It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by bismos
Originally posted by Valorian
reply to post by hornum
That is bullcrap...there is no toxicity as the oil is natural product, it ONLY gets bad when it reaches land or is refined for our use.
en.wikipedia.org...
check out what toxicity means. just because something is natural doesnt mean it isnt toxic. go eat a few pokeweed berries and let me know how ya feel afterwards.
Originally posted by Ahmose
yeah,
a blog isn't really going to cut it for most people here.
Originally posted by hornum
there is strong evidence that the oil spill was started deliberately in order to implement martial law and find an excuse to put people in FEMA prison camps as part of a Bilderberg agenda to take of the USA.
Originally posted by virgom129
reply to post by Divinorumus
Yeah and when the spill reaches the Canadian coast, just remember Australia has many Submarines and HUGE Sharks
Originally posted by InfaRedMan
Originally posted by hornum
there is strong evidence that the oil spill was started deliberately in order to implement martial law and find an excuse to put people in FEMA prison camps as part of a Bilderberg agenda to take of the USA.
Show me this strong evidence that what you say is true... and I mean strong!
IMHO, it just sounds like low brow, paranoid, chicken little fear mongering at it's lowest. You appear to have rejected reality and replaced it with your own.
Total BS! All of it!
IRM :shk:
Originally posted by A Novel
I'm willing to bet my life this will not happen. Anyone who believes this is not right in the head. Just another fema camp thread. One of about a million that show up here every year. Just stupid.
Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com
Originally posted by A Novel
Reply to post by hornum
You just sited one of the worst possible sources you can find. Canadafreepress writes whatever they want whenever they want. It's never correct.
Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com
How can crude oil affect my health?
Exposure to crude oil may irritate the eyes, skin, and respiratory system. It may cause dizziness, rapid heart rate, headaches, confusion, and anemia. Prolonged skin contact with crude oil may cause skin reddening, edema, and burning of the skin. When crude oil is burned, either accidentally or as a spill control measure, it emits chemicals that affect human health. These chemicals include carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, lead, nitrogen oxides, particulate matter, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, sulfur dioxide , and volatile organic compounds. If you are exposed to burning crude oil, you may be exposed to high levels of particulate matter and may experience the health effects of particulate matter. Exposure to burning crude oil may harm the passages of the nose, airways, and lungs. It may cause shortness of breath, difficulty breathing, coughing, itching, red or watery eyes, and black mucous. Handling tarballs may cause an allergic skin reaction or skin rashes. If you think your health has been affected by exposure to crude oil, contact your health care professional. For poisoning emergencies or questions about possible poisons, contact your local poison control center at 1-800-222-1222.
Crude oil also contains hundreds of substances that include benzene, chromium, iron, mercury, nickel, nitrogen, oxygen, sulfur, toluene, and xylene.
Source: toxtown.nlm.nih.gov...
Originally posted by Valorian
reply to post by hornum
That is bullcrap...there is no toxicity as the oil is natural product, it ONLY gets bad when it reaches land or is refined for our use.
The FEMA camps have all their barbed wire facing inwards to keep people in - REMEMBER the nazi camps had the same
think...think...think...then do
Originally posted by danielhanson420
while i believe their is a massive health risk in the area i trust most of your sources as much as i trust msm if not less most of it appears to be fear mongering, that doesn't mean an evacuation is of the table just not as extreme as stated on this thread. and whats with the term sheeple is that how some of you people distinguish others that don't conform to your highly paranoid take on events ?
Originally posted by darkelf
Just to play devil's advocate here, Obama said they were sending in 17,000 troops into the gulf to assist in the cleanup. So if you live along the gulf and see the arival of military troops are you going to worry about forced evacuations? Or will you just think "Those must be the guys the president is sending for the cleanup"?