It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by wolfwood290
a) If there is an omnipotent God, He would only allow one religion concerning Him.
This form of valid argument is called modus tollens or "denying the consequent" and can be represented as such:
a) If P, then Q.
b) Not Q.
c) Therefore, Not P.
Unless you guys can dismiss the truth of one of the premises a or b, the conclusion c necessarily follows. It becomes deductively valid.
Originally posted by wolfwood290
a) If there is an omnipotent God, He would only allow one religion concerning Him.
b) There are many religions concerning Him (an omnipotent God)
c) Therefore, there is no omnipotent God.
This form of valid argument is called modus tollens or "denying the consequent" and can be represented as such:
a) If P, then Q.
b) Not Q.
c) Therefore, Not P.
Unless you guys can dismiss the truth of one of the premises a or b, the conclusion c necessarily follows. It becomes deductively valid.
Why are there so many religions?