It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
NAPERVILLE, Ill., June 4, 2010 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- A Federally-funded scientific panel has found dispersants environmentally helpful in minimizing the amount of oil from the Deepwater Horizon spill reaching national shorelines.
"We are pleased that the scientific review meeting convened at the request of NOAA (the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) by the Coastal Response Research Center recognized the role of dispersants in mitigating the environmental disaster occurring in the Gulf of Mexico," said Dr. Mani Ramesh, Chief Technology Officer of Nalco (NYSE:NLC). "Oil is the issue here and we are glad that the valuable role of dispersants in battling this environmental catastrophe is being recognized by this important committee."
In its report, the panel said: "It is the consensus of this group that up to this point, use of the dispersants and the effects of dispersing oil into the water column has generally been less environmentally harmful than allowing the oil to migrate on the surface into sensitive wetlands and near shore coastal habitats."
May 27 (Reuters) - Nalco Holding Co (NLC.N) said on Thursday the dispersant it is manufacturing to help break up the oil spilling into the Gulf of Mexico is safe.
The Naperville, Illinois company said its product, Corexit, is a simple blend of six well-established ingredients that biodegrade and do not contain carcinogens or reproductive toxins.
Ingredients include those found in body shampoo and fruit juice drinks, Nalco said.
All the ingredients have been extensively studied for many years and have been determined safe and effective by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the company said.
BP Plc (BP.L) (BP.N) has used 850,000 gallons of underwater and aerial dispersants to break up crude flowing from a ruptured well in deep waters off Louisiana.
Environmental watchdogs have said the chemicals used to disperse the oil could endanger marine creatures. EPA earlier this month urged BP to identify and use less toxic dispersants in the Gulf of Mexico.
Originally posted by ~Lucidity
It appears that the cleanup is a bigger disaster in the making than the spill itself.
More than 10,000 workers worked for a summer to wash glue-like oil from cold rocks. After spending more than $2 billion and inflicting untold additional environmental damage through their efforts, the cleanup recovered, at most, 5 to 7 percent of the oil. Some oil still remains in the beaches.
Eventually I realized I had covered the wrong story. The important point wasn’t that Exxon couldn’t clean up its oil spill. The point was, no one could clean it up.
Originally posted by ~Lucidity
It appears that the cleanup is a bigger disaster in the making than the spill itself.
Benzene, incredible amounts of Benzene are being released into the atmosphere and is a clear and present danger not only for the old and people with respiratory problems but the general Gulf population as a whole.
Originally posted by ~Lucidity
In addition, please read and comment on this article, Toxic Oil Spill Rains Warned Could Destroy North America
Is this as bad as it sounds? Are we being kept in the dark?