US Government OFFICIALLY attacks Conspiracy Theories!

If in fact there are no conspiracies, why do you suppose President Obama issued Executive Order 13489 on Jan. 21, 2009, placing further restrictions on the release of presidential records?

- Some “conspiracy nut” could misinterpret this as obstruction of justice.

Since big brother failed to bring forth any facts, here are a few to consider:

1) In 1999, the White house published a PDF document entitled:

"THE SOCIOLOGY AND PSYCHOLOGY OF TERRORISM: WHO BECOMES A TERRORIST AND WHY?" and posted it on the govinfo.library website. The document contained the following prediction:

"Al-Qaida’s expected retaliation for the U.S. cruise missile attack against al-Qaida’s training facilities in Afghanistan on August 20, 1998, could take several forms of terrorist attack in the nation’s capital. Al-Qaida could detonate a Chechen-type building-buster bomb at a federal building. Suicide bomber(s) belonging to al-Qaida’s Martyrdom Battalion could crash-land an aircraft packed with high explosives into the Pentagon, the headquarters of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), or the White House" Whatever form an attack may take, bin Laden will most likely retaliate in a spectacular way”

[someone in the big house has a rather amazing ability]

On June 1, 2001, more restrictive regulations were placed on military interceptions of hijacked aircraft, requiring that all interceptions be approved “at the highest levels of government”.

Then on Sept. 11, 2001, we were told that it had been “inconceivable” for anyone to crash planes into buildings.

This ARTICLE completely destroys the official conspiracy theory about the buildings collapsing on 911.

2) In Oct. of 2001, Senators Daschle and Leahy, who were both initially opposed to the Patriot Act, suddenly withdrew their opposition when they both received letters laced with anthrax.
- It was latter reported that the strain of anthrax had been created by the US Army.
I thought they disposed all that stuff?

3) Lee Harvey Oswald assassinated JFK?
The real assassin disagrees, see JFK MURDER SOLVED

4) No doubt that Obama was born in Hawaii?
There is in fact serious doubt regarding Obama’s place of birth.
It was Obama himself who brought attention to the issue, first by his evasiveness, then by spending several million dollars in legal fees to conceal his records.
Then we have an AP news article from 2004, which states:
“Kenyan-born US Senate hopeful, Barrack Obama…”
Recently, two separate investigations revealed that Obama’s Social Security number was originally issued to someone else, who is now dead. (a SS# is never issued to more than one person)
According to James David Manning, Obama’s entire life history is a fabrication.

5) On May 14, 1987, the Defense Nuclear Agency conducted operation MISTY PICTURE, the fourth in the series of MISTY CASTLE tests. The tests involved detonating a mixture of Ammonium Nitrate and Fuel Oil (ANFO) “to simulate the explosion of a small nuclear bomb“. [Why?]

On April 19, 1995, the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City was destroyed by a mixture of Ammonium Nitrate and Fuel Oil (ANFO)

Note that according to Terry Nichols, before the actual bombing took place, he assisted McVeigh with building a smaller bomb (a test run). - It was a DUD! McVeigh had no idea how to build an ANFO bomb!

Nope, no conspiracies here.

Originally posted by zzombie
Free Thorazine is here if you need government help with those unsettling theories.

www.america.gov...

When I see you Avatar, I just want to smack it and I don't know why

I have this compulsion to do this!

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/f2d5484a81c1.gif[/atsimg]

Sometimes I wonder if they should just put it in our drinking water.

Originally posted by freighttrain
In NON of the topics above do they present "FACTS" nor try to debunk OUR facts, they simply give some lame explanation that summarizes the overall concept in the lamest term so the typical sheeple simply accepts it, since they don't have to "research", "Think" and "question".

To be fair, they do link to this site:

Debunking 9/11 Conspiracy theories and Controlled Demolition Myths

Which includes this pic of WTC 7 that somehow never gets cited here.

The full WTC 7 page.

From another thread on ATS:

Originally posted by seataka
The contrived oil scarcity and the global warming hoax to reduce consumption because of "greenhouse gases" may be a suitable guise AKA "cover story" AKA "shore story" for a coming rapid shift to a little ice age. of course if they have even a limited nuclear exchange in industrialized cities... the amount of carbon soot caused by the burning of plastics (compare quantity of plastics now versus 1945 Nagasaki - none ) - will result in a worldwide nuclear winter scenario.

Even the oil spill, may be related, as a preemptive strike, a desperate one, to reduce evaporation in gulf waters to WARM the earth in preparation for a limited nuclear exchange.

Sailors of old would pour some oil into the sea to calm the raging waters.. oil reduces evaporative cooling

Whatever country controls the most oil will fare a bit better with warm alive citizens instead of frozen starved ones

[edit on 29-6-2010 by seataka]

reply to post by mothershipzeta

Brilliant; thank you for posting...

What is a chronic schizophrenic in 1954?

I think this is a very relevant point...