"Psychology 222"

I'm speaking from your shoes with the following...

1. If I want to be a killer, I can be a killer. Like who isn't a killer? You've killed bugs.

2. If I want to be a psyciatist, I can be a psyciatrist. Like who isn't a psyciatrist? You've dianosed other people not you, without a license to do so.

3. If I want to be not you, I can be not you. Like who isn't not you? You've actually been just yourself.

4. If I want to be you, I can be you. Like who isn't you? You've put words in others mouths as if you are them.

5. If I want to be an ATS member, I can be an ATS member. Like who isn't an ATS member? Ha. You've been a long time lurker or became a poster which qualifies you as either an indirect member or direct member, nonetheless.


The point is, is you can be what you want to be with or without , say, a degree/license. Am I lying? Or which of you can't be what you want to be? And why is that? For those who cant be what they want are as a slave or are with the slave mentality embeded.

By the way, you are living illegal when you act as a psychiatrist without a license. Again, am I lying? How many of you find yourself acting as one, even though you know you are not licensed to be one? ATS is full of them just as many other message board forums. Looks like the internet is filled with the criminal minded who act as something that requires a license. Hell, it can be enough to make a man puke When you don't know the difference between right and wrong you could find yourself living illegal, even though an actual, licensed psyciatrist would dianose you as mentally ill for not being able to realize you are doing wrong when you only act like one of them. Then those of you who do know it's wrong to do illegal activity, and just don't care, well you know what a psyciatrist would dianose you as... Psychopathic/sociopathic. So if you find yourself as having been living illegal, and got some nerve to talk down on, say, an anarchist who lives illegal in another way than some unlicensed psychiatrist, then what's that say about you Ms. or Mr. HOLIER THAN THOU? It says you act like your crap don't stink. And I'm here to say, hey, flush that crappy attitude right now, before the noose gets tighter about your neck, and you do yourself a disservice in the presence of the people you loved to hate.

For whenever wisdom speaks the guilty tremble. Next person that asks you if you're mentally ill, just ask them are they a licensed psycriatrist. And that should be the end of it, especially if and when they can not show you their license. And it is damn stupid if they are a licensed psyciatrist praticing over the internet to the unsuspecting. Hey, that's just something that tells you how indeed they should not be licensed right there.

For the corrupt in every field are amongst. The corrupt are a living inspiration for EVERYTHING I never want to be. The two genuine Gods that be present need to blindfold the crooked PTB amongst, and take them down like sitting fake ducks at a target practice.


Tormentations the official and authentic L.J.C.

[edit on 18-5-2010 by Tormentations]

First off a psychiatrist and a psychologist are two different things.

Two, its only "illegal" if you practice it as a profession without a license. That means you are paid for your advisory.

So no one on ATS is committing a crime.

Also, you can ask someone if the are mentally ill and not be an anything. Especially if you think that they might be, and they might have seen a professional doctor.

It takes no psychologist or psychiatrist to see that someone maybe crazy or ill in the head if they walked around naked outside with human limb in their hand. There was sociopath serial killer that would collect his victims organs and walk around with them in his pocket.

I'm just saying, I don't think you are lying, but there is a little more too it than you mentioned.

Originally posted by juveous That means you are paid for your advisory.

So no one on ATS is committing a crime.

Look at that. My, my. Looking out for criminal minded people?

If you just simply don't care, then you are sociapathic upon if you are continueing in acting as an unlicensed psychiatrist. Hey, I didn't make up the word "sociopathic." For it was made a long time ago for a good damn reason that I can surely see why. Those that simply don't care will turn a blind eye to the fact they are doing wrong.

Nothing more funnier than a sociopath that doesn't see when they are being a sociopath. Defending those who live illegal is the same as acting as an unlicensed lawyer. Again, that is living illegal, but the holier than thou types will intentionally NOT SEE that.

reply to post by Tormentations


*sigh

yes. I'm looking out for criminal minded people.

We, by the long arm of the law, can't have people unlicensed and online dianosing people left and right. We, by the long arm of the law, can't have people licensed and online dianosing people left and right either.


Destroy this temple with illegal dianosings, is something we just can't have going on. A person's temple is their person and their physical body. You destroy people's lives when you set out to do dianosings corruptedly. And you that care not that you're doing wrong, do know what you're trying to do world wide with the help of the internet. Again, the guilty do tremble when they hear wisdom drop the heavy hammer down during a real live judement day come to light.

And the current www. internet. com. is an outlaws haven. The pathetic thing is, is that the government only chooses to uphold the law when it comes to someone making death threats online. But like damn. Do you see how justice turns a blind eye on the illegal activities going on in plain sight on say message boards in particular? Do you see the unlicensed doing the illegal acts of acting as psychiatrists that do dianoses on other people they do not even pysically see standing before them? Do you see the unlicensed lawyers act as practicing law in giving supposed good legal advice? Again, you and I do see justice not seeking to go after the criminal, since justice is led by the crooked PTB.

WWJD? Raise his Godly temple up in three days against the broad destruction that has been going on by the hand of the sinful Mr. every man (the many-membered wicked one). Think of all the humans that are members of the wicked one... They want to be involved in a bad boy way.

Just because it's not legal, does not make it unlawful. Know the difference, if you are to rant on the rights and wrongs of existence.

Tormentations.. indeed.

reply to post by Tormentations

The point is, is you can be what you want to be with or without , say, a degree/license. Am I lying? Or which of you can't be what you want to be? And why is that? For those who cant be what they want are as a slave or are with the slave mentality embeded.

okay so you said the above quote. Then you go against what you say by condemning people who try to be something, all because they aren't licensed to do whatever...

So I need to ask: Where is YOUR license to be the BEAST?
Where is YOUR license to be the Lord Jesus Christ?
Where is YOUR license to be the King of kings?
Where is YOUR license to be Lord of lords?
Where is YOUR license to be a prophet?
Where is YOUR license to preach to everyone in all your threads?

Did you give all your licenses to your 3 spirit wives to keep in their spirit purses?

Or is your right hand man, the second Beast Tupac Shakur holding onto your licenses for you?

If you have proof for all you claim to be, I ask you to do what you TELL us to.
Show your licenses to us. Give us some PROOF.



[edit on 18/5/2010 by Chamberf=6]

Originally posted by Tormentations
The point is, is you can be what you want to be with or without , say, a degree/license. Am I lying? Or which of you can't be what you want to be? And why is that? For those who cant be what they want are as a slave or are with the slave mentality embeded.
[edit on 18-5-2010 by Tormentations]

So... would u be willing to have your nervous system operated on by a person who saw an operation on a tv drama and genuinely believe they are capable to do it too, completely based on their own impulsive decision? ... Or trust the doctor that dedicated him/herself to over a decade of studies/schooling/trainig and has experience in the field, and had also preformed similar surgeries prior to meeting with you?

Point being the title is earned, not given.

I respect, understand and follow your premiss, but i dont believe in taking short-cuts to reach them. One should take the time to research and become knowledgable of the practice.

True, a degree/license is literally just a peice of paper with words on it, but it is just something tangible to show and recognize the amount of time, effort, and background the individual put into that particular field.

Realistically, some things just arn't for everybody. Don't believe me? Join the MMA without training or any background in fighting and claim you are just as good as the rest. You'll learn quick

reply to post by purplemonkeydishwasher


The only thing considered not legal that is not unlawful is a letter that is not legal in size. Ha ha. You are funny trying to pull what you just tried to. It still remains that those practicing psychiatry online are doing wrong by the law. Wrong is when you break the law. Right is when you adhere to and uphold the law.

Judement day is a total recall. For the age of humankind been perceived way before it even came to happen in the physical array.


[edit on 19-5-2010 by Tormentations]

Originally posted by Tormentations
reply to post by purplemonkeydishwasher

 

The only thing considered not legal that is not unlawful is a letter that is not legal in size. Ha ha. You are funny trying to pull what you just tried to. It still remains that those practicing psychiatry online are doing wrong by the law. Wrong is when you break the law. Right is when you adhere to and uphold the law.

Judement day is a total recall. For the age of humankind been perceived way before it even came to happen in the physical array.


[edit on 19-5-2010 by Tormentations]

Wait a minute.

This entire time you havn't even been refering to the laws of our current justice system.
You are referring to some "supreme law" - divine law.

Am I lying?

Originally posted by juveous

Originally posted by Tormentations
reply to post by purplemonkeydishwasher

 

The only thing considered not legal that is not unlawful is a letter that is not legal in size. Ha ha. You are funny trying to pull what you just tried to. It still remains that those practicing psychiatry online are doing wrong by the law. Wrong is when you break the law. Right is when you adhere to and uphold the law.

Judement day is a total recall. For the age of humankind been perceived way before it even came to happen in the physical array.


[edit on 19-5-2010 by Tormentations]

Wait a minute.

This entire time you havn't even been refering to the laws of our current justice system.
You are referring to some "supreme law" - divine law.

Am I lying?

Still trying huh? Haha. The law is the law of the land that the justice system is supposed to go by when people break the law. So there, I just corrected you. If you dont want to go by the law, then that's you. You can do what you want to in life, correct? You know it.

Just because the Gods perceived that humankind wouldn't go by certain of its own laws, doesn't mean I cant speak on that.

Ha.

Originally posted by Tormentations
Just because the Gods perceived that humankind wouldn't go by certain of its own laws, doesn't mean I cant speak on that.

Ha.

No your're right it doesn't. But you sure didn't state any of that in the beginning of the thread.

Tormentations, I enjoy your posts, and I've said so. They are thought provoking, and I like that. I'm afraid I don't get the point here, my friend. Anything anyone says here is opinion, no more, no less, and that's true even for educated opinion. None of us is in a state of perfection, and none of us is infallable. I've been in treatment and taking meds for depression for almost 9 years. With 32 years medical experience, and a monster background in the natural sciences, and a high medical vocabulary, I recognize I am not a psychiatrist. If I write about what I've learned over the years about the mechanisms of mental disorders, and I realize I am only expressing an opinion, am I wrong in doing so? Many posts here are really intended to encourage you do do your own research of the point in question. The first thing I thought was, "Tors been in the tequila again", laughing as I thought about it. Everything is for a point of discussion here, but I wonder what you are so angry about.

why the "222"? is that just a number u picked like saying "english 101"?

Originally posted by TheCoffinman
why the "222"? is that just a number u picked like saying "english 101"?

I like to incorperate a mystery revealed in my life in my threads.

Sometimes at least.

I used to see 222 a lot on the time, and even had the room number 222 twice in two different states. They were assigned dorm rooms I didnt have any pick over. But I finally grasped the meaning behind it. It has to do with a Godly array of true riches also being my even, top brides.

Originally posted by deadred
Tormentations, I enjoy your posts, and I've said so. They are thought provoking, and I like that. I'm afraid I don't get the point here, my friend. Anything anyone says here is opinion, no more, no less, and that's true even for educated opinion. None of us is in a state of perfection, and none of us is infallable. I've been in treatment and taking meds for depression for almost 9 years. With 32 years medical experience, and a monster background in the natural sciences, and a high medical vocabulary, I recognize I am not a psychiatrist. If I write about what I've learned over the years about the mechanisms of mental disorders, and I realize I am only expressing an opinion, am I wrong in doing so? Many posts here are really intended to encourage you do do your own research of the point in question. The first thing I thought was, "Tors been in the tequila again", laughing as I thought about it. Everything is for a point of discussion here, but I wonder what you are so angry about.

No, you're not breaking the law in doing so in talking about what you've learned, but if you dianose somebody online, then you would be breaking the law.

reply to post by Tormentations


Care to discuss the sometimes serious problems that come up when practicing something without proper training? Look I am not saying a license automatically makes you a psychologist by any means. In two short years my degree and LPC license will give me the legal right to practice but it doesn’t make me a good therapist. What makes someone a good therapist is their ability and talent that was in them before they got that license. Now you can go be an amateur and fake psychologist if you want. You can be a good listener and friend if you want. Hell you can give advice and I will even go so far as to say if you want to pick up the DSM and diagnose then fire away because YOU are the one doing the damage. All those diagnoses in the DSM equate to records and insurance. It isn’t a god-like bible. It helps LPCs and full fledged MD’s code for billing, records, universal recognition and insurance. One of the issues I have with the system is that often times your insurance won’t cover you for extended times in my office unless I get a DSM or proper ICD code. Silly system but I digress…

The problem with a random person pretending to be a therapist is that often (I am not saying all) there are inherent emotional damages if you don’t know all the fine details there is to know when diagnosing or treating. I am not just saying this because I will have a license soon, rather I am saying nobody without proper training and job training should be attempting medicine or therapy. There are so many subtleties that when ignore can inflict terrible damage.

There is a huge difference between saying things like “If you need to talk I am here” or “I understand how you feel, here is what I do” and saying “Well I think you have classical histrionic disorder. We should have you on an SSRI” Big difference. I don’t think people wanting to help or saying “that sounds a lot like me when I am depressed” is near the same as a full on diagnosis. Saying that you listen to this music to get you out of your depression is the same as administering psychotherapy or CBT. I am always going to continue to help friends but until I get that training and learn those subtleties there is no way I am going to pretend to be a therapist yet.

Now if you are saying this to cast doubt or down the therapeutic system than that’s fine but no offense, unless I am just feeling blue I am going to pick the actual therapist over my friend.

my thoughts…nothing more

-Kyo

reply to post by Tormentations


So if you have 3 wives, I suppose you have 3 mothers IN-LAW. Do you recognize them in how you see law? I should say in how you state the law, as you see it.

What law has any power over you, O King of kings? None?
What about your right hand man Tupac Shakur? He broke many REAL laws before he was shot. Since you say he is resurrected, have his crimes been wiped clean?

And when you say you stayed in two "dorm" rooms that you had no choice over, where were these rooms located? I wonder if the prophet was not at a college but in another type of "institution". Was 222 your assigned number?

So if someone claims to be a psychologist but they do not actually have a license, they are engaged in a crime. That makes sense to me.

Yet, if someone is actually a licensed psychologist and reveals this online, they are automatically considered to be engaged in a criminal activity for diagnosing people over the internet?

What a pickle! Looks like pseudo-psychologists and psychologists alike are in a catch-22

I will say that it is unethical for any licensed psychologist to make a conclusion or diagnosis regarding someone's mental status without conducting a proper evaluation predicated upon an INFORMED CONSENT agreement between both parties.



[edit on 19-5-2010 by MKULTRA]