Gulf Oil spill - looks more like a Vulcano. ( Video )

Can it really be a conspiracy ?

I've just seen this vid. and it sounds like the guy is making a lot of sense.
I'm no expert tho...

What can you make of the explanation in the vid. ? Is it plausible ? Can someone confirm if this is possible.



Almost 11 minutes.

I hope this isn't true but I have not yet seen it posted.

~ SK

THere are alot of people speculating in this..

Have a look..





He talk about that HaliBurton bought up Boots & Cootes just one week before the spill happend, and Haliburton was on the Rig only 20 hours before the spill doing 'repairs'..

Crude is not always black, this guy doesn't know what he is talking about as far as the color of crude oil. Crude comes in all different shades and viscosities. The colors usually tend to be darker, between black and brown. Also, the density is usually between 700 - 1000 kg/cu m and kinematic viscosity can be anywhere between 1 and around 7 or possibly 8 cSt or centistokes.

This is clearly oil.

Just my 2 cents.

--airspoon



Edited to add: "also".

[edit on 22-5-2010 by airspoon]

[edit on 22-5-2010 by airspoon]

First, I have to ask just what the heck is a vulcano? I have heard of
volcano's before, but a vulcano?

Next, this guy doesn't have a clue as to what he is talking about. He said
that crude oil is as black as tar. My father was a wildcatter, and I have
seen hundreds of jars of oil from all kinds of producers. They range from
reddish orange or brownish all the way up to this black colored crude
this "expert" from Norway or where ever claims. He admittedly says his
country drills for mostly gas. Well, that is nice. He obviously has never
been around a "real" oilwell, and should keep his expert wisdom to
himself. I can't believe all of the experts floating around this issue. And no,
I am not an expert either, but I have been around oil all of my life, and have
seen just about all there is to see as far as colors go.

It only looks like a volcano because the videos are speeded up.

And saying that is a volcano it's one of most stupid things that could be said, that guy does not know what he is talking about.

Originally posted by ArMaP
It only looks like a volcano because the videos are speeded up.

And saying that is a volcano it's one of most stupid things that could be said, that guy does not know what he is talking about.

Not to argue, but haven't you seen the live feed videos of this? The video
is not speeded up. It is shown in real time. And I agree, the term volcano
OR vulcano isn't even close to what is going on here. It is bad, no doubt
about that, but this isn't Mt. St. Helens going off here.

Ok Ok I am no expert however I too wondered why the slick was not black and did not look like any oil spill that I have ever seen all be it on television .Then came the video of the oil gushing from the broken oil drill base and the first thing that came to my mind was wow that looks just like a hydrothermal vent the same as the ones that have been found in the deepest parts of the ocean and that supported life where none should exist. Here are the vids side by side. I am not saying I believe its not oil but I can see where this guy is coming from.


[edit on 22-5-2010 by tarifa37]

That's why I love ATS. Thanks guys !

Reply to post by Chembreather.

Wow... That could be the biggest conspiracy around thanks.
I suggest you make a thread on it. It isn't getting any attention in this one.

reply to post by tarifa37


They are looking very similar indeed... I've noticed.

It was the reason for this post.

reply to post by Sinter Klaas


I would also point out that there are many many underwater active volcanoes so the assertion that this is the 3rd of the water being struck is wishful thinking to doomsday fans.

reply to post by ChemBreather


The problem with that is that I don't see that the reasons presented (or any other reason) would be enough for someone to try to make something like a huge oil spill, it doesn't make sense.

reply to post by ArMaP



Its a bit like a fireman setting fires so he can get paid to put them out. What bigger reason in this twisted world than money is there? I have to add that its still far fetched and probably just a coincidence. Also is there any world disaster or war that Dick bloody Cheney hasn't got links with ? That man sure gets around.




[edit on 22-5-2010 by tarifa37]

reply to post by ArMaP


There are a lot of pages full of written history that don't make any sense.
People are crazy ( On occasion )

What if they know more ?
There are a lot of stories around for a long time that would easily explain such action.

Yet... What if isn't much to go from.

reply to post by ararisq


You've got a point. However I don't remember any submerged volcano leaving a massive oil like spill.

reply to post by tarifa37


It's more like a fireman that works only for some companies setting fire to one of those companies' properties and expecting to get away with it.

Do you think that BP would let that go? They are losing tons of crude and they will have to pay millions in compensations and they wouldn't try to find a different suspect?

That's why I don't believe in this "Halliburton did it" theory.

But I wouldn't be surprised if BP is using this spill to try to find a way of pumping the crude oil directly to the ships without having to use a platform, and that's probably why they insist in using the opened holes.

reply to post by ArMaP


So BP could have done this themselves ?
It would save a lot money on the lease of an oil rig.

If it ever comes out this was planned... Those responsible should be punished. On the spot IMO.

reply to post by Sinter Klaas

I don't think they did it on purpose, only that they used this opportunity to try something new.

reply to post by ArMaP


Probably yes.

That is however no excuse for the lack of a fully functioning safety procedure.
We... well a lot of us are probably spending way to much time on ATS.

There are a lot of dots that can be connected here... could just as well mean nothing at all.

I just hate this feeling not being able to do anything about anything.
With a surface oil spill you could at least clean some birds or something.

Originally posted by ArMaP
reply to post by tarifa37

 

But I wouldn't be surprised if BP is using this spill to try to find a way of pumping the crude oil directly to the ships without having to use a platform, and that's probably why they insist in using the opened holes.

That's what I'm thinking, instead of coming up with a definite and quick solution, BP is looking for a way to harvest some of the oil from this oil field. Once the holes are plugged, this oil field most likely won't be touched again, due to popular opinion after this disaster. BP struck gold with this oil field and to say goodbye to it while having to pay a ton of money for clean up, would be a double loss for the company. My money would be on the theory that BP is looking for a solution that would allow them to harvest some of this oil, even to the extent that they are passing up more sure-fire and/or quick solutions that wouldn't allow for pumping the oil.

It's quite a shame because I used to fish these waters with my dad, when I was growing up and in fact, I was just fishing down there, tied off to the oil-rigs a couple of Christmases ago (on Christmas day actually). It's too bad that I won't be able to take my children down there to give them the rich experiences that I had when I was a youngster. We used to pull some monster red-fish and drum out of those waters, though a couple of Christmases ago, we caught so many speckled trout that we were having to throw back at least half of them due to storage space.

There are so many families whose livelihoods depend on fishing those waters, in fact whole communities who were just devastated by Katrina and now they are watching their fishing grounds go black due to what seems like pure greed.

--airspoon

Hmm thats very interesting. A crazy theory but interesting. And yes it does look like a volcano.