It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
NPR reported late Thursday that scientific analysis of a video of the leak, released Wednesday by BP, put the rate closer to 70,000 barrels a day, making the resulting spill already far worse than the 1989 Exxon Valdez incident in Alaska
lol at that relax guy
Originally posted by bakadesu
reply to post by Just Wondering
Hey, Just Wondering, is this a comment to say you were wrong with your "Relax" post?
is this bad enough for you yet? or should we still Relax. ?
Originally posted by dr dodge
look at the video. its volume is at least 1/2 high density natural gas (methane)
if you calculate the volume of that gas, expanded to atmospheric pressure, it = 30,000 / 14.5 = 2068
that means one cubic foot of gas will be A MINIMUM of 2068 cu ft
and most is still stuck in frozen slurry on the bottom, and has not come out yet
my opinion is that a hurricane, coming from the ocean with no gas, would slowly suck the gas up until saturation point is acheived. Imaging the low pressure in the center of a hurricane, it would potentially cause more "out gasing"of the methane. the decrease in air temp from the evaporization could then decrease the pressure in the eye even more, causing more evaporization aka self sustaining feedback...not good...not cool to see...and not going out until it hits land...oh flippin boy!
dr
ps
you think katrina was bad, how about an "inferno-cane"?
Originally posted by N.of norml
Originally posted by dr dodge
look at the video. its volume is at least 1/2 high density natural gas (methane)
if you calculate the volume of that gas, expanded to atmospheric pressure, it = 30,000 / 14.5 = 2068
that means one cubic foot of gas will be A MINIMUM of 2068 cu ft
and most is still stuck in frozen slurry on the bottom, and has not come out yet
my opinion is that a hurricane, coming from the ocean with no gas, would slowly suck the gas up until saturation point is acheived. Imaging the low pressure in the center of a hurricane, it would potentially cause more "out gasing"of the methane. the decrease in air temp from the evaporization could then decrease the pressure in the eye even more, causing more evaporization aka self sustaining feedback...not good...not cool to see...and not going out until it hits land...oh flippin boy!
dr
ps
you think katrina was bad, how about an "inferno-cane"?
We are definately on the same page here. One looks at the video of the single pipe gusher and it is plain that much of the output is gas.
However surface photos do not reflect the enormous volume the leak would become on it's way to the surface. In fact there is minimal surface gas at the well site.
This suggests a much of the gas is forming a clathrate hydrate as it cools under the huge pressure.
This is a time bomb as the methane hydrate which is likely forming a density partition in deep water at this point will continue to collect until it drifts into warmer water then an astronomical amount of natural gas will come out of the hydrate and bubble to the surface.
This type of event has caused extinction on this planet in the past.
That TPTB are not evacuating the coastal areas is telling as the facts above are well known to the petroleum geologists involved and I am sure the rover vehicles pass through a cloudy layer of methane on their way down to the hole, pictures you will never see.
IMO it is well known the real danger lies in the trapped gas in cold deep water that will eventually be released but the widespread panic such a revelation would cause prevents it's mention. Again just such a methane release caused a mass extinction on this planet once already. That just is NOT news the MSM can distribute.
N.