It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by devilwasp
read red strom rising tom clancy deals with this question
both sides come to a stand still at berlin
Originally posted by The Astral City
Come on we all know what would have happened. MAD. Pure and simple both sides would have used their nukes and the human race would have ended.
~Astral
Originally posted by sweatmonicaIdo
Originally posted by devilwasp
read red strom rising tom clancy deals with this question
both sides come to a stand still at berlin
Are you serious?
Dude, Tom Clancy doesn't know as much as he claims. So many of the scenarios he presents in Red Storm Rising and other books are so biased and inaccurate, and highly unlikely.
Do not trust Tom Clancy about anything. He knows as much as the average gung-ho military buff: nothing.
Originally posted by CoMrAdE_IvAn
So many have looked back at the Cold War thinking how close was the world to total destruction. it was very close but if there was a war without nuclear weapons or any kind of WOMD, who would win? Would the Warsaw Pact overwhelm NATO forces with their armour and sink the US navy, or would NATO be able to hold them back and bomb then to the stone age with effective Naval and airforce capabilities?
Originally posted by sweatmonicaIdo
Originally posted by devilwasp
read red strom rising tom clancy deals with this question
both sides come to a stand still at berlin
Do not trust Tom Clancy about anything. He knows as much as the average gung-ho military buff: nothing.
Originally posted by CoMrAdE_IvAn
I think putting Iraq into supporting an arguement is dumb. It was set in 1990 and the Iraqi's had concripts that were hopeless and US,Chinese and Russian armour (Not many T-72's). The equipment of the Iraq was plain crap.