It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Raustin
reply to post by wookiee
I do expect them to copy it. That is sort of the problem. The fact that the parents condone it is what really bothers me. If it were 15 year olds, I could almost understand. These girls are under the age of ten however. I find it appalling that you write it off as a non issue.
Originally posted by catwhoknows
reply to post by RestingInPieces
I am not a paedophile - have you read my posts?
I am a protector of kids.
Originally posted by Zosynspiracy
reply to post by dalan.
Pedo alert! Pedo Alert! Pedo Alert! LMAO!
Originally posted by tellmemoreok
I dunno...I think those girls have a lot of talent...maybe a little young for those moves though..if we protest something I think we should protest This video.
That is one of the problems. When do we draw the line?
Originally posted by catwhoknows
reply to post by kiwifoot
Hi Kiwi, you are so right!
Let us stand by our children in this country, and not do what this post is about, and let us save all children on the planet.
Let our children be innocent, cared for and loved.
Originally posted by dalan.
Do you have kids? Well there's your line...now don't cross and leave every other person's children alone, ...
Originally posted by Wolf321
Originally posted by dalan.
Do you have kids? Well there's your line...now don't cross and leave every other person's children alone, ...
Exactly people! Stop criticizing the slutification of our children. Just quietly care for your own kids and let society degrade until total chaos and anarchy rule completely. Then society will come after your sweet kids by force.
Slippery Slope
In debate or rhetoric, a slippery slope (sometimes misstated as thin edge of the wedge, or the camel's nose) is a classical informal fallacy. A slippery slope argument states that a relatively small first step inevitably leads to a chain of related events culminating in some significant impact, much like an object given a small push over the edge of a slope sliding all the way to the bottom.[1] The fallacious sense of "slippery slope" is often used synonymously with continuum fallacy, in that it ignores the possibility of middle ground and assumes a discrete transition from category A to category B. Modern usage avoids the fallacy by acknowledging the possibility of this middle ground.
I wouldn't use the word disturbed, but how does someone know what would appeal to a pedophile, unless they are either a pedophile or a doctor who studies pedophiles? I think that's a valid question.
Originally posted by Wolf321
The whole idea that anyone who sees the sexuality of these kids in this particular performance is actually the disturbed persons is asinine.
OK lets ask the question another way. Three of the 21 year olds are shapely, and three of the 21 year olds are morbidly obese. Could the three shapely girls be considered sexy? Well yes but because they are sexy by our definition of having a shapely body, even if they don't move. Are the three morbidly obese 21 year olds sexy? Well maybe to someone they are, but to me personally, and I suspect a lot of people, probably not. Wearing that skimpy outfit will actually make them look less sexy. So what have we learned from this? It's the shapely body that makes them sexy, not the outfit.
ut it this way. If this group were all a bunch of 21 year old well-endowed models, doing the same thing, in the same outfits, would it not be considered sexy, sexual or downright erotic? Of course it would!
Children aren't sexy. To me. Neither are the morbidly obese 21 year old dancers wearing the same outfit, to me.
Children should not be made to be, appear or behave 'sexy.'
Originally posted by Unity_99
Girls dont think people should be looking at them the wrong way, the onus is on the viewer to not have strange thoughts. Kids arent sexy.
Originally posted by v3_exceed
Originally posted by Blanca Rose
Originally posted by v3_exceed
Because you know the parents had ANYTHING to do with the costumes. You have zero sense of rational. It's a dance routine people.
Excuse me, when kids are this age, the parents take them for lessons, and know exactly what the costumes for such a production will look like before the show. They probably also took their kids for fittings, so YES, they knew ahead of time what the routine, and costumes would look like.
If they had protested enough about the costumes looking like lingerie, they would have been changed!
Having had 2 daughters go through formal ballet, I can assure you that you are 100% wrong. The parents bring them into the class in basic leotards and the correct shoes, the schools do the fittings. Kids at this level are not entrusted with the actual costumes, especially for something at a production level such as this. The parents may have been at dress rehearsals maybe not.
Secondly protesting the costume would not get the costumes changed, but might get your child excluded from an otherwise important moment in her life.
The costumes look nothing like lingerie, a swimsuit reveals more, and dare I say that if you think this is lingerie you really need to shop more. I suspect that you are just jealous of these young girls and using this as an opportunity to vent. Back to your bridge now.
..Ex