It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by The Matrix Traveller
reply to post by The Matrix Traveller
There a 110 different original Versions (Greek) of The Revelation of J.C.
The Version used by the Romans, in what is known as the bible today is just one of 110 different versions and has also been modified...
The Star wormwood does not relate to the Stars that most think of...
In The Revelation of J.C. Chapter 1 verse 20. is just one example...
The 7 Stars are the Angels of the 7 Assemblies..
In later English versions the word "Assemblies" was changed to "churches".
An angel is Not what people interpret today.
These Stars or Angels are 6 Pointed Stars as is the Star of DAVID which is also known as the Root of DAVID...
The Waters Mentioned, are to do with the Face of the Deep NOT the Sea.....
It never ceases to amaze me how the human species insists in Humanising the writings when in fact these Writings are Not about the Flesh but instead involves the Soul and its Workings.
By humanising the writings does not make them about the descendants of A'DAM or any Flesh. They still remain a Parable regarding the Structure and history of the Soul.
[edit on 15-5-2010 by The Matrix Traveller]
39. Jesus said,
“The Pharisees and the Scribes
have taken The Keys of Knowledge
and Hidden Them.
They themselves have NOT entered,
nor have they allowed to enter
those who wish to.
The Wormwood of Revelation refers to a star falling into the waters which does not refer to the faces of the deep as you claim.
Originally posted by dzonatas
Mark of the Beast may not be required anymore. Is it a conspiracy to suggest that it still is required? Or, is it just a traditional ritual being re-played out for no better reason than: people haven't yet realized that event already happened.
If we look at the bible there are a few versus that cover pros and cons of the Mark of the Beast. I'm tempted to list several verses that cover the topic, yet I hesitate about the translation of the scriptures to be close enough, or even the original writers to be competent spellers. The overall suggestions made by the versus, however, make it seem as if the events already occurred. It begs the question of why people would preach as if it hasn't even happened. This contradiction between past tense in the versus, even in their questionable state, and the preached version as if it is in future tense is what suggests the conspiracy.
If Satan doesn't think Mark of the Beast is of any worth anymore, then the question is who or why would people to continue the ritual to make it worth something.
I put this is the Origin & Creationism forum for discussion because it exposes the bible as a 'book of memories' rather than a 'book of prophecy'. I don't mean to disrespect people's faith in this subject, yet I do think this past/future issue is a technical issue that needs to be cleared-up about this subject.
It's like why don't people ever walk about to the preachers and say: why do you ignore the fact the bible shows it already happened so why preach it still is going to happen like it never happened? Do they not want use to see the bible as case law for origins and rather have us see it only to support their ideal purist Creationism?
51. His disciple said to Him,
“When will the repose of the dead come about,
and when will the New World come?”
He said to them,
“What you look forward to has already come,
but you do Not recognise it.”
45. I will that there be prepared
Holy SOULS for Me.
Originally posted by dzonatas
Mark of the Beast may not be required anymore. Is it a conspiracy to suggest that it still is required? Or, is it just a traditional ritual being re-played out for no better reason than: people haven't yet realized that event already happened.