big Oil and the Rich Elite did not get that way by handing out billions of dollars to Joe Sixpack and Sally Housewife. Personally, I think the Obama White House should be the attorney of record for the fishermen and business owners seeking repatriations. Did you hear the CEO in that very expensive commercial?
"We will honor every legitimate claim." "Legitimate" could be whatever BP wants it to be, in reality.
Originally posted by OurskiesRpoisoned
And...the refs are ultimately responsible. They are fined, and fired and maybe even jailed.
MMS was the ref here.
Originally posted by AllexxisF1
Originally posted by OurskiesRpoisoned
And...the refs are ultimately responsible. They are fined, and fired and maybe even jailed.
MMS was the ref here.
Uh...the referees are not ultimately responsible. They are complicit but they are not the one's who perpetrated the crime.
The crime ultimately lays in the lap of those who payed off the referee and then proceeded to skirt existing laws to save money.
In your theory the cop getting payed off by the Mob is the one doing hard time and the Mob gets off completely.
Which of course is absolute lunacy.
[edit on 16-6-2010 by AllexxisF1]
Originally posted by OurskiesRpoisoned
The ref accepted the bribe. It was a choice.
Originally posted by AllexxisF1
Originally posted by OurskiesRpoisoned
The ref accepted the bribe. It was a choice.
The company who decided to break the law to save money by bribing a referee is not making a conscious choice?
Dude.
Seriously.
But one of the most talked-about discoveries in the Lower Tertiary was made not in the deep ocean, but in 20 feet of water, just 10 miles offshore.
After re-entering an abandoned wellbore, McMoran Exploration started the year with a gas discovery on its Davy Jones prospect. ...
Although the shallower, conventional horizons of the GOM Shelf have been heavily produced, only a small percentage of the wells have been drilled more than 15,000 feet below the mud line.
Davy Jones reached down almost twice that far and found a reservoir that is believed to hold at least 1 trillion cf of gas. ...
Ultra-deep sub-salt formations in the shallow-water GOM have been a primary drilling target for McMoran, which has identified 16 other promising prospects there.
Since the discovery, the New Orleans-based independent has drilled Davy Jones down to a total depth of 29,122 feet, where temperatures exceed 440°F and pressure is around 27,000 pounds per square inch.
The company is formulating plans for a flow test of the well in late 2010 or early next year – an industry first at that extreme combined temperature and pressure range.
At least 15 other commercially viable discoveries had been
made in the Lower Tertiary trend when BP announced Tiber in September 2009.
But what distinguishes Tiber is its size; with oil reserves estimated at 4bn-6bn barrels, it is even bigger than another BP-operated Lower Tertiary mega-discovery,
Kaskida, which is believed to hold around 3bn barrels of oil.
Drilled, ironically, by the Deepwater Horizon to a total depth of 35,055 feet, Tiber was the deepest well in the world at the time.
Originally posted by OurskiesRpoisoned
If MMS had done their job, there would be no oil disaster. Period. The marine life of the Gulf is under the responsibility of the MMS.
Originally posted by St Udio
the responsibility is on the decision to drill=where & how far
then to apply for a permit that outlines the protocols & procedures
if any of the execution of the venture went outside the permit or accepted practices then the execs bossing the drilling operations & personnel are responsible. not the MMS, not any Unions, nor any permit inspectors are responsible for the day-to-day operations. its all BP or that particular subsidairy (imho)
A million-to-one fluke of nature is not beyond a defense
Originally posted by OurskiesRpoisoned
Originally posted by St Udio
It's the MMS's responsibility to enforce the conditions of the permit.
That's why they exist.
Originally posted by St Udio
Originally posted by OurskiesRpoisoned
Originally posted by St Udio
It's the MMS's responsibility to enforce the conditions of the permit.
That's why they exist.
that sounds like Gestapo or SS authority... to constantly patrol & supervise
private businesses?
so, in you mind a building inspector/ Permit officer is at fault if someone gets hurt on the job, as the house is being built?
the builder/contractor/crew leader is not guilty or responsible?