It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Originally posted by LiquidMirage
If they want my guns they are more than welcome to come and TRY to take them from me. But for any son of a b*#@! that comes I warn you this:
You may get my guns but you will get my bullets first!
sub-human liberal scum
I like your sentiment, but why is this a liberal/conservative thing? Dont you realize you are buying into exactly what is wanted?
Also, you all seem to be missing the point-again, NO UN TREATY CAN SUPERCEDE THE CONSTITUTION.
Originally posted by Misoir
Originally posted by Blueracer
reply to post by Misoir
I care. What is your obsession with law abiding citizens owning guns anyway. It is none of your concern.
It becomes a public issue, and an issue of mine, when there is so much gun violence in our country. We have the highest gun ownership in the world and the highest violence rate in the western world.
So I do believe my safety, is my business.
U.S. Strategy Against Mexican Drug Cartels: Flawed and UncertainPublished on April 26, 2010 by Ray Walser, Ph.D. Abstract: Mexican drug cartels virtually rule large parts of Mexico, with violence and murder spilling across the U.S. border. In 2009, the death toll reached a high of more than 9,000. While the Obama Administration should be commended for its continuation of the Bush Administration’s Mérida Initiative, President Obama and his Cabinet have gone too far in placing the blame for Mexicos drug mayhem on U.S. gun laws and American drug use, and many existing policies have yielded modest results at best. Heritage Foundation Latin America expert Ray Walser lays out the comprehensive plan that the U.S. should follow to stem the tide of drug violence—or pay even higher costs down the road.
Originally posted by ANNED
The joke is i have a small hobby machine shop.
They take my guns and i have been collecting the plans for making new guns.
The only thing about my collection of plans is most are for full auto weapons.
I can also make black powder cannons and have a couple of 2 inch ones already.
Load them with BBs and they are better then claymore mines.
I also have recipes for stuff that goes bang.
No worries i will share the plans and recipes with anyone if the time comes.
Originally posted by ANNED
opps....double post
[edit on 1-6-2010 by seeashrink]
Originally posted by LiquidMirage
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Originally posted by LiquidMirage
If they want my guns they are more than welcome to come and TRY to take them from me. But for any son of a b*#@! that comes I warn you this:
You may get my guns but you will get my bullets first!
sub-human liberal scum
I like your sentiment, but why is this a liberal/conservative thing? Dont you realize you are buying into exactly what is wanted?
Also, you all seem to be missing the point-again, NO UN TREATY CAN SUPERCEDE THE CONSTITUTION.
That is where you are wrong.
It is a liberal/conservative (or actually a progressive/conservative) thing! You are making the mistake of assuming that the scum bag republicans that claim to be conservative are indeed conservatives. They are not! In fact, the republicans are progressives almost as much as the scum bags in the other party. That is why bush acted like a democrat...he is a progressive. It is also why obama has escalated the war (continuing bush policies)...he is a progressive. It is the progressive (aka liberal) scum that are taking our rights away from us. It is progressive scum that will TRY to take our guns!
Edit to add:
I am not missing any point. The progressives are doing anything and everything they can to destroy the U.S. Constitution and the country as a result. Did you miss that?
[edit on 1-6-2010 by LiquidMirage]
Originally posted by KyoZero
Originally posted by azrael36
And who says the govt is better armed than its citizens are?
[edit on 1-6-2010 by azrael36]
The military does....
Weapons of the US Military
Vehicles of the US Military
Aircraft of the US Military
Got a few A-10's in the house these days do ya?
Look I don't agree that the guns should be taken but I am sorry...if you think we can beat the US military in a battle with our AK-47's and M-16's..well that would be an interesting fight.
I know...I know...we beat the redcoats with like 3 people compared to their billion
The redcoats had guns and cannons...so did we
Now we as the militia men have rifles and mortar tubes...they have A-10's, M1A1 Abrams and CBU/GBU. If you don't see an SORELY one-sided fight there then you'll have to pardon me while I take a step or 5000 back when this firecracker of a battle goes off.
If they wanted to pry the guns out of our fingers they would do it despite the machismo we think we have because we have a basement full of semi, burst and full-autos.
AK47 vs A-10 Warthog....awesome
M-16 on full-auto vs BLU-82B...I'll make my wager
Not saying it would come to that but I gotta abimt I am very curious about something. What makes gun-owners think they can beat the US military? I am a gun owner and I am pretty sure even if I became a crack shot, my .40 would do next to nothing to the arsenal at their disposal.
Sorry...it really get's me interested when we think some private militia will win this.
-Kyo