It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Oneolddude
reply to post by Paradigm2012
The internet and amazing computer programs have made "experts" out of idiots.
They think everything can be explained away as a hoax because it can be reproduced with a computer program.
No true investigator or real expert would ever make such quick assertions.
So much for the ATS "experts'
ATS gives these people their own little world to be "somebody".
I'll wait until bona fide experts and educators give their opinions before I call this a hoax.
Originally posted by Ashcool007
reply to post by countercounterculture
ok I ll try again you have two videos so if u can assume two different distance
of the incidents happening (Disregard angle as it will make it complicated) Take Camera A ground and Camera B for the plane.
Assuming Camera A Distance = x in m and Camera B Distance = y in m, c the speed of light c = 3 * 10^8 m/s
IF you can understand this here is my solution................
Time taken by the exploding light to Reach Camera A = (x/c) in seconds
Time taken by the exploding light to Reach Camera B = (y/c) in seconds
If you know the exact distances you will see that for the camera B the time taken will be more than the time taken for camera A.....
How's this explanation
BTW Outside someone who actually does this for a living, explain to me who would qualify as a "bona fide expert"?
Originally posted by FSMthewayshegoes
I know it looks CGI
But i saw this s**t yesterday with my naked eyes, while driving in that general area.
Say what you want to say but I saw what I saw.
Originally posted by Maybe...maybe not
Originally posted by FSMthewayshegoes
I know it looks CGI
But i saw this s**t yesterday with my naked eyes, while driving in that general area.
Say what you want to say but I saw what I saw.
I saw it too!
Originally posted by Chadwickus
Originally posted by Paradigm2012
Exactly you did no investigation at all. If you did a real investigation I would not point out your sloppy work.
2. Did the people who heard the loud boom hear it because of a CGI fake?
The people who heard the boom are the ones who submitted the videos and pictures.....where are all the other people who would have heard the loud boom?
No reports AT ALL of loud booms that night.
Hell, even the video of the event HAS NO BOOM.
Woops!
What looked like numerous photographs and videos of a ship entering the cosmos was actually put together by not a team, but one person.
Kevin Martin, a Southern California Weatherman has come forward as the hoaxer to what is likely the biggest hoax ever created.
Martin claims he e-mailed the material to TheWeatherSpace.com in an effort to test a theory of his out.
"Who is more gullible, Americans or Europeans?", asked Martin. "A growing number of conspiracy theorists are American, while Europe seems to have their head on straighter to the facts. I decided to test it out with a half done CGI video and photoshop photo stills, sending it to Betty Morgan at TheWeatherSpace.com Space News section."
Martin claims that his theory was correct, Europeans have a better handle on reality than Americans.
Upon further investigation it seems like Martin is a master at marketing, graphics, and even manipulation. TheWeatherSpace.com was fooled and I apologize for that.
Originally posted by countercounterculture
reply to post by StevesResearch
BTW Outside someone who actually does this for a living, explain to me who would qualify as a "bona fide expert"?
Me.
Why? Because I can guarantee my answer will be 60% correct 100% of the time.
Whats the answer to the old CGI vs Real video predicament?
I think that this video might offer some probable consideration to the question of whether or not this may, most likely, be somewhat like CGI graphics. However one must also take into account that on some accounts there is the chance that in some circumstances some people might consider thinking about confirming the possibility it could actually under the right conditions be real.
Kevin Martin, a Southern California Weatherman has come forward as the hoaxer to what is likely the biggest hoax ever created.
Originally posted by ReginaAdonnaAaron
Okay, so - I've now read an entire thread of ATSers saying this is a hoax, but is there actual outside ATS proof that it's a hoax? Or is everyone just in agreement therefore it is?
Originally posted by OrionHunterX
Wow! Reams of precious ATS 'paper' just wasted! Here's the truth from the horse's mouth!
Canadian UFO Spiral hoaxer comes forward
(Kevin Martin, the designer and developer of the Western Canada UFO Spiral Hoax apologizes).
What looked like numerous photographs and videos of a ship entering the cosmos was actually put together by not a team, but one person.
Kevin Martin, a Southern California Weatherman has come forward as the hoaxer to what is likely the biggest hoax ever created.
Martin claims he e-mailed the material to TheWeatherSpace.com in an effort to test a theory of his out.
"Who is more gullible, Americans or Europeans?", asked Martin. "A growing number of conspiracy theorists are American, while Europe seems to have their head on straighter to the facts. I decided to test it out with a half done CGI video and photoshop photo stills, sending it to Betty Morgan at TheWeatherSpace.com Space News section."
Martin claims that his theory was correct, Europeans have a better handle on reality than Americans.
Upon further investigation it seems like Martin is a master at marketing, graphics, and even manipulation. TheWeatherSpace.com was fooled and I apologize for that.
Well...? There's a sucker born every minute!
www.theweatherspace.com...
[edit on 24-5-2010 by OrionHunterX]