It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

I found the Loch Ness Monster on Google Earth!

page: 2
14
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 14 2010 @ 08:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by loam
Ok. I easily found the image directly and it isn't the watermark.

But honestly, it looks like lint or a hair caught on the image.




An astronaut pube?


I gotta applaud you for the effort, OP. The video was very clever and the topic is interesting. That said, I'm thinking those anomalies are the result of something other than a dinosaur.



posted on Jun, 14 2010 @ 08:40 PM
link   
Ok, I've seen 12 such objects so far ... here's the others.

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/eb5ea8b717f5.png[/atsimg]

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/0fa21a842a9d.png[/atsimg]

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/c58ecbfcc142.png[/atsimg]

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/a2628e952691.png[/atsimg]

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/b2120cf83430.png[/atsimg]

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/7282884ce21c.png[/atsimg]

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/e7bdcda4f0cd.png[/atsimg]

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/e170c460e9d1.png[/atsimg]

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/957edb867176.png[/atsimg]

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/5041435db420.png[/atsimg]

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/6829505d5209.png[/atsimg]

And nearby to where these objects are is what I think is a fish farm ... maybe Nessie's hanging around for a free meal ?!

Are there's possibly eels ? Does Loch Ness have eels ?



posted on Jun, 14 2010 @ 09:55 PM
link   
decent find, man...yes looks like a bio in the warm part of the thermocline...when no boats are around. i see the body and fins plain as day. an air sighting should have occurred by now.

[edit on 14-6-2010 by GBP/JPY]



posted on Jun, 14 2010 @ 10:23 PM
link   
The thing that gets me is, Im only finding these objects in the same clustered area in the loch, and their all around 15-30 meters (using the google earth measuring tool).

But its that same area that most of the sightings have occurred over the years.



posted on Jun, 14 2010 @ 10:49 PM
link   
Nice effort. This technique ought to be used with a surface crew to help locate any evidence. Perhaps the next search will cultivate this idea?



posted on Jun, 14 2010 @ 11:40 PM
link   

i see the body and fins plain as day.

I am missing where the fins and body are. It looks like floating debris.


CX

posted on Jun, 15 2010 @ 04:47 AM
link   
I've just spoken to a very nice lady at the Loch Ness Vistor Centre, she was very interested but wasn't too sure, so she put me in touch with a couple who run the local boat cruises on the loch.

A very helpfull lady, she said it could of course be many things but did mention something they see a fair bit called "sailors soap". Kind of like long lines of scum/froth that form in lines in the water.

However she is going to ask her partner and there's another guy she said i should talk to at lunch time who may know some more.

I'll let you know how i get on.

The lady i spoke to said they have just recently had the music festival Rock Ness...

www.rockness.co.uk...

I said i wasn't sure how recent Google Earth updates the pics, but i was sure it wasn't a few days old. The thought was these lines could have been debris from the festival?

The possiblity of ropes in the water also came up in conversation. I guess it could be many things really, it will be interesting to find out what it is though.

CX.



posted on Jun, 15 2010 @ 06:55 AM
link   
reply to post by CX
 


Great effort. There is nothing like checking out the actual site to learn more about what is happening.



posted on Jun, 15 2010 @ 07:43 AM
link   
you know that one photo of nessy that was taken in the 1930s the guy who took it on his death bed said it was just a hox he made so adding that photo in to your photos discreadets you .
decides no way are any white lines nessy nessys not white for one thing dark gray >



posted on Jun, 15 2010 @ 08:47 AM
link   

Originally posted by xxcalbier
you know that one photo of nessy that was taken in the 1930s the guy who took it on his death bed said it was just a hox he made so adding that photo in to your photos discreadets you .
decides no way are any white lines nessy nessys not white for one thing dark gray >


Err....How many times have you actually seen Nessie? Somehow I doubt ANYONE knows what Nessie looks like save a few people who may have seen her up close.....

And I'm not certain how having a picture of a "hoax" completely "discredits" him as you say....IMO this is solid evidence....though it's hard to ascertain as to if it is indeed Nessie or not.



posted on Jun, 15 2010 @ 08:51 AM
link   
How many times have you seen Nessie? The person responsible for the photo says it is a hoax. That makes it a hoax. To not realize that the photo was a verified hoax is odd.



posted on Jun, 15 2010 @ 08:57 AM
link   

Originally posted by stereologist
How many times have you seen Nessie? The person responsible for the photo says it is a hoax. That makes it a hoax. To not realize that the photo was a verified hoax is odd.


Don't know if that was meant for me Stereo or not.... But what I meant was...So that picture at the end of his youtube clip is a hoax....Does that completely discredit the OP's evidence...no..it doesn't...since the picture of the "hoax" has NOTHING to do with the evidence he is providing on GE. That was the point I was making, not that the HOAX picture wasn't a HOAX.



posted on Jun, 15 2010 @ 09:29 AM
link   
Sorry about the confusion of the response.

I do not find these images to be compelling since they do not show a body. What I see are lineal features in the water. The wider white features are lumpy, but not of the shape that forms a body, more of a connected sac. I doubt these are just foam on the water. More likely these are "strings" of plant material floating on the surface. I am waiting for a response from the person at the location to tell us what sorts of things are there. Even a trip along the shoreline can tell us if plant materials do wash up on shore. If it is netting or other human trash that would also tell us something about the possibilities of what is being observed.



posted on Jun, 15 2010 @ 09:34 AM
link   

Originally posted by stereologist
Sorry about the confusion of the response.

I do not find these images to be compelling since they do not show a body. What I see are lineal features in the water. The wider white features are lumpy, but not of the shape that forms a body, more of a connected sac. I doubt these are just foam on the water. More likely these are "strings" of plant material floating on the surface. I am waiting for a response from the person at the location to tell us what sorts of things are there. Even a trip along the shoreline can tell us if plant materials do wash up on shore. If it is netting or other human trash that would also tell us something about the possibilities of what is being observed.


Very valid points Stereo, and I completely agree with you here, nothing concrete from this evidence. I've got a question though as I'm not too familiar with bodies of water since I've lived in Ohio my whole life. Erie was pretty nice though.... Anyways....Did I read that most of those pictures are from a more "central" area of the lake? How long would "things" like this remain floating in the center of the lake before boat wakes pushed them out to the coast? Numerically speaking, what are the odds of all these "things" floating in the same general area at the same time without having been pushed more towards the shores?

[edit on 6/15/10 by ElijahWan]



posted on Jun, 15 2010 @ 10:03 AM
link   
reply to post by ElijahWan
 


Excellent questions. I suppose that local information would be needed such as the points of origin and wind and currents. Boat wakes are not going to be important movers of material. The action of wind and currents are going to be primary movers.

I started a search in Lake Erie for similar shapes until I noticed ice along the shore. That's not a good time of year to be looking for search material which would be swept away by drifting ice chunks.

I have located other lineal features in a body of water and will post those images shortly. Some of the lineal features are close to boats.



posted on Jun, 15 2010 @ 10:07 AM
link   

Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by ElijahWan
 


Excellent questions. I suppose that local information would be needed such as the points of origin and wind and currents. Boat wakes are not going to be important movers of material. The action of wind and currents are going to be primary movers.

I started a search in Lake Erie for similar shapes until I noticed ice along the shore. That's not a good time of year to be looking for search material which would be swept away by drifting ice chunks.

I have located other lineal features in a body of water and will post those images shortly. Some of the lineal features are close to boats.



Great Info Stereologist. This is why I always enjoy when your in threads I'm in even if we end up taking opposite stances on the thread. (Not the case here)

You ALWAYS back up your claims with scientific evidence that helps to make me more knowledgeable.

Keep up the good work and I'm looking forward to seeing some of those other pictures for comparison.

On a side note: Does anyone know of those websites where you can put an image in and it will search the web for any "similiar" images? I've been looking for some of those websites for AGES.

[edit on 6/15/10 by ElijahWan]



posted on Jun, 15 2010 @ 10:32 AM
link   
reply to post by LiveForever8
 


As a scientist i got intrigued
How come you dont see the body mass, the entire science lab can see it:= why cant you=?



posted on Jun, 15 2010 @ 10:41 AM
link   
any chance they could be nets?



posted on Jun, 15 2010 @ 11:09 AM
link   
In Denmark there is a connection to the sea which connects to Roskilde where some viking ships were found and are on display in a museum.
I included the following link for those that want to see the area:
Roskilde - Google maps

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/983829fe83d6.jpg[/atsimg]
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/ee8879edee93.jpg[/atsimg]
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/23b667c8ce8c.jpg[/atsimg]

I found these images of lineal features in water in a body of water connected to the sea nearly the same latitude north.


CX

posted on Jun, 15 2010 @ 01:08 PM
link   
Well unfortunately i didn't get much of a response from one of the cruise owners, but then again he didn't have much to work with to start off with.

The reply i got was, "I would not like to comment as the zoomed in image gives no indication of size and the first picture shows nothing!"

Fair enough, i may try someone else from around there though.

Has anyone seen these objects in other stretches of water at all?

CX.




top topics



 
14
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join